User talk:Vida0007

This is the user talk page for Vida0007, also known as Jas. If you wish to go to the archive of this talk page, go here.

Salamin Salamin article

Can you also create salamin salamin by Bini since they are number 4 on billboard charts and second viral song after Pantropiko? 122.54.102.0 (talk) 10:51, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will try, but if I were you I would also ask the one who expanded the article: Freedom_Wall. I could create it as a redirect for now, though. Vida0007 (talk) 11:51, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, a redirect is good for now. Will see how much it can be expanded on later. Thanks. Freedom Wall (talk) 07:19, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. Thank you for the reply :) Vida0007 (talk) 15:25, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A fellow fan

Just looked at your userbox and saw you are a Spurs fan! Same here, man. And you are interested in tropical cyclones and you like Coldplay, like me. Just thought that'd be worth noting :) Shmego2 (talk) 02:22, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shmego! Glad to know that I am not alone in this world on those three (Spurs, TCs and Coldplay). Thanks for this message. Much appreciated :) Vida0007 (talk) 08:39, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! You delete with all storms typhoons! 120.29.69.16 (talk) 05:45, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Normalization

Well, whatever you said makes no sense. Andrew should be included. I guess when the damages are no longer enough for the top 10, then Andrew could be left off. That will happen soon. Delectable1 (talk) 06:36, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to see you elaborate as to why you think that whatever I said makes no sense. For starters, Milton's damage estimate – $30 billion – is greater than Andrew's $27.3 billion. You say "that will happen soon", but as of this writing, it already happened, and that is because of Milton; unless of course, Milton's damage estimates would be revised to an amount that is lower than that of Andrew's $27.3B. To be fair, there's a chance that scenario can materialize, as damage overestimations occurred in the past, most famously with Harvey in 2017 (which was initially estimated to have caused $198 billion worth of damages). If that happens, that's the only time that Andrew could – or shall I say, would – be reinstated in the Costliest US Atlantic hurricanes template. Vida0007 (talk) 06:52, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It has not happened yet. Look up what Andrew's damages would be in 2024 dollars. Delectable1 (talk) 22:18, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. That is why Andrew is included in this one: Template:Costliest U.S. Atlantic hurricanes by wealth normalization. Andrew was never removed there; you can even check the edit history of that one. Milton was added in the Costliest U.S. Atlantic hurricanes template (which is unadjusted for inflation and wealth normalization), not in the other template that was mentioned. Did you get confused by that? Vida0007 (talk) 00:55, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the following: people are not going to see that template. It appears a solution would be to include both templates on each of the articles where one is included now. Delectable1 (talk) 08:00, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Both articles now feature those respective templates though. Milton's article already features the template for costliest U.S. hurricanes, while the wealth normalization template has been in Andrew's article for eleven days now (see here). Do you still have a problem with that? Vida0007 (talk) 14:15, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is the wn template in the article for Milton? Delectable1 (talk) 21:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, because that template only includes storms that existed from 1900 to 2017. Vida0007 (talk) 02:44, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why would it only be on one article? It should be in the Milton article.Delectable1 (talk) 21:21, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently you're busy. I am asking this question. Why would it be in one article, Andrew? It should be in the article for Milton and others. Delectable1 (talk) 11:28, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are baffling me for almost a week now. How many times do I need to reiterate that the wealth normalization template shall only appear on Andrew's article because post-2017 hurricanes – including Milton – are not yet included in that (unless, of course, that gets revised soon)? Vida0007 (talk) 09:58, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ha, baffling is not all bad. It should be different. I will try to be plain here. I don't understand why both tables are not on each article for the Top 10 worst (for each of the charts). If you want me to argue why it should be that way, alright. Delectable1 (talk) 05:31, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you agreeable with asking how the two charts could appear on each page where a storm on the list is mentioned? Delectable1 (talk) 07:57, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will also make it simple, because this has been going for weeks now: The two tables/charts cannot appear on both because Milton is only qualified to appear on the first one (the costliest US hurricanes template), while Andrew is only qualified to appear on the second (the costliest adjusted for wealth normalization table). Vida0007 (talk) 14:51, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't realize we're going for basics. I propose a rule change if necessary. To put both sorts of tables on each article where it's pertinent (it is possible to append or adapt the charts). I will repeat... if someone doesn't even know to look at the wealth normalization table they won't know of its existence or the storms mentioned. Delectable1 (talk) 10:39, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

