User talk:Naraht

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Alpha Phi Omega

Hello, Naraht. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Alpha Phi Omega, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 17:10, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

APO category

Per our discussion on the list talk page I have created Category:Alpha Phi Omega members and will be adding the articles from the list to it. Categories aren't subject to the same notability requirements as stand alone lists so the category will persist no matter what happens to the list, hopefully this offers much of the same utility as a navigational and organizational aid. TBH I was surprised to find out that the cat didn't exist already. COI aside you've worked really hard on that list and I would hate to see the utility removed from the project. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 08:35, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Horse Eye's Back Not a determining Condition. Categories for membership in various GLOs have been created in the past and deleted as not a determining condition. I will be proposing that list for deletion.Naraht (talk) 08:37, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If thats true you can just prod it, I have no objection. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 08:39, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure though? I see lots of similar cats, Category:Members of the Black Panther Party for example. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 08:42, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not a GLO.Naraht (talk) 08:42, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What is the difference between a GLO and a political party in terms of being a determining condition? Both are social groups. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 08:46, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We have Category:Freemasons so we seems to allow fraternal orgs. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 08:49, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• shock*. Republican Party (United States) = Friday night bowling League???? Wikipedia definitely has different rules for those two. I need to head to bed. The longer that I have this discussion, the less likely I think that List of Alpha Phi Omega members has any chance of deletion, especially as it is being remapped in the form of List of Alpha Phi Alpha members. And the guideline here is Wikipedia:COPDEF. And PROD isn't allowed on Categories.Naraht (talk) 08:53, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Alpha Phi Alpha members also lacks anything which indicates notability... And its not a real FA, look at the history... Its a 2007 FA which would not survive a challenge, not going to challenge because people keep saying I'm battle grounding. Goodnight! Rest assured that I will not be nominating List of Alpha Phi Omega members for deletion anytime soon, take all the time you need to find sources. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 09:09, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Saint Francis University

My intention is BOTH Saint Francis University (Pennsylvania) and Saint Francis University (Hong Kong) will get disambiguation term, while Saint Francis University would redirect to University of Saint Francis (which itself is a disambiguation page). --Leeyc0 (Talk) 03:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Leeyc0 Please point a place where X University and University of X have a joint Disambiguation page. SFU Pennsylvania is primary over SFU Hong Kong (about 400 links to about 100 links and that's the more favorable way to look at it as Google searches on the two are *far* more imbalanced.Naraht (talk) 12:22, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest to raise this issue to community and let the community decide. I don't think we can make this judgement privately. I am open to both options. --Leeyc0 (Talk) 13:13, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just raised your concern in Template_talk:College#Template-protected_edit_request_on_10_January_2024. This looks like to be the best place for this issue. --Leeyc0 (Talk) 13:20, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Leeyc0 This being my talk page or Template:College?Naraht (talk) 14:16, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In the talk page of Template:College --Leeyc0 (Talk) 15:05, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Pi Alpha Tau

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Pi Alpha Tau, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:50, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 10 January 2024

• From the editor: NINETEEN MORE YEARS! NINETEEN MORE YEARS!

• Special report: Public Domain Day 2024

• Technology report: Wikipedia: A Multigenerational Pursuit

• News and notes: In other news ... see ya in court!

• In focus: The long road of a featured article candidate

• In the media: What is plagiarism? Oklahoma Disneyland? Reaching a human being at Wikipedia?

• WikiProject report: WikiProjects Israel and Palestine

• Obituary: Anthony Bradbury

• Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2023

• Crossword: everybody gangsta till the style sheets start cascading

• Comix: Conflict resolution

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 January 2024

• News and notes: Wikipedian Osama Khalid celebrated his 30th birthday in jail

• Opinion: Until it happens to you

• Disinformation report: How paid editors squeeze you dry

• In the media: Katherine Maher new NPR CEO, go check Wikipedia, race in the race

• In focus: The long road of a featured article candidate, part 2

• Recent research: Croatian takeover was enabled by "lack of bureaucratic openness and rules constraining [admins]"

• Comix: We've all got to start somewhere

• Traffic report: DJ, gonna burn this goddamn house right down

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:14, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 13 February 2024

• News and notes: Wikimedia Russia director declared "foreign agent" by Russian gov; EU prepares to pile on the papers

• Disinformation report: How low can the scammers go?

• Gallery: Before and After: Why you don't need to touch grass to dramatically improve images of flora and fauna

• In the media: Speaking in tongues, toeing the line, and dressing the part

• Serendipity: Is this guy the same as the one who was a Nazi?

• Traffic report: Griselda, Nikki, Carl, Jannik and two types of football

• Crossword: Our crossword to bear

• Comix: Strongly

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:35, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 2 March 2024

• News and notes: Wikimedia enters US Supreme court hearings as "the dolphin inadvertently caught in the net"

• Recent research: Images on Wikipedia "amplify gender bias"

• In the media: The Scottish Parliament gets involved, a wikirace on live TV, and the Foundation's CTO goes on record

• Obituary: Vami_IV

• Traffic report: Supervalentinefilmbowlday

• WikiCup report: High-scoring WikiCup first round comes to a close

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:02, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Northwestern College (Iowa)

