User talk:SprinklerLover12

Welcome!

Hello, SprinklerLover12!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:29, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Elizabeth Uihlein, from its old location at User:SprinklerLover12/sandboxUser:SprinklerLover12/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. ~Liance^talk 22:27, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Thanks for creating a draft!

Hello SprinklerLover12, welcome to Wikipedia! I wanted to thank you for submitting Draft:Elizabeth Uihlein to Articles for creation and helping to grow the encyclopedia. We appreciate your contributions and hope you stick around. I can see you've already started writing draft articles, so here are a few more resources that might be helpful:

If you have general editing questions, the Teahouse is where you can seek help from experienced editors. Questions about the draft creation and publishing process should be directed to the Articles for creation Help Desk instead, where you can get assistance directly from reviewers. Don't hesitate to reach out on my talk page if you have any specific questions. Once again, welcome – I hope you enjoy your time here! ~Liance^talk 22:28, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Elizabeth Uihlein has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Elizabeth Uihlein. Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:29, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Elizabeth Uihlein has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Elizabeth Uihlein. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:57, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Elizabeth Uihlein has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Elizabeth Uihlein. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:00, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elizabeth Uihlein (May 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gheus was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Richard and Elizabeth Uihlein instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elizabeth Uihlein and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gheus (talk) 10:30, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SprinklerLover12! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gheus (talk) 10:30, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the Talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Bleeng (talk) 02:38, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I try to be good about it. SprinklerLover12 (talk) 02:47, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

POV issues

This is a little concerning given other comments I have read such as this and edit warring on Flock Safety despite what I see is a lengthy discussion between other editors on the talk page. Please read WP:NPOV and WP:CIVILITY. --CNMall41 (talk) 05:18, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

At this point, I will need to ask. What is your connection to Flock? Please read WP:COI and WP:PAID and make the appropriate disclosure if applicable. --CNMall41 (talk) 15:41, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i have no connection to Flock or their competitors -- I feel it would be more appropriate to ask you the same question as you come off as having the intent of improving their image as much as possible. This feels dangerously close to hounding, biting, and a civility issue on your part.

I assure you there is no one out there offering money to compile details on such topics. SprinklerLover12 (talk) 11:16, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You do not need to be offered money to have a conflict of interest. COI is a standard question that is often asked when an editor engages in POV-pushing. If you take issue with me asking the question and you feel like it is hounding, biting, or a civility issue, you are free to report me at WP:ANI. I am not sure if you are being facetious or actually asking for an answer, but no, I do not have a connection in any form to Flock or its competitors (not paid, never been subject to their devices that I know of, and no axe to grind with them, don't know anyone who works for them or anything that could be considered a conflict under COI or PAID). --CNMall41 (talk) 03:27, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi SprinklerLover12! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

I've noticed that you've expressed an interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Unfortunately, due to a history of conflict and disruptive editing it has been designated a contentious topic and is subject to some strict rules.

The rule that affects you most as a new or IP editor is the prohibition on making any edit related to the Arab–Israel conflict, which includes discussing articles on talk pages, unless you are logged into an account that is at least 30 days old and has made at least 500 edits.

This prohibition is broadly construed, so it includes edits such as adding the reaction of a public figure concerning the conflict to their article or noting the position of a company or organization as it relates to the conflict.

The exception to this rule is that you may request a specific change to an article on the talk page of that article or at this page. Please ensure that your requested edit complies with our neutral point of view and reliable sourcing policies, and if the edit is about a living person our policies on biographies of living people as well.

Any edits you make contrary to these rules are likely to be reverted, and repeated violations can lead to you being blocked from editing.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

If you have questions, just use this link to ask for help; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!

Happy editing! Longhornsg (talk) 04:28, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]