User talk:Kaworu1992

Translation

Hello! Strange request here, but an article about me and my Wikipedia work has been promoted to Good article status at English Wikipedia. I'm curious if you have any interest in translating the entry for Polish Wikipedia? Figured I'd ask since your profile suggests you do translation work. Either way, happy editing! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 17:53, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just checking in here! I'm curious if there's a way to submit the draft for editors to review, similar to Wikipedia:Articles for creation? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 15:50, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Zofia Marchewka has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Zofia Marchewka. Thanks! ANU^writes 16:14, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zofia Marchewka (March 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Afyaniuhai was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Zofia Marchewka instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

An article with the same name exists in the mainspace, see Zofia Marchewka

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zofia Marchewka and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ANU^writes 16:15, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kaworu1992! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ANU^writes 16:15, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Warsaw Gay Movement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kanada. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Zofia Marchewka

Hello, Kaworu1992. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zofia Marchewka, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:06, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Zofia Marchewka

Hello, Kaworu1992. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Zofia Marchewka".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:57, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Let them see us moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Let them see us. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:11, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Kaworu1992! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Cypher System article?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:21, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Kaworu1992! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Pygame - tutorials in external links?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:35, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Let them see us (December 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Let them see us and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 12:01, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Let them see us has been accepted

Let them see us, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 23:05, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Attributing translations

Hi, and thank you for your work on Let them see us! Minor note: When translating from other wikipedias, please mention somewhere (edit summary works great) where the original text comes from. This is required for copyright reasons. Rusalkii (talk) 23:11, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Kaworu1992! The thread you created at the Teahouse, GPS data for a college in Poland, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your Poland-related contributions

Hello and welcome Kaworu1992! Thank you for your contributions related to Poland. You may be interested in visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland, joining the project, joining our discussions and sharing your creations with our community.

Grumpylawnchair (talk) 18:58, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cypher article

Hi Kaworu1992, I'm dropping by here because Teahouse threads get archived pretty quickly. (I replied to you during my lunch break yesterday, then went back to work, then immediately into my Starfinder game where we finished a big boss battle ⚔️) I haven't done much editing in the TTRPG area so I had a look at the current guidelines at WP:RPG. I was interested to see the comments about difficulty finding good § Sources which lines up with your experience. It's fine to reference sources in other languages if they are reliable; if you use direct quotes it's helpful to provide an English translation. The citation templates that we use here have parameters for specifying non-English-language sources – see the documentation at Help:Citation Style 1 § Language. I might have more time to look at your draft over the weekend, and you can also visit the WikiProject's talk page if you want other RPG fans to have a look. — ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 22:43, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User space drafts

Hi Kaworu, I've cleaned up a few of your user space drafts for grammar and double-checked translation (fair warning - I'm not a native Polish speaker but am a native English speaker) so far, do you mind if I continue this? Feel free to revert my edits if you disagree with my changes. Best regards, Grumpylawnchair (talk) 02:26, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The World Destubathon

Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It started today on Monday June 16 and will run until Sunday July 13. There is over $3300 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for subjects which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested. Even if you can only manage a few articles they would be very much appreciated and help make the content produced as diverse and broad as possible!♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:47, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Kaworu1992! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Biographical data directly from the person?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:12, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cypher System (June 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rambley was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

BlogSpot, WordPress and YouTube are not reliable sources. Many of the article's sources are primary sources (all originating from the same book) and many of the other sources seem to just focus on the rulebook rather than the game itself.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cypher System and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rambley (talk) 12:23, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nox Archaist (July 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Steam Powered is not a reliable independent source and Lemmert's book is a primary source, and not independent either.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nox Archaist and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:13, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

When a topic is encyclopedic

Hello Kaworu1992, Some time ago, you, an extended-confirmed user with a 15-year-old account, approximately a dozen created articles (and more extensive experience contributing to an edition of Wikipedia in another language), asked editors at Teahouse—an interactive help page for new users to be welcomed and get the most basic answers—if the topic of Nox Archaist is encyclopedic (link). You had also written a draft about this topic. The content of the draft did not at all indicate that the topic is encyclopedic. An AfC reviewer declined the draft. However, after my investigation, I was able to determine quite easily within minutes that, yes, the topic is encyclopedic. Subsequent to that, I edited the draft so that it speaks to its subject's notability, and have moved it to article space.

I am writing to you now simply to tell you that you could have, just as easily as I did, confirmed yourself that the topic is encyclopedic by investigating if there are adequate sources that help prove notability.

Proving that the topic is notable is how editors determine if the topic is encyclopedic. Editors do this by following the Wikipedia:Notability guideline. Your questions at the Teahouse suggest you seem unfamiliar with this guideline (perhaps you know that a guideline titled "Notability" exists but do not know what it says and what its purpose is). The statements in our articles need to be verifiable using what has already been published about the topic. When we can locate multiple sources that are reliable, contain significant coverage, and are independent of the subject of the article, practically any topic can be treated encyclopedically. This principle is famously called WP:GNG. The question "Is [topic] encyclopedic" is answered by answering the question: "Is [subject] a notable topic?"

Adequate sourcing for this topic was accessible on the Internet, yet it seems as if you hadn't even looked for such sources (except for finding the Vice article). You were instead focused on a book written by the creator of Nox Archaist. Citing this non-independent source, you added statements such as: Nox Archaist features many innovations and achievments, such as ... the spells' animations also are atypical for an 8-bit game and quite advanced. Based on such a source, making such a statement was quite unencyclopedic. It would have only been encyclopedic if an independent reviewer wrote that in their review.

The same applies to your draft Draft:Cypher System, another draft that an AfC reviewer declined. It could very well be that this is a notable topic, but your draft does not at all suggest to other editors that it is.

Therefore I am leaving this message on your talk page, simply to give you a suggestion to study the notability guideline.

Sincerely, —Alalch E. 13:47, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Kaworu1992! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Scratch21 article?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:06, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Kaworu1992! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Villee's Biology article?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:06, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]