😤

for some reason i call you my “eternal enemy” becuase @MarioProtIV decided to pick your draft for Fourteen instead of mine. Still angry at you. LemonJuiceIsSour (talk) 03:43, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, were you formerly HurricaneKirk2024? I initially did not recognise you, sorry. And as for your sentiment, I think that is no longer my fault anymore, but I commend you for your honesty. Vida0007 (talk) 10:01, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I am formerly HurricaneKirk2024. I changed my username because it was recommended by @Hurricane Clyde. 🍋 🍋(talk!) 11:18, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@LemonJuiceIsSour, @Vida0007; you know there is a template called {{noping|Insert username}} for mentions where you don’t want the other pinged. Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 13:41, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And furthermore; I have to agree with @MarioProtIV on this. @Vida0007’s draft has the right name and more details. @LemonJuiceIsSour; you’re still learning, don’t take it too personally; you still tried, that’s the most important thing. Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 13:43, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok thx for the help :) 🍋 🍋(talk!) 15:11, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for 2024 Cuba blackouts

On 30 October 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2024 Cuba blackouts, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 15:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of storms named Narsing

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, List of storms named Narsing, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to Draft:List of storms named Narsing where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. I really recommend that you work on the article in draftspace, making sure that it is properly sourced and referenced using reliable and independent sources, before you decide to move it back to mainspace. Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 16:09, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weather of 2025 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Weather of 2025. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and there is no content. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. C F A 18:39, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retired Names

For the 2024 retired names in the WPAC, we do not need to wait for the final report of the Typhoon Committee since the WMO issued a press release which announced the retired names. Jason Rees (talk) 13:53, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I see. Thanks for informing me about this, Jason. Much appreciated. Vida0007 (talk) 14:36, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Piping links

Please do not introduce unnecessary piped links like this[1]. Redirects are fine as described at Wikipedia:Piped link#When not to use and Wikipedia:Redirect#Do not "fix" links to redirects that are not broken. It is also ultimately pointless to add them because every so often piped links are removed using automated tools, e.g.[2][3][4][5]. Celia Homeford (talk) 08:51, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This has been noted. Thank you for informing me. Vida0007 (talk) 11:15, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Guy Carleton, 1st Baron Dorchester, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carleton (federal electoral district).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:59, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Saging" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Saging has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 13 § Saging until a consensus is reached. ArthananWarcraft (talk) 11:55, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on List of Far Eastern University alumni

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of Far Eastern University alumni, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:35, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 2025

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to September 8. When you were adding content to the page, you added duplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in red at the top of the page. Thanks. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 06:46, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for discussion of Template:Costliest Pacific typhoons unadjusted for inflation

Template:Costliest Pacific typhoons unadjusted for inflation has been nominated for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:20, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for discussion of Template:Hurricane Helene related

Template:Hurricane Helene related has been nominated for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. element 14:29, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Vida0007. Thank you for your work on Marquess of Llevant de Mallorca. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for taking the time to create the article! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 12:14, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn: You're very welcome. And thank you for the appreciation! Have a nice day as well :) Vida0007 (talk) 13:26, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Tropical Strom Tapah (2025)

The page Tropical Strom Tapah (2025) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. jlwoodwa (talk) 06:52, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Alan Peter Cayetano. When you were adding content to the page, you added duplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in yellow at the top of the page. Thanks. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 07:05, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Already fixed them. Apologies. Vida0007 (talk) 07:06, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Typhoon Ragasa

On 25 September 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Typhoon Ragasa, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. – robertsky (talk) 03:49, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

PTC9

Just a heads up, I kinda made a draft for PTC9 under Draft:Tropical Storm Imelda (2025) as it seems guaranteed that it will develop. ✶Quxyz✶ (talk) 11:51, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up. Looks like yours is more detailed to be honest (and yours was made earlier than mine). Can our draft histories be merged though? Vida0007 (talk) 13:53, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not really sure, I am not an administrator. I would not be opposed to it though, if that is what you are asking. ✶Quxyz✶ (talk) 13:57, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I think we need an administrator for that, though I am glad that we are on the same page on this one. Vida0007 (talk) 14:04, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I partly blame myself for this as I was rather impatient and did not wait for Imelda to be designated, working on the article when it was AL94. ✶Quxyz✶ (talk) 13:58, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, that's alright. This is a system which has been talked about for days now, and it is now highly expected to bring impacts to Southeastern US in the coming week. There are no other disturbances waiting to develop (aside from the now-Cat 4 Humberto of course), so I think what you did is just okay. Vida0007 (talk) 14:05, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]