User talk:Fixedealo

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

Hello, Fixedealo, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 09:45, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: International Pediatric Endosurgery Group (June 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lijil was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The sources are all either to the company's own website or to scholarly articles that aren't really about the company. There is no evidence that the company is notable.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Lijil (talk) 21:05, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Fixedealo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Lijil (talk) 21:05, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I am not new to this but I tried to be as unbiased as possible and adding as many references as I can. So, is it the tone of voice in the article? Or the information itself? Fixedealo (talk) 07:29, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: International Pediatric Endosurgery Group (June 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoldRomean was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Only major change since previous decline was removal of one source.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
GoldRomean (talk) 03:02, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: International Pediatric Endosurgery Group (June 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bunnypranav was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Many sources are cited, but they do not show significant coverage of the subject, and are not independant and reliable sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 07:19, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: International Pediatric Endosurgery Group (June 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bunnypranav was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
No sources added since last decline, still not notable.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 07:41, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: International Pediatric Endosurgery Group (June 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Just a single source shows existence not notabilty: Requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to show notability
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 09:45, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

[edit]
Information icon

Hello Fixedealo. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Fixedealo. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Fixedealo|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:43, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have no financial ties or have or will ever receive payments or compensations for my Wikipedia contributions. Fixedealo (talk) 08:08, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Do you work for, or with, this International Pediatric Endosurgery Group? Or have some other real-life relationship with it? I'm asking because all your edits relate to it, and there's presumably a reason for that. Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:46, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am a surgeon and Ofcourse use an alias for contributing and editing. And again in full disclosure , I do not receive any incentives or compensation for what I do here Fixedealo (talk) 10:37, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, but that did not answer my question. I'm not questioning your alias, or what you do for a living. I'm querying your relationship with the International Pediatric Endosurgery Group. Please outline that, clearly and unambiguously. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:05, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I am a member of the society, among other societies and as an academic, it is on par regarding notability as much as the other associations. Fixedealo (talk) 11:45, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: International Pediatric Endosurgery Group (June 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CSMention269 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Once rejected cannot be resubmitted.
☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(😐 ● 🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 03:52, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]