User talk:Nuts5070

September 2014

Hello, I'm Jetstreamer. I noticed that you made a change to an article, London Heathrow Airport, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Wikipedia cannot be used as a source, per WP:CIRCULAR. Jetstreamer ^Talk 00:19, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Nuts5070. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Nuts5070. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Hello, I'm Elli. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, April 29, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. All new entries on "day of year" pages need to be cited (yeah, it's kinda confusing given the existing uncited entries, sorry) Elli (talk | contribs) 18:51, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Samajwadi Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Security Act. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Motor Vehicles Act

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Motor Vehicles Act, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:11, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on El Al Flight 1862

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page El Al Flight 1862, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:28, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:21, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Your edit to Uttar Pradesh Police has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 12:56, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 07:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Motor Vehicles Act

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Motor Vehicles Act, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:49, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copying in Wikipedia

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Manya Surve into Mumbai Police. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. -- Mikeblas (talk) 15:53, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever references was provided for Manya Surve on his article, I reused it on Mumbai Police. Not sure if that will work but if not, it can be removed then. Nuts5070 (talk) 12:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have you done what you were asked to do? DId you check the references yourself? Doug Weller talk 07:07, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy sections

Please read WP:CSECTION.-- Toddy1 (talk) 15:06, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You were asked nicely to read WP:CSECTION, which says it is not a good idea to have controversy sections. You re-added a controversy section to the article on Akhilesh Yadav and it got deleted. What else did you expect! That was the third time you tried adding a controversy section to that article.

Have you thought of using the article talk page to make a case for the inclusion of the deleted paragraphs, as suggested in Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle? If you are going to do this, you could make your life easier by proposing that the paragraphs be integrated into the article, instead of putting them in a hate section.-- Toddy1 (talk) 22:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Nuts5070 It appears that you are ignoring the alert given above by User:DaxServer. If this sort of editing continues, don't be surprised if you are topic banned from the topic area. Doug Weller talk 08:21, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you take a look at the page of Akhilesh Yadav's father's page Mulayam Singh Yadav, that article mentions certain controversies as well. And eventually it has been from the facts. This is not hate, in fact Akhilesh Yadav has been involved in these controversies. If you do not believe me, you can check the sources on different news webpages. Hence I added them, but it was kept on being removed. Refer to this link please.^[1] Nuts5070 (talk) 12:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How about we add controversy in the article of Akhilesh Yadav again, but edit it in a manner that will not be demeaning or insulting. In due process, I would like you all to take a look at this section of 2014 Badaun gang rape allegations#Reactions and Durga Shakti Nagpal#Suspension. Akhilesh Yadav was involved in this. And so was the political group Samajwadi Party. Based on that, if you feel it cannot be justified, then I will not put it. Nuts5070 (talk) 00:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You need to get agreement on the article's talk page. Doug Weller talk 13:33, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Doug Weller talk 13:51, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "India minister says rape 'sometimes right, sometimes wrong' – World News". Hürriyet Daily News. 6 June 2014.

CS1 error on Indira Gandhi International Airport

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Indira Gandhi International Airport, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:28, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Air India Flight 127

The article Air India Flight 127 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG - WP:ONEVENT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 02:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am open to review to make any edits to ensure that this page remains. I believe the incident was caused by a direct action of a calamity and I felt it relevant. Even if this article is short, I based it on another event which is much shorter - Air India Flight 403. Also, I was not able to figure out on adding photos through the proper channel, which is why the first step to edit is to remove the image. Nuts5070 (talk) 02:32, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I request you to kindly review some changes that I made. I do not consider this as a one off incident because it happened right after the floods in Mumbai in July 2005. And I have reviewed a lot of different news sources and forums, which I have included in the article. It took me a while to prepare this page. Please do not delete it. Nuts5070 (talk) 15:35, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — LeoFrank ^Talk 15:21, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from one or more pages into Narita International Airport. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Nobody (talk) 06:54, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (third request)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from Indian Premier League into Anti-Pakistan sentiment. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 14:31, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on 2024 Kolkata rape and murder

