User talk:Nomadfrau912

Mirrors

Thanks for contributing to the article Hugh I, Count of Empúries. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Sam Kuru (talk) 19:36, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice! Nomadfrau912 (talk) 15:16, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

James Blake

Please note that per WP:DRAFTNOCAT, drafts aren't allowed to be in categories. Please don't "add categories" to the page while it's still in draft form, because it can't be in categories while it's still in draft form. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 15:25, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay sorry i wasn't aware of this . Thanks for the help Nomadfrau912 (talk) 15:28, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joel Mawhinney (June 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chippla360 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joel Mawhinney and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 00:46, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Currently gathering more sources! Nomadfrau912 (talk) 14:23, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nomadfrau912! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 00:46, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Vittorio Angelone has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Vittorio Angelone. Thanks! Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 13:54, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vittorio Angelone (June 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chippla360 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vittorio Angelone and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 13:54, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'll find more! Nomadfrau912 (talk) 14:22, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Blake (Television Presenter) has been accepted

James Blake (Television Presenter), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 07:00, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Nomadfrau912 (talk) 18:56, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jamie Dornan

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to Jamie Dornan have been removed because the citation you added was to another Wikipedia article or an external wiki. As discussed at our policies on circular sourcing and self-published sources, Wikipedia and other wikis should not be used in citations because they are not considered reliable sources. You are welcome to re-add the information using a better reference, perhaps from the article you originally cited. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jay8g [V•T•E] 03:35, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arturo Béjar (July 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of your sources are fake?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arturo Béjar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

qcne (talk) 12:38, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

Hello, I'm Jessicapierce. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Rahman Ismail have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Jessicapierce (talk) 15:06, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jessicapierce. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Rahman Ismail in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jessicapierce (talk) 15:06, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jessicapierce. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Jamie Dornan in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jessicapierce (talk) 15:06, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not replace actual citations with phantom footnotes like this: [2]. You've described these changes as grammar fixes, which they are not - you are damaging the articles. Jessicapierce (talk) 15:06, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]