User talk:OathOn

This is OathOn's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1: 3 months

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi OathOn. Thank you for your work on Chatham Ragged School. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this article to cover the school and the extant listed building, a rare survivor of this 19th century movement. An interesting read. I've added a few more categories, with sections to provided a more focussed lede. I've consolidates the several near-duplicate references - the sources are short enough that readers don't need quotes as justification for every point being made.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 13:51, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Castle Hill, Ebbsfleet

Hello, OathOn. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Castle Hill, Ebbsfleet, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:07, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Harbour Village, Ebbsfleet

Hello, OathOn. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Harbour Village, Ebbsfleet, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:05, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ashmere, Ebbsfleet

Hello, OathOn. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ashmere, Ebbsfleet, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:05, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cable Wharf, Ebbsfleet

Hello, OathOn. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cable Wharf, Ebbsfleet, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:05, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ebbsfleet Green

Hello, OathOn. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ebbsfleet Green, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:07, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ebbsfleet Central

Hello, OathOn. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ebbsfleet Central, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:12, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Southill Barracks

The page Southill Barracks has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:17, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Test BL

Hello, OathOn. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Test BL, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:06, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Castle Hill, Ebbsfleet

Hello, OathOn. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Castle Hill".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 11:25, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ebbsfleet Green

Hello, OathOn. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ebbsfleet Green".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 12:26, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ebbsfleet Central

Hello, OathOn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ebbsfleet Central".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:24, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sainsbury's, Pepper Hill (October 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sainsbury's, Pepper Hill and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 14:35, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hillyfields

Hello, OathOn. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hillyfields, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hayward House, Rochester has been accepted

Hayward House, Rochester, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 11:11, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October 2025

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Richard Watts Charities when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 17:44, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Tesco, The Brook, Chatham

The page Tesco, The Brook, Chatham has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:30, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Potential LLM use

Hi - are you using AI tools for your recent edits here? If so, can you mention:

What tool(s) you are using, and what version
What prompts, features, workflow, etc. you are using
What review, if any, you are doing of the output

Thank you! NicheSports (talk) 13:51, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I am only using LLM's for the base (bare bones) of the subject. After, I then conduct further research verifying what's been outputted; I then add my own research. I only use an LLM to help me understand the subject, and then do significant changes if needed, which is always the case, but I do not rely on an LLM for everything.

For example, an article I created (The Brook, Chatham) took me nearly an entire month to research, change, in person research and more.

For the review of the output, I cross examine it using other tools aswell as my own analysis. If I can’t find any references to add as a source, I then use an LLM to help me find the source, or I search on different browsers and other tools using keywords and phrases, such as medway.gov.uk (if it’s a Medway subject, etc, but as stated I do not rely on an LLM for everything.

I would like to keep my prompts and what I use private. I hope this helps OathOn (talk) 14:01, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gillingham Park has been accepted

Gillingham Park, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 10:01, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]