Talk:1990 United States Senate election in Tennessee

1990 United States Senate election in Tennessee has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 25, 2025. (Reviewed version).

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Congress Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) event(s).

Presidents of the United States Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Presidents of the United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Presidents of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Presidents of the United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject Presidents of the United StatesTemplate:WikiProject Presidents of the United StatesPresidents of the United States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Tennessee Low‑importance

	Tennessee portal 1990 United States Senate election in Tennessee is within the scope of WikiProject Tennessee, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Tennessee and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member. [Project Articles] • [Project Page] • [Project Talk] • [Assessment] • [Template Usage]TennesseeWikipedia:WikiProject TennesseeTemplate:WikiProject TennesseeTennessee
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from 1990 United States Senate election in Tennessee appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 May 2025 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that one candidate in the 1990 United States Senate election in Tennessee began the campaign with $3,000 in campaign funds, while the other began with $1 million?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2025/May. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1990 United States Senate election in Tennessee.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Plifal talk 09:40, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that after winning the 1990 Senate election Al Gore became the final Democratic Senator from Tennessee?

Source: https://nashvillebanner.com/2024/11/05/marsha-blackburn-re-elected-senate-seat/

ALT1: ... that a candidate in the 1990 United States Senate election in Tennessee ran even though he knew he would probably lose? Source: https://www.newspapers.com/image/1003716686/
ALT2: ~~... that one of the main candidates in the 1990 United States Senate election in Tennessee had $3,000 in campaign funds, while the other had $1 million?~~
ALT3: ... that the 1990 United States Senate election in Tennessee was boring? Source: https://www.newspapers.com/image/283809298/
Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Through the Valley (The Last of Us)

5x expanded by OlifanofmrTennant (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 25 past nominations.

Olliefant (she/her) 20:41, 21 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

@Bremps: I have striked one of the hooks you added as it isn't true. Hawkins spent 3,000 in the primary while Gore began the general with one million as he didn't have a primary challenger. Olliefant (she/her) 18:02, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook eligibility:

Cited:
Interesting: - See below

QPQ: Done.

Overall: @OlifanofmrTennant: very nice 5x expansion! The article is sufficiently longer, well-cited, and neutral, leaving my only issues relating to the hooks themselves. The non-striked hooks are all cited (as a courtesy I added a citation for ALT3), but aren't necessarily interesting. I can't see ALT0 mattering to readers outside of the US, ALT1 is true for 90% of non-presidential elections that take place, and ALT3 is kind of the opposite of catchy (who wants to read about a boring election 🙃). If you could revise ALT2 and correct its inaccuracy, or maybe make an ALT4 touching on the fact that 'while the general election wasn't close, Hawkins only won the primary by a narrow margin', those could sound good. If you disagree with my assessment of ALT0, however, I'll pass the DYK for that hook, I just feel like the article has more potential. Thank you again for your contributions, and cheers! Johnson524 08:16, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think if the concern with Alt0 is being to America-centric then the primary thing won’t be work either because AFAIK other countries don’t have primary systems that same issue. I do belive I may be able to reword alt2 into something but I’ll do some digging for more facts. Olliefant (she/her) 16:05, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A reworked ALT2 could be:

ALT2a: ... that one candidate in the 1990 United States Senate election in Tennessee began the campaign with $3,000 in campaign funds, while the other began with $1 million?

Also a possible option could be

ALT4: ... that a candidate in the 1990 United States Senate election in Tennessee labeled his campaign a failure two weeks before the election was held?Source: https://www.newspapers.com/image/594651122/

Apologies if you feel these also don't meet DYKINT it was quite a boring campaign. Olliefant (she/her) 04:00, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Approving ALT0, ALT2a, and ALT4, with a preference towards ALT2a and ALT4. I actually quite like these new hooks! Thank you again for your contributions, and cheers from North Carolina 🙂 Johnson524 05:06, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

Passed. History6042😊 (Contact me) 11:43, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:1990 United States Senate election in Tennessee/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: OlifanofmrTennant (talk · contribs) 22:47, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: History6042 (talk · contribs) 20:25, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will do this one for WP:GARC. History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:25, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@History6042: you may not have seen the notice in my talk page but I will (and have been) away from my computer for a few days so I will not be able to immediately answer your concerns Olliefant (she/her) 19:10, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will start the review tomorrow morning. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Images are all fine. History6042😊 (Contact me) 19:38, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stabliity and scope are fine. History6042😊 (Contact me) 23:01, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stability, neutrality, and scope are good too. History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:57, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will do a spotcheck later today or tommorow. History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:58, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2, 14, 17, and 24 are the citations I'll check. History6042😊 (Contact me) 19:59, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All are good, I will now run Earwig. History6042😊 (Contact me) 18:04, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A 0.0% on Earwig, I have never seen that before, impressive. History6042😊 (Contact me) 18:05, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do a grammar and prose check now. History6042😊 (Contact me) 18:06, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All good enough, pass. History6042😊 (Contact me) 11:41, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.