Talk:Wikipedia and the Israeli–Palestinian conflict
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wikipedia and the Israeli–Palestinian conflict article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months ![]() |
![]() | You are an administrator, so you may disregard the message below You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If admin}}
You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page: .ECR-edit-request-warning {
display: none;
}
Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is subject to the extended-confirmed restriction. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.) |
![]() | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a contentious topic.The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
![]() | The content of Wikipedia and the 2023 Israel-Palestine war was merged into Wikipedia and the Israeli–Palestinian conflict on December 29, 2023. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:
|
Index
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be auto-archived by ClueBot III if there are more than 5. |
Map lead image
[edit]

Should this map does not belong to the lead section, it does not given context but focusing on Wikipedia-related article. Absolutiva (talk) 22:01, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- It's the same as the one at Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Making a WP:OTHERCONTENT comparison, Wikipedia Seigenthaler biography incident has the same "solution." More articles at Category:Wikipedia content. IMO it works, it depicts the disputed area and I think it's better than no WP:LEADIMAGE. When you removed it, you said "Map undue weight, WP:SYNTH", that doesn't make sense to me.
- We can of course discuss alternatives, like the Palestinian WP-globe, or a screenshot of Template:Contentious topics/Arab-Israeli talk notice, but IMO either of those wouldn't be improvement. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 04:52, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Unless you've got alternatives, I prefer the status quo 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 05:37, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
A talk page notice that notify editors related to Arab-Israeli conflict page, that is designated as contentious topic. - I preferred this screenshot of Template:Contentious topics/Arab-Israeli talk notice instead. Absolutiva (talk) 06:26, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- I dont think that we should be bragging about restricting editing in our free encycolopedia, although that screenshot could work somewhere else in the article 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 06:28, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- I've actually seen more than one WP-journalist make a comment like "How can WP possibly work at all? Blocks and restrictions are a big part of it. They force people to discuss and try to reach a consensus." Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 06:35, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- I dont think that we should be bragging about restricting editing in our free encycolopedia, although that screenshot could work somewhere else in the article 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 06:28, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
ScheerPost
[edit]ScheerPost commented, "For all the right-wing media agita about Wikipedia's alleged pro-Palestinian bias, there is of plenty evidence that Zionists have for years been trying to push the site into a more pro-Israel direction."
seems undue, considering the relative significance of the source. I will removed it, unless someone objects. FortunateSons (talk) 10:30, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
- go for it. seems like a blog not really useful Bluethricecreamman (talk) 15:02, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
- Done, thanks! FortunateSons (talk) 15:21, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
Excerpt template
[edit]@Isi96, other editors, I'm not sure this [1] is a good idea. Nothing says the text should be the same in both articles, they have different focus, and it makes editing the section and using the refs strange. Personally, this is only the second time I've seen this used, and the first time I found it hard to understand what was going on. Also, this means that whenever the other article changes that section, this one changes too. I'm reverting. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 04:20, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
- I used the excerpt template because much of the same text was present in both sections. Isi96 (talk) 04:29, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
- Much, but the excerpt is more than twice as long, that seems to much WP:PROPORTION for this article. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 04:34, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
- Fair enough. Isi96 (talk) 04:35, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks. I can imagine this method can have its uses, but this is a touchy area. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 04:43, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
- Fair enough. Isi96 (talk) 04:35, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
- Much, but the excerpt is more than twice as long, that seems to much WP:PROPORTION for this article. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 04:34, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
Please fix these errors
[edit]I can't edit the page, so please fix these errors:
- Typo: "The campaign suggested that pan ro-Israeli editors"
- This is not correct English: "Historian Shira Klein, comparing coverage of the Gaza war on English and Hebrew Wikipedia in 2024, said that "where the distortions lie, are in the Hebrew Wikipedia." Shira Klein was speaking live and of course the phrases are not always useful as quotable lines. I'd suggest to change this to the following: "Historian Shira Klein, comparing coverage of the Gaza war on English and Hebrew Wikipedia in 2024, said that the distortions lie in the Hebrew Wikipedia, and that there is "a bit of a war between Right and Left on Hebrew Wikipedia."
Hurluberlue (talk) 08:43, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Hurluberlue Thanks for noticing the typo, I implemented your other suggestion as well (and I checked the source, she did say that). Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:11, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for the correction and the changes. Yes of course, she did say that in the live lecture, but it's hard to understand when it is put in writing exactly as it was spoken. That's why I suggested the change. Hurluberlue (talk) 09:30, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Hurluberlue I only meant that I confirmed your addition, "a bit of a war between Right and Left on Hebrew Wikipedia." I knew the rest was there, since I added it in the first place ;-) Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:36, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
- Btw, she talks more of WP and the IP-conflict in this [2] document, but I don't know Hebrew and or if the publisher is WP:RS. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:39, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for the correction and the changes. Yes of course, she did say that in the live lecture, but it's hard to understand when it is put in writing exactly as it was spoken. That's why I suggested the change. Hurluberlue (talk) 09:30, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
ref
[edit]Not sure if anything here is helpful for this article:
--Another Believer (Talk) 18:34, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
- cool article. might be worth posting somewhere more central, it seems to touch multiple aspects of wikipedia. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 18:56, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
- "Consensus was reached. The lines were added back. Approximately 7,000 words of deliberation to settle, for a time, three sentences. This was Wikipedia’s process working as intended." Do we love this place despite that or because of it? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 19:20, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
- porque no los dos? Bluethricecreamman (talk) 19:29, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
- Indeed. Ok, I read that article. I recommend it, it was worth it. And the ending was just brilliant. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 20:14, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
- I've shared the link at The Signpost's suggestions page and I think Template:Press may need to be added to several article Talk pages. ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:18, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
- Yeah, I had to revert myself when I saw @Newslinger had already been there. Feel free to add on more pages. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 21:01, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
- I've shared the link at The Signpost's suggestions page and I think Template:Press may need to be added to several article Talk pages. ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:18, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
- Indeed. Ok, I read that article. I recommend it, it was worth it. And the ending was just brilliant. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 20:14, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
- porque no los dos? Bluethricecreamman (talk) 19:29, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
- "Consensus was reached. The lines were added back. Approximately 7,000 words of deliberation to settle, for a time, three sentences. This was Wikipedia’s process working as intended." Do we love this place despite that or because of it? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 19:20, 4 September 2025 (UTC)