User talk:JohnMizuki

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rodolfo Camacho Viera has been accepted

[edit]
Rodolfo Camacho Viera, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

gobonobo + c 14:33, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on De Daemonialitate et Incubis et Succubis

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page De Daemonialitate et Incubis et Succubis, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:31, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Belzeba (November 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
It does not seem to pass WP:GNG, with too few reliable sources to indicate standalone notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 06:14, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Belzeba

[edit]

Information icon Hello, JohnMizuki. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Belzeba, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:04, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Going Ape for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Going Ape is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Going Ape until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

voorts (talk/contributions) 03:40, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Belzeba

[edit]

Hello, JohnMizuki. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Belzeba".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:52, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Xi Van Fleet

[edit]

Information icon Hello, JohnMizuki. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Xi Van Fleet, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Xi Van Fleet

[edit]

Hello, JohnMizuki. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Xi Van Fleet".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:15, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Domingo Prat has been accepted

[edit]
Domingo Prat, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Baqi:) (talk) 13:53, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Bryce and Son has been accepted

[edit]
David Bryce and Son, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 21:52, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jules Lachelier has been accepted

[edit]
Jules Lachelier, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 14:43, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uğurcan Yüce (February 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Significa liberdade was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:37, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, JohnMizuki! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:37, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pierre Mesnard

[edit]

Information icon Hello, JohnMizuki. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pierre Mesnard, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:06, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]


I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi JohnMizuki. Thank you for your work on Bernardino Scardeone. Another editor, Ingratis, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article. I noticed that it includes translation of part of the equivalent article on it:Wiki. There is absolutely nothing wrong with this! quite the contrary. However, translations from other Wikis do need to be attributed (I've done that for this article). Take a look at Help:Translation § Licensing for further information. Best wishes.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ingratis}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

@Ingratis: There must be a misunderstanding, I didn't translate from the Italian article, as it is unsourced.

I'm sorry if I've misunderstood. The section "Early life" in the English article is extremely similar to the first two paragraphs of the section "Origini e formazioni" in the Italian one. May I take it that you translated from the Dizionario biografico? The Italian article does also acknowledge this as a source (in fact, its only source), although not in the form of an inline citation. Ingratis (talk) 12:53, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: On the Demonomania of the Sorcerers has been accepted

[edit]
On the Demonomania of the Sorcerers, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~ L 🌸 (talk) 16:47, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Trinidad Huerta

[edit]

Is this translated from the equivalent article on the Spanish Wikipedia? if so, would you please add the attribution as above, as I see you have recently been doing to your other translations.

For clarity, translation from other Wikipedias is fine as long as it is correctly attributed (but see below). Copying or translating from public domain sources is similarly fine if attributed. Copying, translating or close paraphrasing from copyright sources (such as the Treccani website, for example) is not OK - WP:CLOSEPARAPHRASE. This also applies to articles on other Wikipedias if they are copyright violations. Ingratis (talk) 12:54, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I wrote both articles, the one in Spanish and the one in English. JohnMizuki (talk) 12:57, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oh OK, fair enough! I'll add a note to the talk page to stop anyone else bothering you about attribution (not that that's very likely). Best wishes, Ingratis (talk) 17:58, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi JohnMizuki. Thank you for your work on Trinidad Huerta. Another editor, Ingratis, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for this interesting article. I note that you are also the author of the equivalent article on the Spanish Wikipedia. Best wishes,

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ingratis}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ingratis (talk) 18:01, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Carlos García (pianist)

[edit]

Hello, JohnMizuki,

Thank you for creating Carlos García (pianist).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Life part is not well references

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Old-AgedKid}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Old-AgedKid (talk) 14:05, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Old-AgedKid: The article is very recent. I'm still working on it. JohnMizuki (talk) 14:09, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Fight League

[edit]

