User talk:Keironoshea

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

File permission problem with File:TonyrefailWelfareLogo.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:TonyrefailWelfareLogo.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:30, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Keironoshea! Your additions to Annie Powell have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. MCE89 (talk) 10:09, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Funningly enough, I've just researched how and when to use quotes. I've fixed the missing citation that you removed, so we should be good. Keironoshea (talk) 10:13, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Keironoshea. Thank you for your work on Harry Dobson (International Brigades). Another editor, Tony Holkham, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Very interesting; just a few more citations needed.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Tony Holkham}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Tony Holkham (Talk) 12:52, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Tony Holkham: thank you. I am currently in the middle of reading Welshmen in the Spanish Civil War by Hywel Francis and will come back soon to add more citations. Keironoshea (talk) 21:31, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi - a quick note about this, Rhondda Sports Centre. For me there are a few issues with the article:

  • Tone - Wikipedia doesn't exist to promote things, and a promotional phrase like "Rhondda Sports Centre stands as a beacon of fitness and well-being in the heart of Gelligaled Park, offering a diverse range of facilities tailored to meet the needs of its community" shouldn't be used:
  • Copyright - moreover, it's a Copyright Violation (CV) as it is a direct lift from the source which says, "Rhondda Sports Centre stands as a beacon of fitness and well-being in the heart of Geligaled Park, offering a diverse range of facilities tailored to meet the needs of its community". There is the same problem with Source 3 and Source 6. As explained above, you can't copy blocks of text from other sources and post them on Wikipedia. They need to be redrafted in your own words;
  • Sourcing - We need to use Reliable Sources that are independent of the subject. Sources 2, 3, 7 aren't reliable, and 4, 5, 6 aren't independent. So you really only have one source;
  • Notability - With only one source, which actually covers the history of the site, not the centre, I don't think the Notability requirements are met. You really need a minimum of 2/3 reliable, independent sources.

Hope these suggestions are helpful. The article certainly needs a re-write/better sourcing. KJP1 (talk) 09:33, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,
Thank you so much for taking the time to provide such detailed and constructive feedback on the Rhondda Sports Centre article. This was actually the first Wikipedia page I've created, and I've learnt an enormous amount over the past couple of days.
You were absolutely right on all points:
Tone & Copyright: I've completely rewritten the article to remove all promotional language and copyright violations. The "beacon of fitness" phrase and other lifted text have been replaced with neutral, encyclopaedic content written in my own words.
Sourcing: I've removed all the unreliable sources (business directories, venue booking sites, etc.) and non-independent sources (council websites, promotional materials). The article now uses only reliable, independent sources.
Notability: I've managed to find additional sources, including a local history book by John May ("Rhondda 1203-2003: The Story of the Two Valleys") and coverage from Sports Management Magazine about the £6 million refurbishment. This has helped me to establish proper historical context and demonstrate the significance beyond just being a routine leisure centre.
The article is now much improved and focuses on the historical development from the 1930s Miners' Welfare Fund lido through to the 1975 £1 million sports centre and 2008 major refurbishment, all properly sourced and written neutrally.
Thank you for your patience with a newcomer! Keironoshea (talk) Keironoshea (talk) 21:13, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It’s a big improvement. Well done, and enjoy Wikipedia. KJP1 (talk) 21:34, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am :D Keironoshea (talk) 21:35, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Keironoshea. Thank you for your work on Frank Owen (International Brigades). Another editor, Tony Holkham, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Well done; another fascinating article about the Sp Civil War.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Tony Holkham}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Tony Holkham (Talk) 13:32, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Keironoshea. Thank you for your work on Lle'r Gaer. Another editor, Kudpung, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Please repair the syntax of one reference.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Kudpung}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:10, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 2025

[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Darren Millar has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:55, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Torolv Solheim. When you were adding content to the page, you added duplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in red at the top of the page. Thanks. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:42, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment rationales

[edit]

Helo, thank you for conducting assessments on various articles. I appreciate the effort, but as assessments are naturally subjective to the editor (some projects may be more strict with them, but most are largely the same) as long as you followed the criteria faithfully and the rating can be justified then just rate it and move onto the next one.

For the rationales, just leave the ones you've written up so far, in the end you spent the effort and appreciate that! The rationales aren't wrong, but most of the time editors don't write them, unless the/your assessment has been disputed. Although it can be seen as potentially praise and encouragement for any new articles made by new editors so not a bad thing. Plus your rationales may raise good points on how to improve the article! If you wish to remove them though, as long as no one has commented on it (so not at Talk:Net World Sports) then you can self-revert, but there is no actual issue with it, just that there's no need to spend so much time on them in most cases.

Once again, nothing wrong with writing rationales, but they're not really done and well there is so much more of everything else to do! Diolch. DankJae 22:33, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@DankJae I'm both happy that I don't have to do them and disappointed at the time I wasted writing them! I'll bullet point my reasoning and if anyone asks about an assessment I'll be ready to respond. thank you for your patience. Keironoshea (talk) 22:37, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There is always a backlog of assessments, so the first priority is to rate them (which you have done! thanks), and make sure existing articles have had their assessments updated if they've been re-written. Of course the only time you do have to provide some sort of rationale (or discuss it) is for the highest ratings, A-class, Good Article-class and Featured Article-class. Anything B-class below is really less strict and subjective of an editor. DankJae 22:44, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Neil Kinnock, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Norman Hogg and Derek Foster. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:16, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Duncan Ferguson

[edit]

Hi Keironoshea. I ran across Duncan Ferguson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) and am wondering if it would be best if all your recent edits to it were rolled back given the numerous poor sources. Do you have time to review all the sources you used against WP:RSP and WP:RSN, and remove all that are not up to WP:BLP criteria? --Hipal (talk) 21:06, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notice. I've taken a look and many of the 'poor' references that were in there existed prior to my work. I have, as of now, fixed many of them barre one YouTube source that upon listening did seem to cover what was said in the direct quotation. It wasn't my work, but I feel like it added a substantive element to the article given Ferguson's personality at the time. Thanks for your patience, but wanted to make sure I did it well. BW Keironoshea (talk) 10:21, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Duncan Ferguson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NTL.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Closing an AfD

[edit]

Hi there, I saw your recent AfD where you intended to withdraw and didn't know how - you may be interested in installing Wikipedia:XFDcloser. Makes this easy.

By the way, thanks for volunteering at AfC (I'm about to accept your request). I was intrigued to see that you had such an old account, and was wondering what motivation brought you back to the project after so long away. A worthy one, I think. Not terribly unlike my own. You may be interested in joining WP:@, a small and close-knit wikiproject where you'd be very welcome. Cheers. -- asilvering (talk) 20:51, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

The Miners' Next Step
added links pointing to Dai Smith and Paul Foot
Angela Rayner housing controversy
added a link pointing to Liberal Democrats
Torolv Solheim
added a link pointing to Brevik
Welsh Socialist Republican Movement
added a link pointing to British Steel

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wow.

[edit]

You disrespect the dead, you keep breaking copyright laws.

What in the flip is wrong with you, son?

You definitely went on r/wikipedia, to find articles to vandalize. We know people like you.

But vandalizing articles of a dead person. That is disgusting of you, you should be ashamed of yourself. Shrekipedia69 (talk) 19:39, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, what? Keironoshea (talk) 19:41, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Javier Polo

[edit]

Javier Polo article is not primary but secondary websites, newspapers that explain he is the president of a National Association, regional government websites as Xunta de Galicia referring to the prizes he won, and others. 83.52.38.125 (talk) 12:01, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]