I noticed that in the right stats sidebar, you changed "Staff" to "Total staff." We typically talk about "faculty" (i.e., those who teach, or professors and instructors) and "staff (i.e., those working in non-teaching roles--from the president to an administrative assistant or maintenance worker). With "Academic staff" and "Total staff," could it seem as if "Total staff" includes "Academic staff"? (It doesn't. We have 84 full-time faculty and 140 full-time non-faculty, or administrators and staff.) Our total full-time employees comes to 224 people. Is there a way to make that clear? Thank you in advance for your help! Skielark (talk) 20:23, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Skielark Please take a look at the documentation on Template:Infobox University, It sounds like what you want is academic_staff=84 and administrative_staff = 140. Does that help?Naraht (talk) 20:27, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it does! Thank you for your help! Skielark (talk) 21:34, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LI-importance & Syracuse-importance

Would you care to elaborate @ Template talk:WikiProject New York (state)#LI-importance & Syracuse-importance, at least so there's a record?   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  15:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tom.Reding Good enough?Naraht (talk) 15:55, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 March 2024

• Technology report: Millions of readers still seeing broken pages as "temporary" disabling of graph extension nears its second year

• Interview: Interview on Wikimedia Foundation fundraising and finance strategy

• Special report: 19-page PDF accuses Wikipedia of bias against Israel, suggests editors be forced to reveal their real names, and demands a new feature allowing people to view the history of Wikipedia articles

• Op-Ed: Wikipedia in the age of personality-driven knowledge

• Recent research: "Newcomer Homepage" feature mostly fails to boost new editors

• News and notes: Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee Charter ratified

• In the media: "For me it’s the autism": AARoad editors on the fork more traveled

• Traffic report: He rules over everything, on the land called planet Dune

• Humour: Letters from the editors

• Comix: Layout issue

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:40, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024

Hello Naraht,

New Page Review queue January to March 2024

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:26, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha Phi Omega (Philippines)

I think List of Alpha Phi Omega (Philippines) chapters and alumni associations should be split into two articles, based on its length. Maybe also move the citations to their own column. Thoughts? Rublamb (talk) 15:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rublamb Sounds good. I need to go diving through facebook to find the dates for the last 5 years or so. Official facebook feed of APO Phil should be OK as a ref.Naraht (talk) 15:38, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eta Upsilon Gamma has been accepted

Eta Upsilon Gamma, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Naraht (talk) 19:53, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MALIK (fraternity), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mu.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 25 April 2024

• In the media: Censorship and wikiwashing looming over RuWiki, edit wars over San Francisco politics, and another wikirace on live TV

• News and notes: A sigh of relief for open access as Italy makes a slight U-turn on their cultural heritage reproduction law

• WikiConference report: WikiConference North America 2023 in Toronto recap

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Newspapers (Not WP:NOTNEWS)

• Recent research: New survey of over 100,000 Wikipedia users

• Traffic report: O.J., cricket and a three body problem

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Pages using infobox fraternity with founded incomplete

A tag has been placed on Category:Pages using infobox fraternity with founded incomplete indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:34, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Epsilon Nu Tau

The article Epsilon Nu Tau has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacking sufficient secondary sources to meet WP:ORGCRIT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 09:02, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Epsilon Nu Tau

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Epsilon Nu Tau, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AusLondonder (talk) 09:03, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Epsilon Nu Tau for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Epsilon Nu Tau is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epsilon Nu Tau until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished, or remove comments from the discussion.

AusLondonder (talk) 12:08, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox change, recent updates

Nice catch, adding Category:Pages using infobox fraternity with missing website. Always a vexing issue.

Might I ask that you confirm whether Sigma Xi now should have a category, like the other Honor Society Caucus fraternities? Since I created the chapter list, I think it is probably appropriate, but defer to you as our resident category expert. Please create it, if fitting. Jax MN (talk) 18:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jax MNRight now, there are only two pages. I'm hesitant since this is a category that has been deleted before. When we get three, no question.Naraht (talk) 18:49, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

At some point, one of us may add a Notables article. We can revisit it then. No problem. Jax MN (talk) 19:09, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jax MNQuite likely!Naraht (talk) 19:14, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 May 2024

• News and notes: Democracy in action: multiple elections

• Special report: Will the new RfA reform come to the rescue of administrators?

• Arbitration report: Ruined temples for posterity to ponder over – arbitration from '22 to '24

• In the media: Deadnames on the French Wikipedia, and a duel between Russian wikis

• Op-Ed: Wikidata to split as sheer volume of information overloads infrastructure

• Comix: Generations

• Traffic report: Crawl out through the fallout, baby

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Munich

Re: Corps Palatia Munich, and my addition of (Munich) in the infobox.

Hi Naraht. Obviously that is the English translation of the German city name now shown as Corps Palatia München in the infobox. As this is the English Wikipedia, I offered this parenthetical clarification for those unfamiliar with the German language. You don't think it useful? Jax MN (talk) 17:55, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 8 June 2024

• News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation publishes its Form 990 for fiscal year 2022-2023

• Technology report: New Page Patrol receives a much-needed software upgrade

• Deletion report: The lore of Kalloor

• In the media: National cable networks get in on the action arguing about what the first sentence of a Wikipedia article ought to say

• News from the WMF: Progress on the plan — how the Wikimedia Foundation advanced on its Annual Plan goals during the first half of fiscal year 2023-2024

• Opinion: Public response to the editors of Settler Colonial Studies

• Recent research: ChatGPT did not kill Wikipedia, but might have reduced its growth

• Featured content: We didn't start the wiki

• Essay: No queerphobia

• Special report: RetractionBot is back to life!

