Draft:Mohit Joshi
| Submission declined on 8 September 2025 by CNMall41 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 3 September 2025 by RangersRus (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by RangersRus 33 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 13 March 2024 by User4edits (talk). Declined by User4edits 18 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 12 March 2024 by S0091 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by S0091 18 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 27 February 2024 by Zoglophie (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Zoglophie 19 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 28 January 2024 by Fade258 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Fade258 20 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 18 October 2023 by Johannes Maximilian (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Johannes Maximilian 23 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 17 October 2023 by Akshithmanya (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Akshithmanya 23 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 31 August 2023 by CNMall41 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by CNMall41 2 years ago. | |
Comment: Still fails notability guidelines. The sources that do talk about him in-depth are NEWSORGINIDA or otherwise unreliable. Nothing has changed since the last AfD and the last decline. CNMall41 (talk) 19:09, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: FYI for previous reviewers, a new editor moved Mohit Joshi to mainspace and is now at AfD. CNMall41 (talk) 20:34, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: The person is not inherently notable for holding such a position. Even after numerous declines requesting more WP:SIGCOV, it seems there is no more SIGCOV beyond what is present here, on the basis of which, at this point, this individual is not notable. To save the time of AfC reviewers, and to help the editor contribute more meaningfully at Wikipedia, I am rejecting this Draft. Thanks, User4edits (talk) 05:56, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Interviews/his comments are primary and not independent so should only be used very sparingly and only for very basic facts that are not self-serving. There was some coverage about him in the March 2023 timeframe which in-part is churnalism but above that need to show sustained in-depth coverage about him (not what he says, press releases, etc.). Also, this is written like a resume rather than an encyclopedia article. S0091 (talk) 18:13, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: With the exception of this article, none of the others demonstrate notability. They are either unreliable sources, fall under WP:NEWSORGINDIA, or are routine announcements. CNMall41 (talk) 05:58, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Mohit Joshi | |
|---|---|
| Born | 1976 (49 years)[1] |
| Citizenship | British[2] |
| Education |
|
| Occupations |
|
Mohit Joshi is a chief executive officer and managing director of the India-based multinational technology services company Tech Mahindra.[4][5] He is an independent non-executive director at Aviva plc and a member of of the Risk & Governance and Nomination committees.[6]
Education
[edit]Joshi completed his bachelor's degree in History from St. Stephen's College, Delhi. He did master of business administration in Faculty of Management Studies from Delhi University.[7] In 2019, he completed Global Leadership and Public Policy for the 21st Century Program at Harvard Kennedy School.[8]
Career
[edit]In 2000, Joshi joined Infosys company as a senior business development manager,[9] and during the several subsequent years he was working on different roles within the company.[10] In 2007, he was appointed as CEO of Infosys Mexico to manage the business within the Latin America region.[11] In 2023, Joshi resigned from Infosys with the position of President after working for 22 years. He was in charge for the financial services business (healthcare and life sciences).[12] It took six months time for complete transition.[13] In 2025, he joined Tech Mahindra company as CEO and Managing Director.[14]
References
[edit]- ^ "Mohit Joshi quits as Infosys president, named CEO of Tech Mahindra". The Times of India. 12 Mar 2023. Archived from the original on 25 August 2023. Retrieved 30 August 2023.
- ^ "Infosys President Mohit Joshi Resigns: 5 Facts About Him". 11 Mar 2023.
- ^ "'The dramatic reprioritisation of AI is our big opportunity,' says Tech Mahindra's new CEO & MD Mohit Joshi". 3 Apr 2024. Archived from the original on 2024-04-03. Retrieved 2025-09-03.
- ^ Suresh, Haripriya (2024-12-19). "India's Tech Mahindra aiming for bigger bite of bank tech spends, CEO says". Reuters. Retrieved 2025-09-03.
- ^ "Davos 2025: US clients are now more optimistic about future, says Tech Mahindra CEO Mohit Joshi". Moneycontrol. Archived from the original on 2025-01-24. Retrieved 2025-09-03.
- ^ "Infosys President Mohit Joshi resigns | Company Business News". mint. 2023-03-11. Archived from the original on 2023-04-14. Retrieved 2025-09-03.
- ^ "'The dramatic reprioritisation of AI is our big opportunity,' says Tech Mahindra's new CEO & MD Mohit Joshi - BusinessToday". Business Today. 2024-04-03. Archived from the original on 2025-07-10. Retrieved 2025-09-03.
- ^ "Who is Mohit Joshi, the new MD & CEO of Tech Mahindra? He earns Rs 9.5 lacs per day; Know about his lifestyle, career, family". The Financial Express. 2023-03-14. Retrieved 2025-09-03.
- ^ Jain, Sanya (30 Jun 2023). "Who is Mohit Joshi, the Infosys veteran named new CEO of Tech Mahindra?". Money Control. Retrieved 25 Sep 2025.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ "Infosys president Mohit Joshi resigns". The Times of India. 2023-03-11. ISSN 0971-8257. Retrieved 2025-09-03.
- ^ "Infosys president Mohit Joshi resigns after long tenure; company confirms development". Times Now. 2023-03-11. Archived from the original on 2023-03-11. Retrieved 2025-09-03.
- ^ "Infosys President Mohit Joshi resigns - BusinessToday". Business Today. 2023-03-11. Archived from the original on 2023-03-15. Retrieved 2025-09-03.
- ^ "mohit joshi: TechM wants to be a 'credible challenger' in key sectors: CEO Mohit Joshi - The Economic Times". m.economictimes.com. Archived from the original on 2024-03-13. Retrieved 2025-09-03.
- ^ "Tech Mahindra names Mohit Joshi as MD, CEO designate". The Hindu. 2023-03-11. ISSN 0971-751X. Archived from the original on 2024-04-03. Retrieved 2025-09-03.