User talk:45.49.236.6

April 2025

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Braddock Road (Braddock expedition). When removing a maintenance template, please either ensure that the problem that the template refers to has been resolved, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as this change has been reverted. Take a look at getting started to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 16:47, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Crips–Bloods gang war, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ... discospinster _talk 22:33, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Crips–Bloods gang war, you may be blocked from editing. ... discospinster _talk 22:38, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm PEPSI697. I noticed that you recently removed content from Minuteman Civil Defense Corps without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. PEPSI697 💬 | 📝 07:05, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Watchmen characters. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 12:58, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2025

Hello, I'm Patrick Welsh. I noticed that you recently removed content from Recess appointment without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Patrick (talk) 20:44, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at The Bulwark (website), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. ~Darth Stabro^{Talk • Contribs} 11:19, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Remsense ‥ 论 05:02, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(A known LTA profile, FYI @Patrick Welsh, @Discospinster, @PEPSI697, @Fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four, @Darth Stabro.) Remsense ‥ 论 05:02, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Remsense ‥ 论 00:46, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Carisoprodol, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 23:51, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at John M. Barry, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 02:55, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ronald D. Johnson. Muffin(Spreading democracy, one edit at a time) 00:19, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month to prevent further vandalism.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:50, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to TX Group. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 06:32, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is the "serial comma" LTA, see here for the most recent ANI discussion. They're persistent and non-responsive to attempts to communicate. ​ fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 06:35, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to United States Army Aviation Center of Excellence, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 07:55, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Template:Americans. Materialscientist (talk) 09:22, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Hello, I'm Janan2025. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ernest Renan without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Janan2025 (talk) 06:13, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at David McKitterick, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Perception312 (talk) 12:38, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ... discospinster _talk 19:13, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TEDickey (talk) 00:27, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 05:15, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Hello, I'm ChildrenWillListen. I noticed that you recently removed content from Targeting of political opponents and civil society under the second Trump administration without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 04:47, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Detention and deportation of American citizens in the second Trump administration, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 04:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Detention and deportation of American citizens in the second Trump administration, you may be blocked from editing. ConnerTT (talk) 04:53, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  PhilKnight (talk) 05:01, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

unblock|reason=Your reason here 45.49.236.6 (talk) 09:59, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

End block I am reming based and false text! 45.49.236.6 (talk) 09:59, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

False block I am reming false information partisan information.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

45.49.236.6 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Your reason here 45.49.236.6 (talk) 10:00, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you:
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:02, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ONE open unblock request at a time, please. You abusively had three. WP:GAB explains how to contest your block. You need to convince us you understand your edits were inappropriate and if unblocked, your future edits would be significantly different. Anything else is just wasting our time. --Yamla (talk) 10:04, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's partisan information.

Not true! Unlock me please I am removing sensitive information.  45.49.236.6 (talk) 15:10, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]