• Traffic report: Chimps, Eurovision, and the return of the Baby Reindeer

• Comix: The Wikipediholic Family

• Humour: Wikipedia rattled by sophisticated cyberattack of schoolboy typing "balls" in infobox

• Concept: Palimpsestuous

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:27, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Theta Phi Alpha

Why are you reverting my edits to this page? The revisions are needed to reflect what's happening with the National organization. I'm on the Grand Council. Thank you. Katie Evans 2600:4041:6683:1C00:D519:CEC:2999:E6D7 (talk) 20:44, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to respond over at the talk page for the article about Theta Phi Alpha, for more audience. No way to directly alert someone who edits without an account but hope to continue there.Naraht (talk) 20:56, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 July 2024

• News and notes: WMF board elections and fundraising updates

• Special report: Wikimedia Movement Charter ratification vote underway, new Council may surpass power of Board

• In focus: How the Russian Wikipedia keeps it clean despite having just a couple dozen administrators

• Discussion report: Wikipedians are hung up on the meaning of Madonna

• In the media: War and information in war and politics

• Sister projects: On editing Wikisource

• Obituary: Hanif Al Husaini, Salazarov, Hyacinth, and PirjanovNurlan

• Opinion: Etika: a Pop Culture Champion

• Gallery: Spokane Willy's photos

• Op-Ed: Why you should not vote in the 2024 WMF BoT elections

• Crossword: On a day of independence, beat crosswords into crossploughshares

• Humour: A joke

• Cobwebs: Counting to a billion — manuscripts don't burn

• Recent research: Is Wikipedia Politically Biased? Perhaps

• Traffic report: Talking about you and me, and the games people play

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ISBN

Hi, I noticed that you offered Salpynx to help clear ISBN errors: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Salpynx&diff=prev&oldid=1204790683

It's a been a while since I used AWB (I once had a registered account, but abandoned it after some interpersonal issues drove me away) but I think that the easiest task would be to replace every instance of <nowiki>ISBN 9999999999999</nowiki> with {{ISBN|{{Format ISBN|9999999999999|out=13}}}}, where the input string and list of articles are copied from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Check_Wikipedia/ISBN_errors. Using {{Format ISBN}} would mean there is no need to preprocess the input string. The 9999999999999 could be left as is.

I've been working through many of these issues manually, concentrating on the errors that appear to be unique and on articles with more than a couple of errors. I don't think I'll ever get to the articles that have just one error. Any help would be greatly appreciated! 76.14.122.5 (talk) 02:46, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 22 July 2024

• Discussion report: Internet users flock to Wikipedia to debate its image policy over Trump raised-fist photo

• News and notes: Wikimedia community votes to ratify Movement Charter; Wikimedia Foundation opposes ratification

• News from the WMF: Wikimedia Foundation Board resolution and vote on the proposed Movement Charter

• Essay: Reflections on editing and obsession

• In the media: What's on Putin's fork, the court's docket, and in Harrison's book?

• Obituary: JamesR

• Crossword: Vaguely bird-shaped crossword

• Humour: Joe Biden withdraws RfA, Donald Trump selects co-nom

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:31, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Delta Phi Delta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sweet Pea.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:22, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 August 2024

• In the media: Portland pol profile paid for from public purse

• Recent research: STORM: AI agents role-play as "Wikipedia editors" and "experts" to create Wikipedia-like articles, a more sophisticated effort than previous auto-generation systems

• In focus: Twitter marks the spot

• News and notes: Another Wikimania has concluded.

• Special report: Nano or just nothing: Will nano go nuclear?

• Opinion: HouseBlaster's RfA debriefing

• Traffic report: Ball games, movies, elections, but nothing really weird

• Humour: I'm proud to be a template

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:49, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive

New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive
On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Arun Kumar Mehta AfD round 2

Hi there, as a previous participant in an AfD for Arun Kumar Mehta that was closed as "soft delete," I am notifying you that the article has been refunded and is now up for deletion again at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arun Kumar Mehta (2nd nomination). Thanks! Dclemens1971 (talk) 13:24, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 September 2024

• News and notes: WikiCup enters final round, MCDC wraps up activities, 17-year-old hoax article unmasked

• In the media: AI is not playing games anymore. Is Wikipedia ready?

• Recent research: Simulated Wikipedia seen as less credible than ChatGPT and Alexa in experiment

• News from the WMF: Meet the 12 candidates running in the WMF Board of Trustees election

• Wikimania: A month after Wikimania 2024

• Serendipity: What it's like to be Wikimedian of the Year

• Traffic report: After the gold rush

• Humour: Local man halfway through rude reply no longer able to recall why he hates other editor

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:27, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 September 2024

• In the media: Courts order Wikipedia to give up names of editors, legal strain anticipated from "online safety laws"

• Community view: Indian courts order Wikipedia to take down name of crime victim, editors strive towards consensus

• Serendipity: A Wikipedian at the 2024 Paralympics

• Opinion: asilvering's RfA debriefing

• News and notes: Are you ready for admin elections?

• Gallery: Are Luddaites defending the English Wikipedia?

