Template talk:US numbered highways
![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | On 24 August 2025, it was proposed that this page be moved. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
Requested move 24 August 2025
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Support was weak and especially conditional, and no one made a strong case that renaming would benefit readers. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:03, 22 September 2025 (UTC)
Template:US numbered highways → ? – The current title is associated with the United States Numbered Highway System, and needs to be moved somewhere else to avoid confusion with Template:U.S. Routes. Template:US numbered highways should just redirect to Template:U.S. Routes. 2600:1700:6180:6290:C238:E68F:CC3D:7F06 (talk) 16:48, 24 August 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 19:13, 31 August 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPathtalk 05:38, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
- Probably Template:United States highways. Gonnym (talk) 09:57, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- If anything, Template:Numbered highways in the United States, but honestly, I don't need the need to change this as proposed unless someone is also going to bother editing dozens of articles just to change a piece of coding that readers won't see. There's no visible benefit here. Count me as generally opposed to a change. Imzadi 1979 → 17:16, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject U.S. Roads has been notified of this discussion. TarnishedPathtalk 05:38, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support for Template:Numbered highways in the United States, if the nom really intends upon retargeting the resulting redirect and fixing all of the transclusions. Otherwise, since this is not reader-facing, so long as editors know the difference between these two templates, I agree with Imzadi that there is no tangible benefit for what would be a large amount of tedious effort. That time is probably better spent elsewhere. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:59, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.