User talk:Steph walker
Welcome!
[edit]{{helpme}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking 
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
|
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous
|
Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 19:32, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Beyond Limits 2025 (April 18)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Beyond Limits 2025 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
![]() |
Hello, Steph walker!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! BuySomeApples (talk) 07:36, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Dear BuySomeApples,
Thank you for taking the time to review my submission for the article “Beyond Limits.” I appreciate your feedback and have worked carefully to address the concerns you raised regarding tone, sourcing, and encyclopedic formatting.
Here is a summary of the improvements made: 1. Neutral and Formal Tone: Promotional language has been removed. The article now maintains a neutral and encyclopedic style in line with Wikipedia standards. 2. Reliable Sources Added: Multiple third-party, independent sources have been cited, including: • BBC News coverage • Bracknell News articles about the premiere and local impact • Ironman’s official All World Athlete ranking system • IMDb listing for the film 3. Encyclopedic Structure: The article has been restructured to follow a clear and recognized format (Synopsis, Participants, Production, Release, Reception, etc.). 4. Inline Citations: All claims of significance (e.g., AWA status, premiere details, production credits) are now properly referenced with inline citations using citation templates. 5. Objective Descriptions: Biographical descriptions of participants are concise and supported with citations rather than promotional in tone.
I’ve done my best to ensure this draft meets Wikipedia’s core content policies, including verifiability, neutrality, and no original research.
If there’s anything else I can do to bring this draft closer to acceptance, I’d be grateful for any further guidance.
Warm regards, Steph