• Recent research: Article-writing AI is less "prone to reasoning errors (or hallucinations)" than human Wikipedia editors

• Traffic report: Jump in the line, rock your body in time

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:10, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 19 October 2024

• News and notes: One election's end, another election's beginning

• Recent research: "As many as 5%" of new English Wikipedia articles "contain significant AI-generated content", says paper

• In the media: Off to the races! Wikipedia wins!

• Contest: A WikiCup for the Global South

• Traffic report: A scream breaks the still of the night

• Book review: The Editors

• Humour: The Newspaper Editors

• Crossword: Spilled Coffee Mug

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:15, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 6 November 2024

• From the editors: Editing Wikipedia should not be a crime

• News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation shares ANI lawsuit updates; first admin elections appoint eleven sysops; first admin recalls opened; temporary accounts coming soon?

• In the media: An old scrimmage, politics and purported libel

• Special report: Wikipedia editors face litigation, censorship

• Gallery: Why you should take more photos and upload them

• In focus: Questions and answers about the court case

• Traffic report: Twisted tricks or tempting treats?

• Technology report: Wikimedia tech, the Asian News International case, and the ultra-rare BLACKLOCK

• Humour: Man quietly slinks away from talk page argument after realizing his argument dumb, wrong

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:05, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright discussion

Interesting discussion, one that gets to the heart of our use of crests, badges and the like. I recently was alerted of a potential copyright or licensing violation which appeared to me to be incorrect, so I brought the issue up for dispute. See Wikipedia:Media_copyright_questions#Member_badge. Once this is resolved we should capture the discussion in our Project archive.
Jax MN (talk) 19:57, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 November 2024

• News and notes: Open letter to WMF about court case breaks one thousand signatures, big arb case declined, U4C begins accepting cases

• In the media: Summons issued for Wikipedia editors by Indian court, "Gaza genocide" RfC close in news, old admin Gwern now big AI guy, and a "spectrum of reluctance" over Australian place names

• Recent research: SPINACH: AI help for asking Wikidata "challenging real-world questions"

• News from the WMF: Wikimedia Foundation and Wikimedia Endowment audit reports: FY 2023–2024

• Traffic report: Well, let us share with you our knowledge, about the electoral college

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:43, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About the proxying issue re JH

Courtesy link: this user talk discussion

Hi, Naraht. responding to this comment of yours at JH's TP: Imho, it is not so much a question of whether it involves reverting your own edit or not (although that would likely be viewed as a smaller infraction than reverting someone else's, *if* proxying were involved), but rather at whose behest you are doing the revert. If you decided to revert yourself for reasons entirely your own, then it is not proxying; and if you are influenced to do so by a discussion from a blocked user, then it might be proxying. Even in the latter case, if you take full ownership of it and independently believe it is the right course of action, then you could make the revert, but that is a gray area. That is my interpretation of WP:PROXYING, but others might see it differently. I think a self-revert of the type you dsecribed is probably okay; but if you have any doubts about it, you could simply ask a trusted admin about it on their Talk page, or here on your Talk page either by pinging an individual admin, or using template {{Admin help}}. Cheers, Mathglot (talk) 22:15, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mathglot Thank you. I think the edit in question is the one on The Daily Campus and that isn't mine, it is by Liz and I personally think that as an actual street address, it should either be Storrs-Mansfield, or Storrs as I don't think Storrs, Mansfield, Connecticut is one of the choices by the US Postal Service (and specifically as a *street address*, I *think* USPS trumps WP:COMMONNAME, but I'd like to be sure, get other opinions). And in regards to the ANI comment, I not only have half of the pages I changed on my watchlists, I'm running a search on insource:/Storrs-Mansfield/ whenever I get on Wikipedia. Oddly, I may have been the first one to object to the changes because they kept coming up in all of the Fraternity and Sorority chapter lists where UConn has a chapter. (I'm on WP:FRAT) and because I didn't indicate it elsewhere, Thank you to Liz as well.Naraht (talk) 22:37, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I got pinged to Talk:Storrs, Connecticut § Storrs-Mansfield Discussion by the Rfc bot, and probably won't get into the content dispute regarding the name more than I already have as I don't really care that much, so will probably leave it to others. (I might get involved if proper interpretation of ngrams or other search result data becomes an issue, because casual users of search tools so often get it wrong.) The Talk page is the right place to resolve that, and obviously there have been recent attempts to do so, which have had to deal with the bludgeoning and other issues that left JH temp blocked.

There is certainly no rush as far as resolving this question, and imho it would be a good idea to put off any further attempts to change things at that article for a little while, if only because of the likelihood of a repeat of past strife and wasting our most precious resource (editor time). Once the dust has settled one way or another, a discussion (or possibly an Rfc) down the road might resolve the question among editors dealing with the question collegially and disinterestedly, but I don't think we are there yet on this issue. I think the most efficient path (least use of multiple editors' time) would be to wait a few months, and then try. Just my two cents. Mathglot (talk) 23:09, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mathglot probably. I don't know if there is any formal way to say "let's put a discussion on ice for a few months", but I can support.Naraht (talk) 00:04, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is an informal way to do so, which is just to propose and get consensus for a moratorium. Sometimes in perennial Rfc questions which keep coming up over and over, someone puts forward a proposal (either while the Rfc is going on or right after) that there should be no further Rfc's on the same topic for <time interval>, which I've seen be up to 18 months for particuarly egregious cases. With such a consensus, premature attempts to raise it again can be hatted, with |result=Moratorium in effect; see <link>.