Hello, JohnMizuki,

I had to fix the formatting on this AFD and I'd like to encourage you to use Twinkle any time you nominate an article/page for any type of deletion (CSD, PROD, AFD/RFD/CFD/etc.). It's a very easy-to-use editing tool and means that you don't have to search for the right templates to use. It also notifies the article creator and leaves an appropriate edit summary. Twinkle is used by most page patrollers and administrators because it makes few mistakes and I'd advise you to give it a try. Thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 22:10, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I didn't know about that tool, very appreciated. JohnMizuki (talk) 22:34, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Writer's Barnstar
For all the biography articles of musicians you're working on! Kj cheetham (talk) 11:40, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
My first Barnstar! Thanks! :) JohnMizuki (talk) 11:44, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sure it won't be the last. :-) -Kj cheetham (talk) 11:47, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Latin music invitation

[edit]
You are invited to join invite to join the WikiProject Latin music, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and languages of Ibero-America. Simply click here to accept! Or, if you're interested in reading more on Latin music, you may want to check out the Latin music portal.

I've noticed your contributions to tango musicians and thought you might be interested! Erick (talk) 16:45, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Just joined :) JohnMizuki (talk) 17:05, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Biography articles

[edit]

Hi there, as a quick tip, please add |blp=no to the banner shell on the talk page of articles of people who aren't alive (BLP=biography of living person). I try to do that myself when I spot them, e.g. at Talk:Alberto Amor, as they get flagged at Category:Biography articles without blp parameter. Keep up the good work overall! -Kj cheetham (talk) 08:59, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I didn't know about that, thanks! JohnMizuki (talk) 09:01, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled granted

[edit]

Hi JohnMizuki, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Chetsford (talk) 16:06, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Thanks! :) JohnMizuki (talk) 16:07, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New page reviewer granted

[edit]

Hi JohnMizuki, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! signed, Rosguill talk 15:24, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! JohnMizuki (talk) 15:28, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A belated welcome onboard. :-) -Kj cheetham (talk) 22:21, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Upcoming expiry of your patroller right

[edit]

Hi, this is an automated reminder as part of Global reminder bot to let you know that your permission "patroller" (New page reviewers) will expire on 00:00, 10 July 2025 (UTC). For most rights, you will need to renew at WP:PERM, unless you have been told otherwise when your right was approved. To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself to m:Global reminder bot/Exclusion. Leaderbot (talk) 19:42, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Update to Rock Ridge High School

[edit]

Hello, I have added more credible sources and additional information on the notability of the building itself for Rock Ridge High School (Virginia, MN). That said, please review and check my sources for credibility. Wolverinebus (talk) 13:48, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New page reviewer granted

[edit]

Hi JohnMizuki, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! signed, Rosguill talk 15:29, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uğurcan Yüce (July 30)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Potentially notable, but you need to add more references that show that his life and work has been written about in depth by multiple, reliable, independent publications. Reliable excludes for example websites that can be edited by anyone such as discussion boards.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:12, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol September 2025 Backlog drive

[edit]
September 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 September 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:31, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cuarto azul for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cuarto azul, which you previously marked as reviewed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuarto azul until a consensus is reached, and you are welcomed to contribute to the discussion.SodiumBot (botop|talk) 10:44, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

These updates are delivered by SodiumBot. To opt out of these messages, add {{User:SodiumBot/NoNPPDelivery}} to your talk page.

Nomination of 2024 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 Nobel Prize in Chemistry, which you previously marked as reviewed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Nobel Prize in Chemistry until a consensus is reached, and you are welcomed to contribute to the discussion.SodiumBot (botop|talk) 10:44, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

These updates are delivered by SodiumBot. To opt out of these messages, add {{User:SodiumBot/NoNPPDelivery}} to your talk page.

September 2025 NPP backlog drive – Points award

[edit]
The Invisible Barnstar
This award is given in recognition to JohnMizuki for accumulating at least 5 points the September 2025 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 19,000+ articles reviewed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Utopes (talk / cont) 03:55, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Very appreciated :) JohnMizuki (talk) 14:55, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]