User talk:Steph walker

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Steph walker! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 19:32, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beyond Limits 2025 (April 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by BuySomeApples were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
BuySomeApples (talk) 07:36, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Steph walker! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! BuySomeApples (talk) 07:36, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Steph walker (talk) 12:44, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear BuySomeApples,

Thank you for taking the time to review my submission for the article “Beyond Limits.” I appreciate your feedback and have worked carefully to address the concerns you raised regarding tone, sourcing, and encyclopedic formatting.

Here is a summary of the improvements made: 1. Neutral and Formal Tone: Promotional language has been removed. The article now maintains a neutral and encyclopedic style in line with Wikipedia standards. 2. Reliable Sources Added: Multiple third-party, independent sources have been cited, including: • BBC News coverage • Bracknell News articles about the premiere and local impact • Ironman’s official All World Athlete ranking system • IMDb listing for the film 3. Encyclopedic Structure: The article has been restructured to follow a clear and recognized format (Synopsis, Participants, Production, Release, Reception, etc.). 4. Inline Citations: All claims of significance (e.g., AWA status, premiere details, production credits) are now properly referenced with inline citations using citation templates. 5. Objective Descriptions: Biographical descriptions of participants are concise and supported with citations rather than promotional in tone.

I’ve done my best to ensure this draft meets Wikipedia’s core content policies, including verifiability, neutrality, and no original research.

If there’s anything else I can do to bring this draft closer to acceptance, I’d be grateful for any further guidance.

Warm regards, Steph