But here, a much easier response is just silence. After someone proposes a change that is reverted and discussed, if they are unable to gain consensus on the Talk page after a reasonable amount of discussion, there is no requirement for the majority in opposition to respond to every one of their questions or ripostes. You can simply let them have the last word, and keep on talking and talking as much as they want, with no response at all. Their having the last word does not equal consensus, and after hearing nothing back for a while, they usually give up. If they don't, and barge ahead unilaterally, reinserting the oppositional material again, one of the majority simply reverts, with edit summary: "No consensus; see Talk", or "Contrary to previous consensus; see Talk", and if they do it again, a different majority editor should revert and then take them to the Edit warring noticeboard. That should be the end of it.

I would just choose silence at this point, although I fear, as you do, that it will spring up again. If it does, I would respond with one brief sentence in the discussion just like those suggested edit summaries, and then never respond again (unless some completely new argument is supplied which seems unlikely, and even then, they would need consensus). It's fine if they get the last word and then it just fizzles out; that saves you from having to respond. Mathglot (talk) 00:46, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2009 LGBTQ-related television

A tag has been placed on Category:2009 LGBTQ-related television indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 02:28, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2010 LGBTQ-related television

A tag has been placed on Category:2010 LGBTQ-related television indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 02:28, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2011 LGBTQ-related television

A tag has been placed on Category:2011 LGBTQ-related television indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 02:28, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 12 December 2024

• News and notes: Arbitrator election concludes

• Arbitration report: Palestine-Israel articles 5

• Disinformation report: Sex, power, and money revisited

• Op-ed: On the backrooms by Tamzin

• In focus: Are Wikipedia articles representative of Western or world knowledge?

• In the media: Like the BBC, often useful but not impartial

• Traffic report: Something Wicked for almost everybody

• Opinion: Worm That Turned's reconfirmation RfA debriefing

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:58, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Apologies, but since you were somewhat involved with UConnIPUser you should be notified. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Very Busy) 19:57, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yoshi24517 I was away from Wikipedia for 12(?) hours and it went from my original reversion of the UConnIPUser change to redirect to the ban hammer being dropped. In some ways I'm sorry I missed it. Feel free to invite me to any other Storrs Connecticut related ugliness :).Naraht (talk) 13:33, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive

January 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Holiday Bling

		The Fraternity/Sorority Barnstar
		For figuring out ways to find and track data for our 2024 cleanup project and for creating many categories and tempates needed by WikiProject Fraternities and Sororities.

Rublamb (talk) 19:52, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rublamb thank you very much!Naraht (talk) 14:48, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 December 2024

• News and notes: Responsibilities and liabilities as a "Very Large Online Platform"

• Op-ed: Beeblebrox on Wikipediocracy, the Committee, and everything

• Opinion: Graham87 on being the first-ever administrator recall subject

• In the media: Delhi High Court considers Caravan and Ken for evaluating the ANI vs. WMF case

• From the archives: Where to draw the line in reporting?

• Recent research: "Wikipedia editors are quite prosocial", but those motivated by "social image" may put quantity over quality

• Humour: Backlash over Santa Claus' Wikipedia article intensifies

• Gallery: A feast of holidays and carols

• Traffic report: Was a long and dark December

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:01, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Canada's Drag Race Season 3 contestants

A tag has been placed on Category:Canada's Drag Race Season 3 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:39, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Canada's Drag Race Season 4 contestants

A tag has been placed on Category:Canada's Drag Race Season 4 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:40, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Canada's Drag Race Season 5 contestants

A tag has been placed on Category:Canada's Drag Race Season 5 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:40, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Daphne Morrow

Why did you roll back this edit? Phil Bridger (talk) 15:01, 9 January 2025 (UTC) Phil Bridger When I figure that out, I'll let both of us know. I've undone the rollback. thank you for letting me know.Naraht (talk) 15:06, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 January 2025

• From the editors: Looking back, looking forward

• Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2024

• In the media: Will you be targeted?

• Technology report: New Calculator template brings interactivity at last

• Essay: Meet the Canadian who holds the longest editing streak on Wikipedia

• Opinion: Reflections one score hence

• News and notes: It's a new dawn, it's a new day, it's a new life for me... and I'm feeling free

• Serendipity: What we've left behind, and where we want to go next

• Op-ed: Elon Musk and the right on Wikipedia

• In focus: Twenty years of The Signpost: What did it take?

• Arbitration report: Analyzing commonalities of some contentious topics

• Humour: How to make friends on Wikipedia

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:55, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 17 contestants has been nominated for merging

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 17 contestants has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 09:10, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 16 contestants has been nominated for merging

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 16 contestants has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 09:10, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 15 contestants has been nominated for merging

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 15 contestants has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 09:10, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 14 contestants has been nominated for merging

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 14 contestants has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 09:10, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 13 contestants has been nominated for merging

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 13 contestants has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 09:10, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 12 contestants has been nominated for merging

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 12 contestants has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 09:11, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 11 contestants has been nominated for merging

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 11 contestants has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 09:11, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 10 contestants has been nominated for merging

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 10 contestants has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 09:11, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 9 contestants has been nominated for merging

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 9 contestants has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 09:11, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 8 contestants has been nominated for merging

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 8 contestants has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 09:11, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 7 contestants has been nominated for merging

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 7 contestants has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 09:11, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 6 contestants has been nominated for merging

