User talk:YuiFujimoto

Welcome!

Hello, YuiFujimoto, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! PEPSI697 💬 | 📝 08:34, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain...

your revert here. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Council_of_Jewish_Women&diff=prev&oldid=1277207503

It does not strike me as appropriate. 2603:7000:2101:AA00:44F9:2D4:FCC9:BE1D (talk) 09:37, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sumimasen, I reverted because you removed maintenance tags. YuiFujimoto (talk) 09:39, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you under the impression that the tag was still appropriate? (It was not). See Wikipedia:WTRMT --2603:7000:2101:AA00:44F9:2D4:FCC9:BE1D (talk) 09:40, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can start the discussion on the article talk page if you believe that the maintenance tags are no longer important. In the meantime, you can try to add some additional reliable references and try to fix the article before removing the maintenance tags. YuiFujimoto (talk) 09:49, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you understand. There was no problem that called for the tag that you inserted. Everything was already cited, or had a tag for what needed to be cited. In that case, it is not appropriate for you to put a tag atop the page. I would suggest that you self-revert. I gather you may be a new editor. But I just cited the rule for you above. Maintenance templates are not meant to be in articles permanently. Any user without a conflict of interest may remove a maintenance template when the issue has been adequately addressed; obviously, that has been done. Under that circumstance it is disruptive to apply the tag atop the page. --2603:7000:2101:AA00:44F9:2D4:FCC9:BE1D (talk) 10:02, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well, let me correct you here that I didn't added those tags I just reverted while patrolling at recent changes and your summary was just c/e without any explanation. You can revert/remove it. Arigato, YuiFujimoto (talk) 10:08, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

By reverting, you added the tag. Which was not appropriate. Just looking at the article, you could see that every sentence had a ref or a tag (other than the lede, per wp:lede). Thank you. --2603:7000:2101:AA00:44F9:2D4:FCC9:BE1D (talk) 10:10, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Happy editing. Arigato, YuiFujimoto (talk) 10:12, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spammers

Thank you for reporting 2409:408d:3d84:75f4:374a:5c7c:bf3c:85e6 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) to ANI. I have added to your report as the same names were being promoted yesterday, which led to a range-block, so the edits were block evasion as well. Thanks again. Arjayay (talk) 13:33, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Arigato @Arjayay San, I reported them because they were trying to add their name and were spamming the RC feed despite multiple warnings. YuiFujimoto (talk) 13:59, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stop Removing Page Content

Stop removing content editing for the page Edward Smith. All current information is correct and factual from the individuals football career. CharlieDennett2003 (talk) 15:14, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Cristina Rodriguez (painter)

Hello YuiFujimoto. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Cristina Rodriguez (painter), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Coverage in Ocala Gazette is a sufficient claim of importance - use WP:AFD. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 15:22, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Chapter IV – Le Je-Ne-Sais-Quoi Et Le Presque Rien

Hello YuiFujimoto, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Chapter IV – Le Je-Ne-Sais-Quoi Et Le Presque Rien, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Contains sufficient content to be a stub. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 15:53, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Arigato, @Whpq San YuiFujimoto (talk) 15:54, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pronoun Usage in Daniel Küblböck Article

I noticed that my recent edit on the Daniel Küblböck article, specifically regarding the pronoun usage, was reverted. I made that change as her page already cites that "Shortly before the disappearance, Küblböck stated he wanted to assume a female identity and began using the name Lana Kaiser". Continuing to use the pronouns "he", "himself", and "him" don't seem to align with the content of the article.

I’d like to understand your perspective and discuss how we can best adhere to Wikipedia's guidelines on gender identity and pronoun usage. My goal is to ensure the article is both accurate and respectful. 136.52.39.61 (talk) 17:31, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what you want to discuss with me when you have vandalized the article and changed all the details. YuiFujimoto (talk) 17:36, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your concern, and I want to clarify that my intention was not to vandalize the article. I updated the pronoun usage because it reflects the subject's pronoun usage stated and cited directly in the article.

I believe this change maintains accuracy and respect for the subject. If there’s any confusion or if you have concerns about the sources or guidelines, I’m more than willing to discuss it.

Per Wikipedia guidelines, "if consensus cannot be reached over which pronouns to use for a subject, rewriting to avoid pronouns altogether may be considered. Writing without using pronouns requires extra time and care to ensure the text reads smoothly and to avoid awkwardness or confusion". If this is the case, I will re-write the article to use no pronouns. 136.52.39.61 (talk) 17:48, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]