User talk:Nevermore27
![]() | Things I can do to help WikiProject U.S. Congressedit list
|
1, 2 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be auto-archived by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 4. |
Nomination for deletion of Template:Party shading/New Progressive Party (Puerto Rico)/active
[edit]Template:Party shading/New Progressive Party (Puerto Rico)/active has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:42, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Party shading/Popular Democratic Party (Puerto Rico)/active
[edit]Template:Party shading/Popular Democratic Party (Puerto Rico)/active has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:42, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Party shading/Independent/current
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Party shading/Independent/current, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Yelps ᘛ⁐̤ᕐᐷ critique me 15:54, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Message
[edit]Hi, I agree with you on the lack of NPOV on many Wikipedia articles. Wikipedia has become very biased but I’m not sure what to do about it. Bjoh249 (talk) 16:49, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Bjoh249: thank you Nevermore27 (talk) 18:20, 25 July 2025 (UTC)