User talk:Nevermore27
 | Things I can do to help WikiProject U.S. Congressedit list
|
|
Click here to leave a new message. |
Speedy deletion nomination of Party shading/Independent/current
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Party shading/Independent/current, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Yelps ᘛ⁐̤ᕐᐷ critique me 15:54, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Message
[edit]Hi, I agree with you on the lack of NPOV on many Wikipedia articles. Wikipedia has become very biased but I’m not sure what to do about it. Bjoh249 (talk) 16:49, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Bjoh249: thank you Nevermore27 (talk) 18:20, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Editing a deletion discussion after it has been closed
[edit]Hi, Nevermore27. In Special:Diff/1317534093, you edited your comment in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young Republican group chat leaks after the discussion had been closed. Please understand that discussions should generally not be edited after they are formally closed, as the closed discussion is a record of what the discussion looked like at the time of closure, so I have reverted your edit in Special:Diff/1317665232. Once a discussion has been formally closed, it is too late to change your comment in the discussion. In this case, it does not look like your desired edit would have impacted the outcome of the discussion, which aligns with your current position, so there is no action needed on your part. Thank you. — Newslinger talk 09:42, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Newslinger it was an accident, I didn't realize the discussion was closed until I put the edit through. thanks. Nevermore27 (talk) 12:11, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 18 November 2025 (UTC)