Talk:Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting

Adam Lanza's own page.

[edit]

I feel like Adam should get his own page on Wikipedia, there are quite a lot of details about his life that would definitely be given more Justice if he was given his own page, because then you would be able to go into more detail about it without the page for the shooting getting too long.


At the very least I do feel like somebody should at least add Adam's photograph. Caratrox (talk) 23:18, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See A9 of the FAQ. My memory might be faulty but it is my understanding that there are no fair-use images of Lanza. - Shearonink (talk) 23:46, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've seen plenty of images of Adam that have been used in various articles and videos centered around the shooting, the DMV took Adams drivers image, but that image was used by Adam in the context of his purpose, that image has been used in various places, and the article on the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting would fall under fair use because this is a non-profit organization that would be using the image for educational uses only, not to mention you also have Elliot Rodgers drivers image on his page. Caratrox (talk) 00:24, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I tried to do a search in this article's talk page archives about a photo of Lanza and was unsuccessful but I am fairly certain that at one time there was a photo of Lanza in this article but it was rejected or deleted because its provenance/copyright status/etc couldn't be proven. Oh, and re: Elliott Rodgers"? See the essay WP:OTHERCONTENT. Wikipedia content is created by consensus. If a photo of Lanza isn't already here in this article, consensus would seem to be against including it for one reason or another. Wikipedia is very careful about images and their copyright status, the internet in general is not. But anyway, have at it, make a formal proposal if you wish, etc. Shearonink (talk) 01:54, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry about this. I am new to Wikipedia, I mostly use fandom, which doesn't have nearly as many restrictions on what you can upload 😅 Caratrox (talk) 01:56, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There is no photo of Adam Lanza in the article because there are very few and they are not free to use; see also this thread. The longstanding consensus is that Lanza does not need a separate article, and Draft:Adam Lanza has never gone live in mainspace because it is a train wreck.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 08:18, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep in mind that Lanza fits WP:BIO1E - was not notable for anything else but the involvement here. There's very little else that can be said about him outside of the context of the shooting, so it does not make sense for a separate article. Masem (t) 13:23, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
but what about the whole image thing, there are two images of Adam that are of his driver's ID photo, and his school ID photo, from what I've seen of Salvador Ramos and Elliot Rodger on this wiki, their ID photos seem to be fair game, why not Adam Lanza? Those were the main two images used in the news outlets.
If you aren't aware of what images I'm talking about, I'll describe them here.
Adam School ID: he has a stupid bowl cut, extremely wide eyes and a very skeletal frame, this one is pretty low quality, not in how it's taken but just the quality in general.
Adam driver ID: his hair is a bit more curled in this, and he has a less wide-eyed expression, still looks like a crackhead though. Caratrox (talk) 13:31, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm curious about what Wikipedia's notability guidelines in relation to mass shooters are because it seems fairly arbitrary whether or not they receive an article separate from the article about their crimes. It seems to be that the perpetrators of the deadliest shootings up to that point receive their own articles, but then again, the perpetrators of the San Ysidro McDonald's massacre and the Luby's massacre do not have their own articles, despite both committing the deadliest mass shootings in U.S. history up to that point. In addition to this, several shooters whose attacks were not the deadliest up to that point have their own articles. Perhaps I am understanding/overestimating how much media certain shooters received, but it seems as if the policy regarding this is rather inconsistent. Thank you for reading. NesserWiki (talk) 12:38, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Defamation lawsuit money is actually much higher

[edit]

The source (from 2024) listed in this article lists the payout to be $965 million, but this article[2] from NPR (published in 2025) lists the money to be at $1.3 billion. As such, the corresponding information in this article should be updated. QuisEstJoe (talk) 16:36, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing! I've changed that. Thanks for the new info.
⚠︎ ArkadenBoden ⚠︎ (talk) 12:32, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]