User talk:KeyMen12

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

Hello, KeyMen12, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 14:17, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aérodrome communal de Rodez-Onet-le-Château (October 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 14:17, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, KeyMen12! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 14:17, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Serre-Chevalier airfield

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Serre-Chevalier airfield requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. OXYLYPSE (talk) 14:36, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aérodrome communal de Rodez-Onet-le-Château (October 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Memer15151 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Two sources are not enough to establish notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
UserMemer (chat) Tribs 13:04, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Serre-Chevalier Airfield moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Serre-Chevalier Airfield. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 23:54, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tarun Kumar Aich (October 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by User4edits was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Tarun Kumar Aich instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 09:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of RAF Kunming

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on RAF Kunming requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/blog/the-raf-and-china-a-forgotten-alliance-part-2/ and https://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/blog/the-raf-and-china-a-forgotten-alliance-part-3/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The4lines |||| (Talk) (Contributions) 16:04, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Draft:Chernobyl Mi-8 Helicopter Crash has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Diannaa (talk) 14:20, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Puerto de la Cruz Airfield. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments belong on the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and may respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Muffin(Spreading Democracy, one edit at a time) 15:51, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Puerto de la Cruz Airfield. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Muffin(Spreading Democracy, one edit at a time) 15:56, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Serre-Chevalier Airfield, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sports Park. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Valdahon Airfield

[edit]

A decent start, but you're really going to need more than one Forgotten Airfields link. I seriously doubt it would get approved without more sources. Sandcat555 (talk) 07:30, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Winter Airfield has been accepted

[edit]
Winter Airfield, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Kaizenify (talk) 14:52, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Information icon Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Winter Airfield. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:42, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi KeyMen12. Thank you for your work on Battle of Vilnius (1812). Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for writing the article! Have a blessed and wonderful days ahead!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:35, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bad Zwischenahn Airfield has been accepted

[edit]
Bad Zwischenahn Airfield, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

qcne (talk) 12:20, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Zwischenahn Airfield

[edit]

Hello,

Within the infobox for Bad Zwischenahn Airfield, you state "Former German Military airfield (Large)", but nowhere in the article does it state that the airfield was "large", can you please add this to the article proper with a reference. Gavbadger (talk) 15:08, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Further Edit - you have done this for Waldau Airfield aswell. The statement needs a reference. Gavbadger (talk) 15:15, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the mistake, what I meant was the size of the airfield, I'll change it KeyMen12 (talk) 15:28, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kalix Airfield (December 20)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MWFwiki was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:

1. So, the museum source is good. The "visitkalix.se" site is skirting primary source material, but I'll let it slide. However, my concern is primarily with "forgottenairfields.com." My major issue is that, on several pages, their "source" is... Wikipedia. We're getting into definite WP:CIRCULAR territory, if not Woozle effect territory, with that one. I would suggest finding sources other than this. If you are absolutely, 100% sure that there are no other sources that cite the same information, I would consider accepting it under the auspices of WP:NOTLEVEL.

2.I am concerned this article does not meet WP:GNG standards. Can you present to me an argument as to why you believe it does? Feel free to respond on your talk page, or mine.

3. I am not sure this airfield has had "widespread coverage."

3. The language could use some polishing-up, but I would be willing to assist with that if you can find additional sources. I would like to accept this article, as it is interesting and well-written, but I just cannot justify it at this time. I am not 'rejecting' this, it is only being 'declined,' so that you may resolve the aforementioned issues -- if-possible -- and re-submit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
MWFwiki (talk) 02:16, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aérodrome communal de Rodez-Onet-le-Château (December 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommunityNotesContributor was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Based on the additional sources added since the last AfC submission; one is a quasi-primary passing mention, and the other is indexing in yellow pages. Unfortunately, neither help to establish significant coverage.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
CNC (talk) 14:12, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi KeyMen12. Thank you for your work on Bad Zwischenahn Airfield. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:30, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Valdahon Airfield (January 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MWFwiki were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:

1. As I stated on Draft:Kalix Airfield, I have concerns with the sourcing, primarily with "forgottenairfields.com." My major issue is that, on several pages, their "source" is... Wikipedia. We're getting into definite WP:CIRCULAR territory, if not Woozle effect territory, with that one. I would suggest finding sources other than this. If you are absolutely, 100% sure that there are no other sources that cite the same information, I would consider accepting it under the auspices of WP:NOTLEVEL. That said, the only source that appears to meet WP:RS is this.

