User talk:Sigmazaad

Super Heavy

The table you added was moved to the List of Super Heavy boosters article. Please do not add it back to SpaceX Super Heavy. Redacted II (talk) 18:29, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Starship flight test 8, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Redacted II (talk) 16:20, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Franklin D. Roosevelt. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Remsense ‥ 论 23:14, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Joe Biden, you may be blocked from editing. —Eyer (he/him) If you reply, add {{reply to|Eyer}} to your message. 21:12, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Tesla Takedown. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. I don't see how a protest group would be able to impose "sanctions" on anything. Belbury (talk) 10:11, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Provisional Government of Saskatchewan. Belbury (talk) 06:07, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Brothers of Italy. Theofunny (talk) 17:30, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:46, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sigmazaad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ok fine i've thought about it, and i wont vandalize articles anymore and i will source all my claims and not use personal commentary on articles

Decline reason:

You need to show us that you understand why you were blocked and commit to avoiding that behavior in the future if you want to be unblocked. voorts (talk/contributions) 16:17, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sigmazaad (talk) 22:22, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why were you vandalizing articles in the first place? voorts (talk/contributions) 02:09, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i wasnt these people said i was even though i didnt Sigmazaad (talk) 15:34, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So, your claim, "i wont vandalize articles anymore", is an attempt to mislead us? This isn't looking good for your unblock chances. --Yamla (talk) 15:56, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

fuck you Sigmazaad (talk) 19:15, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

bro just delete this account i quit{{db-u1}}

Sigmazaad (talk) 19:28, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accounts cannot be deleted, and this page is not eligible for deletion. You can simply stop using this account if you wish. Remember, though, that blocks apply to the person, not just the account. Until this account is unblocked, you are not permitted to edit Wikipedia at all. You are still free to read all of Wikipedia if you wish. --Yamla (talk) 19:56, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sigmazaad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Sigmazaad (talk) 02:32, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You haven't provided a reason to be unblocked. PhilKnight (talk) 09:49, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Block evasion

This user has evaded their block using Confirmed socks, Azaad271011 and Azaadtheking. User talk:Azaadtheking had a transparent attempt to mislead us. --Yamla (talk) 22:18, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a way to find their IP range?

Blocking it for a decade (or however long a range can be blocked: I'm not an expert in this) would probably help prevent new socks. Redacted II (talk) 22:53, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]