User talk:DrefromItaly

Welcome!

Hello, DrefromItaly, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Dario Moccia, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! REAL_MOUSE_IRL talk 10:22, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dario Moccia

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dario Moccia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. REAL_MOUSE_IRL talk 10:22, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nu Genea has been accepted

Nu Genea, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

House Blaster (talk • he/they) 22:07, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Torre Pali moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Torre Pali. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:12, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I don't know why I made a draft in the first place: the article is obviously a work in progress! DrefromItaly (talk) 20:14, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Made a mistake: "why I didnt make a draft". DrefromItaly (talk) 20:15, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! Please submit for review once it's ready. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:17, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lepreno moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Lepreno. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 10:29, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will add sources and more information later during the day. DrefromItaly (talk) 10:30, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikishovel As I said, finished translating and adapting text from the Italian version of it and adding information I found myself to the Lepreno article. Sources are there too. Thank you for moving it to draft and making Wikipedia tidier (not sarcastic or ironic, I mean it)! DrefromItaly (talk) 16:43, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Torre Pali

Hello, DrefromItaly. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Torre Pali, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:07, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lepreno has been accepted

Lepreno, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

monkey_smashing^keyboards (talk) 03:59, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Torre Pali

Hello, DrefromItaly. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Torre Pali".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 20:26, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quaglia Sovversiva moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Quaglia Sovversiva. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and require WP:RS, WP:IS. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. QEnigma 论 13:38, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @QEnigma!

I don't mean to be rude, and if I sound rude with this message I'm very sorry in advance. It is not my intention, believe me.

I really don't understand this choice, though, and I would like to discuss it: Quaglia Sovversiva came out today. There is literally no more information that I can put here. Or sources. I have the page in my watchlist: when interviews or anything will come out, I will add everything I can to the article. I think that it should be moved back to the mainspace. The Italian Wikipedia administrators, for example, have not touched the Italian version of the article, which came out if I remember correctly 2 hours before mine.

Cordially,

Dre. DrefromItaly (talk) 13:49, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DrefromItaly, Every article in the Wikipedia mainspace must contain reliable and independent sources to ensure verifiability. If such sources do not exist, the article cannot be maintained and is therefore moved to draft. Wikipedia does not permit original research. You have not provided any acceptable sources. Once suitable material is available and not merely trivial mentions, please feel free to add it to the article and submit it for review. Kindly refer to WP:YFA and WP:BETTER for guidance on drafting an article and to WP:REFB for instructions on formatting references correctly. Regards. QEnigma 论 14:05, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@QEnigma,

Very well. I'll add them as soon as possible. Sorry to have wasted your time. Again, I hope my message didn't sound condescending or in general rude in any way whatsoever.

Regards! DrefromItaly (talk) 14:09, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]