User talk:Kuirfoy

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

September 2025

[edit]
icon
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kuirfoy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here I would like to respectfully appeal my block. I want to make it very clear that I have no connection whatsoever to the banned user(s) listed in the reasoning for my block. I am not a sockpuppet and have never used multiple accounts. The subject I created an article about is a notable actor. The article had previously existed and was even approved by administrators before being deleted solely because it was associated with a banned user. That has nothing to do with me. I independently researched and drafted a new version, using reliable sources and writing in a neutral, encyclopedic tone. My draft is well-sourced, not promotional, and in line with Wikipedia’s standards.

I have also been active in improving other biographies on Wikipedia, and my edits have always been in good faith. The only connection between myself and the deleted article is that I previously made edits to the active wikipedia, because he is in Caught Stealing. I saw it had been removed and was already in the process of drafting a new biography.

There is no evidence that I am connected to any banned user, and I am not. I simply have an interest in documenting film and television figures, especially ones related to a movie I follow. That is the full extent of it.

I kindly ask for my block to be reconsidered. I am here to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia and respect Wikipedia’s rules and community guidelines. Thank you for your time and consideration.

Decline reason:

The claim that you are unrelated to Alexwrightman12344 is not credible. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:09, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Information icon Hello! Thank you for your recent contributions to Cary Christopher. I did have one note for you. I am working on a maintenance project to clean up Category:Pages using infoboxes with thumbnail images. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks!! Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 00:48, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

oh sorry thanks for letting me know had no idea Kuirfoy (talk) 00:50, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi Kuirfoy! I noticed your contributions to Cary Christopher and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 00:48, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thanks so much, trying to just help out the community Kuirfoy (talk) 00:50, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manhood (TV Series) (September 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Unfortunately, I cannot find any sources that can be used for notability. The sources presented in the draft are mainly PR (press releases, churnalism, etc.). Even the ones that appear to be in-depth are non-bylined or in blogs or otherwise unreliable sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
CNMall41 (talk) 19:08, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Kuirfoy! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CNMall41 (talk) 19:08, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
yea, I figured I only could find sources on the lead being in it nothing, nothing solo about the title. if I do find something I will updated. If possible can you review my article I wrote on Draft:Nikita Kukushkin? Kuirfoy (talk) 19:15, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:00, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]