User talk:Allanhojr.wiki

Welcome!

Hello, Allanhojr.wiki!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Migfab008 (talk) 09:19, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Migfab008,

Thanks for the warm welcome! I appreciate the helpful links and the encouragement. I'm currently working on a draft biography article and learning as I go. Looking forward to contributing more and learning from the community.

Cheers.

Allanhojr.wiki (talk) 03:39, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Drafting article for Richard Jonathan Ker

Hi, I'm a new contributor. I'm working on a draft article about Richard Ker and welcome any feedback or suggestions. Thanks! Allanhojr.wiki (talk) 07:44, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard Jonathan Ker (June 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bunnypranav were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Richard Jonathan Ker and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 12:02, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for reviewing this draft.

This updated submission for Richard Ker now includes reliable, independent, secondary sources with significant coverage of the subject. Sources include MalaysiaNow, Vulcan Post, Daily CMO, BFM89.9, and Astro Awani—each providing in-depth articles or interviews focused on Richard Ker's career, media work, and heritage advocacy.

The tone and formatting have also been revised for neutrality and alignment with Wikipedia’s encyclopedic standards. I’ve removed promotional language and ensured all content is backed by verifiable sources.

I kindly ask for your reconsideration. If further adjustments are needed, I’m happy to make them.

Thank you for your time and guidance.

Let me know if you want to make this sound even tighter or more formal. Otherwise, submit as is.

Allanhojr.wiki (talk) 14:09, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly see the below comment ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 14:20, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Allanhojr.wiki! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 12:02, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard Jonathan Ker (June 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bunnypranav was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources are not independant and reliable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Richard Jonathan Ker and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 14:19, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the previous feedback. I've made the necessary improvements by adding multiple independent and reliable sources to support key statements in the article. These include coverage of Richard Ker’s TEDx talks and public speaking engagements, as well as his involvement in the Melalap heritage initiative, all backed by credible media outlets and event platforms.

I believe the article now meets the notability and sourcing requirements. Kindly consider it for review again. I appreciate your time and guidance.

Allanhojr.wiki (talk) 03:24, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard Jonathan Ker (June 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:

For the same reason as Bunnypranav.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Richard Jonathan Ker and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 05:09, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback.

I’ve updated the draft with stronger, independent sources like The Star, Daily Express, MalaysiaNow, and Vulcan Post. These cover Richard Ker’s work, public talks, and heritage projects in a non-promotional way.

I’ve also cleaned up the tone to stay neutral and within Wikipedia’s guidelines. I believe the article now meets notability and sourcing standards. Appreciate your time reviewing it again.

Allanhojr.wiki (talk) 09:36, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve also removed unnecessary and non-independent sources. The draft now focuses only on reliable and relevant citations. Kindly review again. Thank you!

Allanhojr.wiki (talk) 09:53, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]