User talk:Mbeksana

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Mbeksana, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Patience Nombeko Mbava, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! CycloneYoris talk! 08:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Patience Nombeko Mbava

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Patience Nombeko Mbava, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CycloneYoris talk! 08:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Patience Mbava

[edit]
Notice

The article Patience Mbava has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. CycloneYoris talk! 21:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Information icon Please do not introduce links in actual articles to user pages or sandboxes, as you did at Patience Mbava. Since these pages have not been accepted as articles, user pages, sandboxes and drafts are not suitable for linking in articles. and such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been deleted, please do not re-add any such links, thank you - Arjayay (talk) 21:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]

Please read and follow Help:Referencing for beginners when adding references to your article, which I have moved to Draft:Patience Mbava, as it is not ready for article space. - Arjayay (talk) 21:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Financial and Fiscal Commission

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Mbeksana. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Financial and Fiscal Commission, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:09, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Financial and Fiscal Commission

[edit]

Hello, Mbeksana. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Financial and Fiscal Commission".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:39, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Patience Mbava

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Mbeksana. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Patience Mbava, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:07, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Patience Mbava

[edit]

Hello, Mbeksana. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Patience Mbava".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 21:24, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

[edit]

Your new article Financial and Fiscal Commission (South Africa) is not displaying properly, due to the inappropriate use of the nowiki tag. Please take those out. Thank you, Jessicapierce (talk) 15:31, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello the page is legitimate and is for the Financial and Fiscal Commission which is a constitutional institution of South Africa. All the facts therein are true and legitimate. I welcome you suggestion on how to improve the page. Thanks Mbeksana (talk) 19:26, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Jlwoodwa. An article that you recently made, Financial and Fiscal Commission (South Africa), seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or another application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. In particular, you should check each citation, and fictitious references must be removed. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. jlwoodwa (talk) 17:16, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello the page is legitimate and is for the Financial and Fiscal Commission which is a constitutional institution of South Africa. All the facts therein are true and legitimate. I welcome you suggestion on how to improve the page. Thanks Mbeksana (talk) 19:25, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Mbeksana. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Financial and Fiscal Commission (South Africa), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. /over.throws/✎ 18:19, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Patience Nombeko Mbava moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Patience Nombeko Mbava. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ponyobons mots 19:36, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Financial and Fiscal Commission (South Africa) moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Financial and Fiscal Commission (South Africa). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ponyobons mots 19:37, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Information icon

Hello Mbeksana. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mbeksana. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Mbeksana|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. -- Ponyobons mots 19:39, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Financial and Fiscal Commission (South Africa) (September 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MCE89 were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
MCE89 (talk) 14:43, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Mbeksana! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MCE89 (talk) 14:43, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Financial and Fiscal Commission (South Africa) (September 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 20:36, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Financial and Fiscal Commission (South Africa) (September 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
RangersRus (talk) 15:24, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]