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 6 contestants has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 09:11, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 5 contestants has been nominated for merging

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 5 contestants has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 09:11, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 4 contestants has been nominated for merging

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 4 contestants has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 09:11, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 1 contestants has been nominated for merging

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 1 contestants has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 09:12, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 2 contestants has been nominated for merging

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 2 contestants has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 09:13, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 3 contestants has been nominated for merging

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 3 contestants has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 09:13, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Questionable AWB edit

What was this edit for? It looks like it did nothing to the rendered page, a violation of the AWB rules. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:38, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jonesey95Deleted the second space after ISBN in the run-on, which I believe to be part of the "Apply general fixes". And yes, pretty minor, if you choose to revert, go ahead.Naraht (talk) 14:44, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:AWBRULES, rule 4. Please edit with more care. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:03, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jonesey95Fair. I will try to do so. It does lead to the question as to *why* AWB can be run with the various skip options on minor changes able to be turned off. But doesn't make it less needed to be watched. Naraht (talk) 15:06, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 7 February 2025

• Recent research: GPT-4 writes better edit summaries than human Wikipedians

• News and notes: Let's talk!

• Opinion: Fathoms Below, but over the moon

• In the media: Wikipedia is an extension of legacy media propaganda, says Elon Musk

• Community view: 24th Wikipedia Day in New York City

• Arbitration report: Palestine-Israel articles 5 has closed

• Traffic report: A wild drive

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * Sent manually via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:46, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Drag Race Belgique season 2 contestants has been nominated for merging

Category:Drag Race Belgique season 2 contestants has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 15:20, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Drag Race Belgique season 1 contestants has been nominated for merging

Category:Drag Race Belgique season 1 contestants has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 15:20, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Canada's Drag Race season 1 contestants

A tag has been placed on Category:Canada's Drag Race season 1 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 09:29, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Canada's Drag Race season 2 contestants

A tag has been placed on Category:Canada's Drag Race season 2 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 09:32, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Canada's Drag Race season 5 contestants

A tag has been placed on Category:Canada's Drag Race season 5 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 09:36, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Canada's Drag Race season 4 contestants

A tag has been placed on Category:Canada's Drag Race season 4 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 09:38, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Canada's Drag Race season 3 contestants

A tag has been placed on Category:Canada's Drag Race season 3 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 09:41, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Drag Race Holland season 2 contestants

A tag has been placed on Category:Drag Race Holland season 2 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 10:00, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Drag Race Holland season 1 contestants

A tag has been placed on Category:Drag Race Holland season 1 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 10:01, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 17 has been nominated for deletion

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 17 has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 10:34, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 16 has been nominated for deletion

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 16 has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 10:34, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 15 has been nominated for deletion

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 15 has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 10:35, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 14 has been nominated for deletion

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 14 has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 10:35, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 13 has been nominated for deletion

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 13 has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 10:35, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 12 has been nominated for deletion

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 12 has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 10:35, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 11 has been nominated for deletion

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 11 has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 10:35, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 10 has been nominated for deletion

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 10 has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 10:35, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 9 has been nominated for deletion

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 9 has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 10:35, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 8 has been nominated for deletion

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 8 has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 10:35, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 6 has been nominated for deletion

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 6 has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 10:35, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 4 has been nominated for deletion

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 4 has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 10:35, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 5 has been nominated for deletion

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 5 has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 10:36, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 7 has been nominated for deletion

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 7 has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 10:36, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Drag Race México season 1 contestants

A tag has been placed on Category:Drag Race México season 1 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 10:45, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Drag Race México season 2 contestants

A tag has been placed on Category:Drag Race México season 2 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 10:45, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:The Boulet Brothers' Dragula season 1 contestants

A tag has been placed on Category:The Boulet Brothers' Dragula season 1 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 11:08, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:The Boulet Brothers' Dragula season 2 contestants

A tag has been placed on Category:The Boulet Brothers' Dragula season 2 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 11:08, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:The Boulet Brothers' Dragula season 3 contestants

A tag has been placed on Category:The Boulet Brothers' Dragula season 3 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 11:09, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:The Boulet Brothers' Dragula season 4 contestants

A tag has been placed on Category:The Boulet Brothers' Dragula season 4 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 11:11, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:The Boulet Brothers' Dragula season 5 contestants

A tag has been placed on Category:The Boulet Brothers' Dragula season 5 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 11:15, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:The Boulet Brothers' Dragula season 6 contestants

A tag has been placed on Category:The Boulet Brothers' Dragula season 6 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 11:15, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:RuPaul's Drag Race Down Under season 1 contestants

A tag has been placed on Category:RuPaul's Drag Race Down Under season 1 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 11:18, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:RuPaul's Drag Race Down Under season 2 contestants

A tag has been placed on Category:RuPaul's Drag Race Down Under season 2 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 11:20, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:RuPaul's Drag Race Down Under season 3 contestants

A tag has been placed on Category:RuPaul's Drag Race Down Under season 3 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 11:24, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Drag Race Down Under season 4 contestants

A tag has been placed on Category:Drag Race Down Under season 4 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 11:24, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:RuPaul's Drag Race UK series 1 contestants

A tag has been placed on Category:RuPaul's Drag Race UK series 1 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 15:57, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:RuPaul's Drag Race UK series 2 contestants

A tag has been placed on Category:RuPaul's Drag Race UK series 2 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 16:00, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