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2024 Kolkata rape and murder, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:43, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to British Pakistanis, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. نعم البدل (talk) 15:13, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The things that you have removed, unfortunately are a reality that is being shamelessly covered up. There is a reason why the Grooming Gangs of Pakistan, as well as honor killings was included in the page of British Pakistanis. If you want to cover that up and maintain the image that British Pakistanis do not engage in such things, then there are various forums where it can be included, like Quora, or even Twitter which is already taking place. Therefore, I do not believe that this was a mistake, and that you should have reverted it. No pun intended, but the people who engage in such inhumane acts should be exposed. But by reverting my edit, you are only covering up their criminal acts. Nuts5070 (talk) 19:01, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Cordless Larry. I noticed that you recently removed content from British Pakistanis without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Cordless Larry (talk) 20:44, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize but appreciate your response. I did not find that relevant enough to fit in. Nuts5070 (talk) 23:17, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Open road tolling, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 21:12, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. نعم البدل (talk) 22:42, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nuts5070,

Please come to ANI to participate in the discussion about some of your recent edits that lack having a NPOV. You seem to want to "right great wrongs" which is not what Wikipedia is for. If you want to go on a campaign about a problem you see in society, please reserve it to your own blog or website. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:00, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As requested, I am ready to participate in any discussion. Nuts5070 (talk) 15:49, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Civility is policy here. You have been blocked for 48 hours for this personal attack. You can request unblock from an uninvolved administrator by placing {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page. Bishonen | tålk 10:57, 21 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

It was a sudden reaction. I have now realized my mistake. I will not repeat it. Hopefully restrictions are removed by the earlier warning of 23rd April 2025. Nuts5070 (talk) 15:44, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nuts5070 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was out of line here and never intended a personal attack. But he reporting me without asking for a discussion was not warranted. And he claimed a few times that I was warned a few times. But that is not the case and I did not receive any feedback about it. Nuts5070 (talk) 13:59, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"Never intended a personal attack"? So you unintentionally called another editor a "loser"? How does that work? --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 14:07, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Adding unsourced commentary

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:24, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask for what did I add? Nuts5070 (talk) 22:28, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In cases like this, it's best to look at your notifications and your edit history. You probably got an automatic notification that one of your recent edits was reverted. Look at the edit summary of the revert. (If you didn't get the notification, you should got to Special:Preferences and activate notifications.) But even without the notification, you can always look at your contributions. You'll see Tag: Reverted next to your latest article edit. Go to the history of the article, find the revert, and read the edit summary of the revert. — Chrisahn (talk) 22:38, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw what was reverted, but did not get notification. Unfortunately the sources I was going to add, didn't make sense and were not reliable, so I saved it despite the risk as I was searching for something new. However the user's tone did not feel polite. Nuts5070 (talk) 22:44, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The tone wasn't polite, and for good reasons. You have been asked multiple times to always provide reliable sources when you add content to an article. (See the messages above.) That's one of the most fundamental rules of Wikipedia. You violated that rule again. If you keep breaking the rules although people ask you to stop, they'll stop being polite to you. — Chrisahn (talk) 22:51, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Nuts5070 (talk) 22:58, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistanis vs Indians

Consider this a formal warning: any further use of the encyclopedia to present resentment about Pakistanis doing something you don't approve of will bring sanctions. Acroterion (talk) 16:01, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. But make sure this warning applies to the other side as well. If it has to be neutral, then it applies to both sides. Nuts5070 (talk) 16:03, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, we're not going to both-sides this. You are the one displaying prejudice. Acroterion (talk) 16:08, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well even if I avoid this one side prejudice, it should still be neutral from their end. Nuts5070 (talk) 16:09, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not 'neutral' when it comes to whether pig-ignorant bigoted scum should be permitted to spread their shit around articles. AndyTheGrump (talk) 16:10, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Andy isn't an administrator. I am. Your conduct is disruptive. Andy, please disengage, and Nuts, stop trying to litigate this issue. Acroterion (talk) 16:21, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate it. I will not litigate this issue, but his use of profanities is not justified. If he does so, he should be blocked like I can be for my edits. Nuts5070 (talk) 16:23, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's intemperate, but a not-surprising response to your prejudicial edits, which are a far graver concern. Acroterion (talk) 16:26, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. I will refrain that. Nuts5070 (talk) 16:26, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to WP:Administrative action review have been reverted for one simple reason - that noticeboard is the wrong place. AndyTheGrump is not an admininstator and the action was in no way administrative. Incivility is reported at WP:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. But, before you do that, there are a couple of things you should be aware of:

Any action taken would be preventative rather than punitive.
Everyone's behaviour, including the reporter's. is looked at there.

