User talk:Serebit

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

Welcome!

[edit]
Welcome!

Hello, Serebit, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Randykitty (talk) 20:45, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Canon EOS C50 moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Canon EOS C50, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 04:41, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Canon EOS C50 (September 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
RangersRus (talk) 17:07, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Truth be told, I'm surprised by this—the language in the Reception section is backed up by the articles cited, and I made sure to include majority secondary sources, none of which had major gripes that I could include. If any had negative things to say other than what I quoted, I couldn't find them. Serebit (talk) 17:11, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Canon EOS has failed

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Canon EOS has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Z1720 -- Z1720 (talk) 21:44, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leica S (Typ 006), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CCD. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mirrorless camera, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Canon EOS is under review

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Canon EOS is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Astral highway -- Astral highway (talk) 12:01, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Canon EOS has failed

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Canon EOS has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Astral highway -- Astral highway (talk) 03:42, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Canon EOS C50 has been accepted

[edit]
Canon EOS C50, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:20, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]