User talk:HazelAlbertSheriff

Connie Francis cover versions

[edit]

Please read WP:SONGCOVER which sets a high bar to inclusion. Binksternet (talk) 12:07, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Games That Lovers Play (album) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. CycloneYoris talk! 20:35, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Me Again moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, I'm Me Again, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 23:47, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:I'm Me Again has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:I'm Me Again. Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 23:48, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: I'm Me Again (May 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bakhtar40 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails to meet WP:NSONG
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Bakhtar40 (talk) 10:16, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, HazelAlbertSheriff! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bakhtar40 (talk) 10:16, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: I'm Me Again (June 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft needs sources which discusses the song in detail. Currently, all the sources are just song lists.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Ca talk to me! 07:05, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mame (song) moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Mame (song). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Unreliable source . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Allblessed (talk) 14:50, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Little Green Apples (cover art).png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Little Green Apples (cover art).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited You Ain't Heard Nothin' Yet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Walter Donaldson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Discography assessments

[edit]

Hi, thank you for trying to classify discography pages that have remained unassessed. Note that the class should be based on the quality and length of the prose section not by the number of releases the artist has had. One sentence of prose in the lead section is considered a stub, and it doesn't matter if someone has 50 releases or 500 releases. The listing of the albums, singles, etc. is just that, a list, and is independent of the actual content provided which is what the classification is based upon. Cheers. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 18:15, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I understand now, thanks. HazelAlbertSheriff (talk) 18:25, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Gale Garnett
added a link pointing to God Bless the Child
Go Like Elijah
added a link pointing to Thunder and Lightning

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Movie Greats of the 60s, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Reardon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi HazelAlbertSheriff. Thank you for your work on Please Believe Me (song). Another editor, Aesurias, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Great article! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aesurias}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Aesurias (talk) 08:05, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: I'm Me Again has been accepted

[edit]
I'm Me Again, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Meena16:44, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jack Jones discography has been accepted

[edit]
Jack Jones discography, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Didier Landner (talk) 04:41, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]