User talk:NapoliRoma

I'm a big fan of keeping an entire discussion in one place, so unless otherwise requested or noted, I'll reply here to anything started here. Similarly, if a discussion was started elsewhere, I'd prefer to continue it there, but if that's something you're rabidly against, I'm easy.

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Politrukki (talk) 00:00, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Office of the Former President moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Office of the Former President, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. This page needs correct sourcing, expanded text and just generally a lot of work before it is ready for the mainspace. Please develop this article more and get some help before you submit it to the mainspace again. Nightenbelle (talk) 18:44, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @Nightenbelle: -- this is an article I created that got (correctly, IMHO) turned into a redirect, but then got co-opted by another editor who added entirely new content. You've probably noticed that it's already been recreated by another editor (and deleted again, and recreated, if I'm reading the history correctly) and the war is back on... .

In any event, the content that's currently in draftspace is not mine, nor do I think it needs to be preserved (although it would probably be appropriate to restore the edit history to the original article).

If the edit history can't be salvaged, I think the draftspace version should be deleted. Are either of these something you can do, or guide me on doing myself? Thanks, NapoliRoma (talk) 23:47, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Office of the Former President for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Office of the Former President is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Office of the Former President until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

– Muboshgu (talk) 00:48, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Patent (disambiguation) cleanup

Thanks! Turns out one of the detailed statements wasn't even correct (the botany glossary says the term means 45–50°, not 90°). DMacks (talk) 21:19, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ernest Granville Booth moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ernest Granville Booth, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 13:03, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ernest Granville Booth has been accepted

Ernest Granville Booth, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– robertsky (talk) 01:01, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict...please fill out my survey?

Hello :) I am writing my MA dissertation on Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict, and I noticed that you have contributed to those pages. My dissertation will look at the process of collaborative knowledge production on the Israel-Palestine conflict, and the effect it has on bias in the articles. This will involve understanding the profiles and motivations of editors, contention/controversy and dispute resolution in the talk pages, and bias in the final article.

For more information, you can check out my meta-wiki research page or my user page, where I will be posting my findings when I am done.

I would greatly appreciate if you could take 5 minutes to fill out this quick survey before 8 August 2021.

Participation in this survey is entirely voluntary and anonymous. There are no foreseeable risks nor benefits to you associated with this project.

Thanks so much,

Sarah Sanbar

Sarabnas ^{I'm researching Wikipedia} _Questions? 20:49, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of ships damaged by kamikaze attack for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of ships damaged by kamikaze attack, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of ships damaged by kamikaze attack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American convicts who became writers has been nominated for deletion

Category:American convicts who became writers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:50, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

grunts and groans

In context, grunts are ordinary soldiers; groans is a play on the ambiguity. —Tamfang (talk) 04:31, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ahmed Naji, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Egyptian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chai Lee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Framewave logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Framewave logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions, por favor

NapoliRoma (talk) 02:42, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
35	Culver–Stockton College (talk)	Add sources
314	Head East (talk)	Add sources
35	Live sound mixing (talk)	Add sources
58	Stage monitor system (talk)	Add sources
5	Outbound Travel Alert System (talk)	Add sources
33	Wire Train (talk)	Add sources
180	Cyclone Tracy (talk)	Cleanup
380	International Traffic in Arms Regulations (talk)	Cleanup
1,512	FedEx (talk)	Cleanup
94	Playa Vista, Los Angeles (talk)	Expand
81	Newington College (talk)	Expand
416	Marina del Rey, California (talk)	Expand
307	Speedcubing (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
431	Volkswagen Amarok (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
111	Export of cryptography from the United States (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
73	Sweet roll (talk)	Merge
527	Intentional community (talk)	Merge
3,711	United States National Security Council (talk)	Merge
1,483	Cuneiform (talk)	Wikify
1,507	Taco Bell (talk)	Wikify
1,582	Gatwick Airport (talk)	Wikify
5	Chīsai-ojisan (talk)	Orphan
7	Occupational infectious disease (talk)	Orphan
5	Commercial use of Wikimedia projects (talk)	Orphan
3	Kansas City Cold Storage Company Building (talk)	Stub
31	Portrait of Tracy (talk)	Stub
8	Troféu Imprensa (talk)	Stub
9	Department of Plant Protection (talk)	Stub
8	WKEY-FM (talk)	Stub
7	Shadow Theater (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:46, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of San Diego Daily Journal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article San Diego Daily Journal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/San Diego Daily Journal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Eric Schucht (talk) 03:58, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited San Diego Daily Journal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Republican.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gelato (software) (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aesurias was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gelato (software) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Aesurias (talk) 21:35, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]