2. As I stated on Draft:Kalix Airfield, I am concerned this article does not meet WP:GNG standards. Can you present to me an argument as to why you believe it does? Feel free to respond on your talk page, or mine.

3. I am not sure this airfield has had "widespread coverage."

3. The overall prose is a tad essay-like. I am not 'rejecting' this, it is only being 'declined,' so that you may resolve the aforementioned issues -- if-possible -- and re-submit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
MWFwiki (talk) 23:27, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of Vilnius (1812)

[edit]

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Battle of Vilnius (1812), is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Excommunicato (talk) 14:51, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Battle of Vilnius (1812) for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Vilnius (1812) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Vilnius (1812) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Excommunicato (talk) 19:52, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Vilnius (1812)

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Jeschaton. An article that you recently made, Battle of Vilnius (1812), seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or another application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. In particular, you should check each citation, and fictitious references must be removed. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. jeschaton (immanentize) 20:14, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Serre-Chevalier Airfield for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Serre-Chevalier Airfield is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serre-Chevalier Airfield until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 20:41, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Winter Airfield for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Winter Airfield is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winter Airfield until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:14, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of Vilnius (1812)

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Battle of Vilnius (1812), a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Vitaium (talk) 08:31, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

hello

[edit]
Hello, KeyMen12. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

@KeyMen12 Thank you for your time! Have a great week! Phoebezz22 (talk) 14:44, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Puerto de la Cruz Airfield

[edit]

Hello, KeyMen12,

Thank you for creating Puerto de la Cruz Airfield.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

KeyMen12, it appears that you have used output from an LLM (Large Language Model) AI in the creation of this article. Please do not do this, as LLMs hallucinate "facts". For example the Puerto de la Cruz airfield was not laid out until 1963, which makes the claims of WWII activities clearly false. Editors are responsible for their edits - even the AI assisted ones - and repeatedly adding false information to en-wiki, as you have done here and elsewhere, may result in you being topic banned or blocked if you continue.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Hydronium Hydroxide}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 11:28, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Puerto de la Cruz Airfield

[edit]

Hello, KeyMen12

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Hydronium Hydroxide, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Puerto de la Cruz Airfield, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

  1. Edit the page
  2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hydronium Hydroxide}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 12:03, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Gustav-Oskar Winter Klingele has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gustav-Oskar Winter Klingele. Thanks! Kovcszaln6 (talk) 10:19, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Naval Outlying Landing Field Cuddihy (February 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kovcszaln6 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Kovcszaln6 (talk) 09:56, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gustav-Oskar Winter Klingele (February 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 11:24, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi KeyMen12. Thank you for your work on Chernobyl Mi-8 helicopter crash. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for builing this page in response to some initial copyright issues. Overall, I thought that the event was noteworthy, although there was too much background that is better just linked to the central discussions. Remember sentence case for titles and headings; and adding categories helps readers to find the content.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 13:51, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kalix Airfield

[edit]

Information icon Hello, KeyMen12. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kalix Airfield, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:08, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Aérodrome communal de Rodez-Onet-le-Château

[edit]

Information icon Hello, KeyMen12. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aérodrome communal de Rodez-Onet-le-Château, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:07, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The World Destubathon

[edit]

Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It started today on Monday June 16 and will run until Sunday July 13. There is over $3300 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for subjects which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested. Even if you can only manage a few articles they would be very much appreciated and help make the content produced as diverse and broad as possible!♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:03, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kalix Airfield

[edit]

Hello, KeyMen12. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Kalix Airfield".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:21, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Valdahon Airfield

[edit]

Hello, KeyMen12. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Valdahon Airfield".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 00:26, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Naval Outlying Landing Field Cuddihy

[edit]

Information icon Hello, KeyMen12. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Naval Outlying Landing Field Cuddihy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:08, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Naval Outlying Landing Field Cuddihy

[edit]

Hello, KeyMen12. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Naval Outlying Landing Field Cuddihy".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 10:25, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Middle Guard (Napoleonic), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blücher.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:20, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Draft:Sollas Airfield has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. The4lines |||| (talk) 17:03, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 57th Infantry Regiment (France), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bourbon and Tarn.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]