TRACS article, History section

Hello Naraht! Just following up to see if you noticed my ping on the TRACS Talk page? I was looking to see if you had any additional feedback on my proposed TRACS History section. Again, thanks for all your help so far with improving the page! Andy at TRACS (talk) 18:07, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again! Checking in to see if you saw my answer to your question on the TRACS Talk page? Thanks Andy at TRACS (talk) 19:45, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Andy at TRACS Yes, I did, but got distracted. I'll try to get it this weekend. Since this is more complex, I'm probably going to just make larger changes related to this myself on the article and then we can go from there.Naraht (talk) 20:09, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Naraht: Thanks! Let me know if you have questions. Andy at TRACS (talk) 20:23, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Naraht: Good day, if there is anything I can answer or provide you to assist in making the larger or more complex changes, please let me know! I truly appreciate your time and efforts! Have a great day.

Andy at TRACS Don't think so, but thank you for bugging me.Naraht (talk) 23:11, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Storrs, Connecticut

An article that you have been involved in editing—Storrs, Connecticut—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Newsjunkiect (talk) 01:18, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 February 2025

• News and notes: Administrator elections up for reapproval and 1bil GET snagged on Commons

• Serendipity: Guinea-Bissau Heritage from Commons to the World

• Technology report: Hear that? The wikis go silent twice a year

• In the media: The end of the world

• Recent research: What's known about how readers navigate Wikipedia; Italian Wikipedia hardest to read

• Opinion: Sennecaster's RfA debriefing

• Tips and tricks: One year after this article is posted, will every single article on Wikipedia have a short description?

• Community view: Open letter from French Wikipedians says "no" to intimidation of volunteer contributors

• Traffic report: Temporary scars, February stars

• Essay: The source, the whole source, and nothing but the source

• Obituary: Ümüt Çınar (Kmoksy) and Vinícius Medina Kern (Vmkern)

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:29, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your 'specify for autolink' edits

Hi Naraht. I'd reviewed some of your recent edits to the "Type" parameter in the infoboxes, switching from Wikilinks to the words "Social Fraternity", etc. In the case of Ceres, which is legally a women's fraternity, it may create confusion for those who do not know that some of the women's groups use that term. Is there an option to include a template parameter redirect where these few dozen women's fraternities can be called maybe "Social Fraternity (women's)" ?

Noting also how the Type parameter works for Service fraternities, instead of the bare word "Service" it should include the word "Fraternity". It's just clearer that way. Jax MN (talk) 01:16, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jax MNI messed up on Ceres. It should have been Social Fraternity or Social Women's Fraternity. I'll fix. And as for Service, I think both Service and Service Fraternity will be displayed as the same. Fraternity and Sorority are specified for social because they'll link to different pages. And please push back on Template talk:Infobox fraternity as to what the preferred term to actually be typed. Whatever is first for a group is the preferred, I guess.Naraht (talk) 01:21, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of a group of Wikipedians to better understand their experiences! We are also looking to interview some survey respondents in more detail, and you will be eligible to receive a thank-you gift for the completion of an interview. The outcomes of this research will shape future work designed to improve on-wiki experiences.

We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this survey, which shouldn’t take more than 2-3 minutes. You may view its privacy statement here. Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Kind regards, Sam Walton (talk) 16:35, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 22 March 2025

• From the editor: Hanami

• Opinion: Talking about governments editing Wikipedia

• News and notes: Deeper look at takedowns targeting Wikipedia

• In the media: The good, the bad, and the unusual

• Recent research: Explaining the disappointing history of Flagged Revisions; and what's the impact of ChatGPT on Wikipedia so far?

• Traffic report: All the world's a stage, we are merely players...

• Gallery: WikiPortraits rule!

• Essay: Unusual biographical images

• Obituary: Rest in peace

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:06, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 9 April 2025

• Special report: Wikipedian and physician Ziyad al-Sufiani reportedly released from Saudi prison

• In focus: WMF to explore "common standards" for NPOV policies; implications for project autonomy remain unclear

• In the media: Indian judges demand removal of content critical of Asian News International

• News and notes: 35,000 user accounts compromised, locked in attempted credential-stuffing attack

• Op-ed: How crawlers impact the operations of the Wikimedia projects

• Opinion: Crawlers, hogs and gorillas

• Debriefing: Giraffer's RfA debriefing

• Obituary: RHaworth, TomCat4680 and PawełMM

• Traffic report: Heigh-Ho, Heigh-Ho, off to report we go...

• News from Diff: Strengthening Wikipedia’s neutral point of view

• Comix: Thirteen

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:22, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol May 2025 Backlog drive

May 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 May 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Pages Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:25, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Battle of the Blades professionals has been nominated for deletion

Category:Battle of the Blades professionals has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 07:47, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Battle of the Blades season 6 participants has been nominated for deletion

Category:Battle of the Blades season 6 participants has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 07:47, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Battle of the Blades season 5 participants has been nominated for deletion

Category:Battle of the Blades season 5 participants has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 07:47, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Battle of the Blades season 4 participants has been nominated for deletion

Category:Battle of the Blades season 4 participants has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 07:47, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Battle of the Blades season 3 participants has been nominated for deletion

Category:Battle of the Blades season 3 participants has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 07:47, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Battle of the Blades season 2 participants has been nominated for deletion

