Talk:Lannion–Côte de Granit Airport

The content of Lannion Airfield was merged into Lannion–Côte de Granit Airport on 11 August 2025. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

France Low‑importance France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Aviation: Airports Aviation portal This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions. This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: | b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> | b2<!--Coverage and accuracy   --> = <yes/no> | b3<!--Structure               --> = <yes/no> | b4<!--Grammar and style       --> = <yes/no> | b5<!--Supporting materials    --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion. This article is supported by the airport project. Military history: Aviation / European / German / World War II Start‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions. Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military aviation task force European military history task force German military history task force World War II task force

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lannion – Côte de Granit Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071011120026/http://www.aeroport.fr/les-aeroports-de-l-uaf/lannion-cote-de-granit.php to http://www.aeroport.fr/les-aeroports-de-l-uaf/lannion-cote-de-granit.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:38, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Lannion Airfield

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To merge Lannion Airfield into Lannion–Côte de Granit Airport for short text, context, overlap and not WP:TOOBIG; independent notability of Luftwaffe use has not been contested; a finely decision if we votes were counted; key arguments include @WP:PAGEDECIDE. Makes more sense to have the information in one place" and "very little information takes up a lot of space on both pages". Klbrain (talk) 09:43, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

Lannion Airfield should be merged into this article as its History section. Same airfield/airport. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 20:10, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support per nom. Also I have notified WP:WikiProject Airports. ASUKITE 21:23, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Disagree This will make the article on the modern airport far too heavily focused on deep details from World War 2, with almost no info post-1945. Pmbma (talk) 21:50, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Not a reason not to merge, but a reason to add post-1945 info! -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:09, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support per nom. Not worthy to have two separate article on the same airport, the current airport article is tiny; less than 3,000 bytes, ripe for expansion. Gavbadger (talk) 17:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support these are the same airport, a lack of info on the modern airport is not a reason not to merge. SportingFlyer T·C 17:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Disagree Added 5,300 bytes of post-war history on the modern airport. Specific Luftwaffe history should stay here. Bollardant (talk) 01:12, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Disagree This article is very detailed on the Luftwaffe usage, and should stay as a seperate article. There is also history on the other page.KeyMen12 (talk) 08:19, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support per nom, neither article is particularly long or unwieldy, and the merged article shouldn't be either; the resultant History section won't be any longer than that of Dallas Fort Worth International Airport (citing a page I've edited frequently). I strongly concur with SportingFlyer that the relative lack of postwar history is no reason not to merge. Carguychris (talk) 13:49, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support; on first glance the articles seem like they can stand on their own, but after actually reading the content it seems that very little information takes up a lot of space on both pages. Thus, they should be merged, and work should be done to keep everything looking nice. JuxtaposedJacob (talk) | :) | he/him | 23:41, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• The airfield article has now been merged into this article since their was a consensus of 5 votes to 3 to merge. Gavbadger (talk) 12:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  You should have waited for this to be formally closed. SportingFlyer T·C 12:19, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • It's been 4 months since proposed, notices were posted on the relevant WikiProjects. As per WP:MERGE - "Any user, including the user who first proposed the merge, may close the discussion and move forward with the merge if enough time (normally one week or more) has elapsed and there has been no discussion or if there is unanimous consent to merge. ". 2 out of the 3 editors to disagree are part of the original creators editing group. Gavbadger (talk) 12:25, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    • With the last vote on 9 March 2025, you can assume that the discussion is still active. The Banner talk 15:00, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Disagree Creates an unbalanced article. The Banner talk 15:00, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Support per WP:PAGEDECIDE. Makes more sense to have the information in one place. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 06:28, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

  Y Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 09:43, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]