User talk:TheDocOck

August 2025

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edits you made did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit and/or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

or in the visual editor:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Describe what you changed

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! 🌊 oceanloop 22:50, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ocean, thank you for bringing this forward. I'll be sure to add edit summaries going forward!

Cheers, TheDocOck (talk) 22:53, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shared Health moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Shared Health. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Bakhtar40 (talk) 11:53, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for looking at this Bakhtar40! I'll revisit this and see where I can improve it for publication. TheDocOck (talk) 18:25, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chasing Summer (August 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chasing Summer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 05:39, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheDocOck! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 05:39, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ava Industries

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ava Industries requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 2A02:C7C:4D0A:A500:D166:DA64:AC83:4F4B (talk) 08:12, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

Hello, I'm JalenBarks. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Devonian Gardens—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Jalen Barks (Woof) 18:20, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jalen, my apologies, I'm researching how to nominate a draft to replace a redirect and must have done something. I'll be more cautious while working on this. TheDocOck (talk) 18:22, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Bank & Baron when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:47, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi TheDocOck. Thank you for your work on Devonian gardens. Another editor, Zzz plant, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Definitely notable, but there is a redirect (with non-negligible history) at the preferred title Devonian Gardens.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Zzz plant}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Zzz plant (talk) 19:08, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Devonian gardens

Hello, TheDocOck,

Thank you for creating Devonian gardens.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for creating this page. A lot of the sources seem to be to the city council, so it would be good to see more independent reviews of the gardens.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Northernhenge}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Northernhenge (talk) 19:47, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chasing Summer (September 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WeirdNAnnoyed was:

There is already an article with the title Chasing Summer. Suggest changing the title to "Chasing Summer (festival)" or something similar.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chasing Summer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 22:23, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]