Phil Bridger (talk) 17:49, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's a little complex to report incivility, so I was not able to find the right place where to report. Nuts5070 (talk) 18:56, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, since this is your own talk page, you're free to delete the insulting comment. Or to leave it. Whatever you prefer. See WP:OWNTALK. — Chrisahn (talk) 19:44, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The personal attacks were on the talk page of user:AndyTheGrump. Nuts5070 (talk) 19:46, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Anyway, you can treat Andy's comment above as you see fit. — Chrisahn (talk) 19:52, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A recent edit about Illegal immigration to India was removed by AndyTheGrump. I would like a review. It is not connected to either British Pakistanis, and has nothing to do with the resentment of Pakistanis.

My earlier edits on the same article were about illegal Bangladeshis in India as well. Nuts5070 (talk) 14:34, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Community banned

By the consensus of the Wikipedia community, you have been banned from en.wikipedia. Appealing this ban can be conducted following the process detailed here. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:02, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What's the process to appeal the ban? Nuts5070 (talk) 10:54, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To find the answer to your question, just read the message, click the link, read the linked page. — Chrisahn (talk) 10:56, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have submitted the appeal and in due process, reported about uncivilized conduct of AndyTheGrump. It does seem that he has a history of personal attacks and yet has got no bans. Nuts5070 (talk) 11:17, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, complaining about others is certainly going to help your appeal. You obviously understood why you were banned. (I'm being sarcastic.) — Chrisahn (talk) 11:20, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah it doesn't help my case but it's observed that AndyTheGrump has never been warned or given temporary bans it seems for his personal attacks. Sarcasm is acceptable, personal attacks are not. Nuts5070 (talk) 11:26, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not only does it not help your case, it undermines it. If your appeal has a similar thrust as your message about personal attacks above, it will certainly be denied. You were not banned for personal attacks. If you don't understand why you were banned, the ban won't be lifted. — Chrisahn (talk) 11:29, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concentrate on why you were banned, not why someone else was not. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:31, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I already understood why I was banned, but if someone doesn't get banned for personal attacks, then it clearly isn't right. I mean yeah you can criticize someone, be a little sarcastic, add humor, but personally attacking someone? It's as good as bullying. Nuts5070 (talk) 11:33, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're missing the point. Just listen to what others are telling you. — Chrisahn (talk) 11:34, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

10-4 Nuts5070 (talk) 11:36, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Still no update on the appeal of the ban. Nuts5070 (talk) 16:22, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you expect an update within eight hours? Just be patient, and you will almost certainly be told that the ban has been upheld. I can't imagine anything that you are likely to say that would overturn a ban for such racist editing. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:21, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

More than 3 weeks ago, my Quora account received a similar ban and it turned out that it was hacked, as anyone who logged in bypassed the 2FA. And despite telling them that, they have still not replied yet and reinstated my Quora login. Nuts5070 (talk) 18:23, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't know the difference between Quora and Wikipedia then you should be banned per WP:CIR. Do you claim that it was not you who made the edits about Pakistanis? Phil Bridger (talk) 18:30, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well that was me, and I accept that I had one sided views which should have not been there. But about the Quora account, I didn't login for days until the moment I received the email that it was banned due to spam policies and hate speech. Nuts5070 (talk) 18:33, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I, and any other editor you meet here, have no connection with Quora. I have never edited there, and can see no reason why you are talking about Quora on Wikipedia. If you want to complain about Quora then go to Quora. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:44, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They are already notified. Just waiting to hear from wiki team. Nuts5070 (talk) 20:06, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[akyareply-1] "India minister says rape 'sometimes right, sometimes wrong' – World News". Hürriyet Daily News. 6 June 2014.

[1]