User talk:Void if removed
Your submission at Articles for creation: Rebecca Wait has been accepted
[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
asilvering (talk) 18:39, 1 November 2023 (UTC)License tagging for File:Cass-review-logo.svg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Cass-review-logo.svg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:30, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
The file File:Screenshot 2024-04-11 at 10.33.03.png has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the file should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Void, I think you could put that up for {{db-author}}. WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:53, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Coatings?
[edit]So, have you switched your obsession from The Topic I Must Not Mention Here to coatings? Seems like it from your recent edits. Any juicy culture wars going on in that field? Any coating coatracks among those articles? *Dan T.* (talk) 17:31, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
- I decided reading about paint drying was more interesting. Void if removed (talk) 17:33, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
Welcome back!
[edit]It’s good to see you editing again. Sweet6970 (talk) 12:06, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks, just can't keep away... :) Void if removed (talk) 10:15, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
Advice on problems with the transgender health care misinformation page
[edit]Hi, I saw and agreed with your comment on the manufactured uncertainty issue at Talk:Transgender health care misinformation. The more I examine that page the more issues I find, often with the article going beyond what the sources say. However, I'm aware that it's a fraught topic and also a page that's already been heavily litigated in the reviews etc. I wanted to ask if you think that it would be a mistake to raise these issues now (while the manufactured uncertainty discussion is ongoing)? Or better just to put it all out there? I've written up in rough some issues I found just by checking the claims attributed to a couple of sources, if you want to see. At this rate, I'm a bit pessimistic that the rest will hold up to scrutiny, but I'm concerned that if I go in and start raising multiple points at once, hackles will rise and lines will be drawn. Samuelshraga (talk) 10:25, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
- My experience of this area is that there is a tangled nest of topics where a local consensus has been arrived that that I, personally, think is overly confident and doesn't really convey the range of clinical opinion. The history and talk pages at ROGD, Gender exploratory therapy, Gender dysphoria in children and Detransition for starters show how I think overly-certain pictures of extremely conflicted evidence have been assembled. However, I am in a small minority in thinking so and so there's little point relitigating - but to me the misinformation page subsequently brought together many of the issues on those pages also, as well as multiple arguments across RS and FRINGE boards.
- Every single one of these is an area of legitimate clinical disagreement, and using a source like SPLC or Wuest & Last or McNamara et al as a basis for framing alternative viewpoints as misinformation on a subject that requires MEDRS should never have been permitted IMO, meaning the page is fatally flawed - yet it has been given GA status and now aiming for a DYK spotlight.
- I'd suggest testing the water with a point or two, see if you get anywhere or if the lines are already drawn too rigidly and it just becomes exhausting and futile. Void if removed (talk) 21:25, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Void if removed. Thank you. Your Friendly Neighborhood Sociologist ⚧ Ⓐ (talk) 20:44, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Arbcom notice
[edit]You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Transgender health care misinformation on Wikipedia and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.
Thanks, Raladic (talk) 00:18, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction
[edit]
The following sanction now applies to you:
You are warned for putting words in other editors' mouths and not responding to what they actually said.
You have been sanctioned for the reasons provided in response to this arbitration enforcement request.
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gender and sexuality#Final decision and, if applicable, the contentious topics procedure. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction using the appeal process. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything above is unclear to you. Seraphimblade Talk to me 18:35, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
Transgender healthcare and people arbitration case opened
[edit]You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Transgender healthcare and people. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Transgender healthcare and people/Evidence. Please add your evidence by August 11, 2025 at 23:59 UTC, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Transgender healthcare and people/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Party Guide/Introduction. For the Arbitration Committee, Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 06:39, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: ABC v Huntercombe (No. 12) Ltd and others has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Gommeh 🎮 15:04, 12 August 2025 (UTC)I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hi Void if removed. Thank you for your work on American Coatings Association. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thanks for this interesting article on a society with a history spanning more than 90 years. Thanks for working in response to the comments of other editors to improve the content.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Klbrain (talk) 16:32, 27 September 2025 (UTC)
Transgender healthcare and people proposed decision posted
[edit]Hi Void if removed, in the open Transgender healthcare and people arbitration case, a remedy or finding of fact has been proposed which relates to you. Please review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For a guide to the proposed decision, see Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Party Guide/Proposed decision. For the Arbitration Committee, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:29, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
An arbitration case Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Transgender healthcare and people has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:
- In any challenge to the closure of a formal discussion within the WP:GENSEX topic area, users who participated in the underlying discussion are limited to at most two comments, not exceeding a combined total of 250 words. (See details.)
- An uninvolved administrator may restrict participation in an arbitration enforcement (WP:AE) noticeboard thread to certain users. (See details.)
- Administrators are reminded that they have broad discretion in moderating AE threads, including removing users' sections, instructing users not to participate, and imposing AE sanctions against those who misuse the noticeboard.
- Raladic, Void if removed, and Sweet6970 are indefinitely banned from Wikipedia.
- Your Friendly Neighborhood Sociologist, Raladic, Void if removed, and Sweet6970 are indefinitely banned from transgender topics, broadly construed.
- Colin and Samuelshraga are indefinitely banned from transgender healthcare, broadly construed, and are admonished for their behavior in the transgender healthcare topic area.
- Springee is indefinitely banned from user-conduct enforcement noticeboards and admonished for their conduct in transgender topics, broadly construed.
- Aaron Liu is reminded to avoid bludgeoning discussions.
- These site bans and topic bans may be appealed twelve months after this announcement, and every twelve months thereafter.
For the Arbitration Committee, Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 02:58, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Transgender healthcare and people closed
Your submission at Articles for creation: London United Busways v De Marchi has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
SnowyRiver28 (talk) 11:45, 2 November 2025 (UTC)