Category:Battle of the Blades season 2 participants has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 07:47, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Battle of the Blades season 1 participants has been nominated for deletion

Category:Battle of the Blades season 1 participants has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 07:47, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Battle of the Blades templates

A tag has been placed on Category:Battle of the Blades templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 07:57, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 May 2025

• News and notes: India cut off from Wiki money; WMF annual plan and Wikimedia programs seek comment

• In the media: Feds aiming for WMF's nonprofit status

• Recent research: How readers use Wikipedia health content; Scholars generally happy with how their papers are cited on Wikipedia

• Arbitration report: Sysop Tinucherian removed and admonished by the ArbCom

• Discussion report: Latest news from Centralized discussions

• Traffic report: Of Wolf and Man

• Disinformation report: At WikiCredCon, Wikipedia editors and Internet Archive discuss threats to trust in media

• News from the WMF: Product & Tech Progress on the Annual Plan

• Humour: Crisis erupts as furious admins, functionaries complain about crappy t-shirts

• Comix: By territory

• In focus: Using AI on the Russian Wikipedia: opportunities or challenges?

• Community view: A deep dive into Wikimedia

• Debriefing: Barkeep49's RfB debriefing

• Gallery: Meet the winners of Wiki Loves Monuments 2024

• Obituary: JarrahTree, JohnClarknew and Yashthepunisher

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:18, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vancouver Law School

Hello, Naraht. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vancouver Law School, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:07, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Extraction issue

I found a PDF history of Phi Alpha Delta that lists of all chapters (law school, alumnni/gradaute, and pre-law chapters). However, the lists are in alphabetical order by school name, rather than the chapter name or charter date. This data should be perfect for a drop into Excel so that it can be sorted correctly before creating an article. However, I have been unable to extract the data in its rows, despite that fact that it is clearly in rows in the PDF. Can you take a look and see if you can figure out how to make this work? These lists are too long to manually create IMO. Here is a link to the PDF, with the lists being on pages 195-206. Thanks. Also, just realized we live near each other--I am a couple of house away from D.C. in the valley of Virginia. Rublamb (talk) 17:51, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rublamb If it helps identify where I am, Connecticut Avenue and Georgia Avenue eventually cross about 7 miles north of the DC line. I can walk to that crossing from my house.

The PDF is particularly wierd in that if you try to copy a chunk from that section, the partial pages (200 & 203), grab everything from one column before moving to the next while all of the full pages grab rows. I'll see what I can do. Oddly, my Linux environment and vi may prove more useful. At worst, I expect comma delimited, which we can make what we want. What order do you want? We also have a lot of information on the changes of names and locations in the area around 114.

Rublamb Initial pull of the law school chapters at User:Naraht/PDD1. Let me know how you want it massaged. May need a slightly different tack on the other ones. I have my corporate version of Excel, so all of the bells and whistles on bringing it in, once I had the tabs in the appropriate places.Naraht (talk) 02:44, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank goodness you could get it to work! I would like to sort into charter date order. I had not noticed the crazy format of the college names. I guess we can use text to column (at the comma) and concatenate to reassemble in the correct format? Rublamb (talk) 03:04, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

First time I did it, I had it in charter date order. I deliberately sliced off the City/State at the hyphen. Not sure much can be done by the editor to put the school names back together like "Bridgeport, University of, School of Law". I reordered it, check now.Naraht (talk) 03:26, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for getting into charter order. Yeah, since not all college names have the unusual format, my suggestion above will not work. But fixing a few names is nothing compared to manually entering the data. Rublamb (talk) 03:32, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Got all of the University of switched around, uploading.Naraht (talk) 03:33, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

two entries that are William O. Douglas, charter may have moved or split more info likely elsewhere in the doc. But unless you want me to automate adding the square brackets to the Namesake, not sure what else can be automated, looking for suggestions.Naraht (talk) 03:37, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Date templates? Rublamb (talk) 03:41, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You mean dts? Already there. when I put it into excel, I made the format for the dates {{\d\t\s|yyyy|mm|dd}} which dropped them in correctly. :)Naraht (talk) 03:44, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect. Rublamb (talk) 03:46, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Did one more fix, something was wrong with how Saint John's University came over , the single quote turned into 3 or 4 characters. Wierd.Naraht (talk) 03:52, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rublamb added brackets to all of the honorees. Some need to be dabbed, others are redlinks. I'll start looking at them.Naraht (talk) 17:16, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Secondary school honor society founders has been nominated for merging

Category:Secondary school honor society founders has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 04:28, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 May 2025

• News and notes: WMF to kick off new-CEO quest as Iskandar preps to move on — Supreme Court nixes gag of Wiki page for other India court row on ANI — code-heads give fix-up date for Charts in lieu of long-dead Graph gizmo

• In the media: Wikimedia Foundation sues over UK government decision that might require identity verification of editors worldwide

• Disinformation report: What does Jay-Z know about Wikipedia?

• In focus: On the hunt for sources: Swedish AfD discussions

• Technology report: WMF introduces unique but privacy-preserving browser cookie

• Debriefing: Goldsztajn's RfA debriefing

• Obituary: Max Lum (User:ICOHBuzz)

• Community view: A Deep Dive Into Wikimedia (part 2)

• Comix: Collection

• From the archives: Humor from the Archives

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:58, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	For helping with the Phi Alpha Delta data. I would still be manually entering it. Rublamb (talk) 18:15, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]