User talk:Xwallawallax
| This is Xwallawallax's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Saad Bhamla (November 25)
[edit]
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to
- meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
- or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Saad Bhamla and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Xwallawallax!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! BuySomeApples (talk) 00:13, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
|
- Thanks - I will try. Looking at the notability requirements and other academic profiles, it is clear that Prof. Bhatia qualifies, but I likely need help conveying that. Same comment for the advertisement rejection. 2600:100D:B08F:B69B:9896:4B7:8D5C:6C3E (talk) 01:02, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Saad Bhamla
[edit]
Hello, Xwallawallax. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Saad Bhamla".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:53, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks - it is fine to delete, and I appreciate you taking the lead on that. 2605:A601:556B:4100:780F:1475:611A:D5F7 (talk) 15:08, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Saad Bhamla (December 13)
[edit]This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to
The comment the reviewer left was:
- meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
- or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth
The Forbes source was written by a Forbes contributor, which means it is not considered a reliable source due to a lack of editorial control.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Saad Bhamla and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Saad Bhamla (December 20)
[edit]This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Profiles by organizations the subject works in and works by the subject are not reliable sources
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Saad Bhamla and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.