User talk:SATENDERA72

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

Your submission at Articles for creation: Waldia (April 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:
We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 17:27, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, SATENDERA72! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 17:27, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo
Hello! SATENDERA72, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 01:30, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:46, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SATENDERA72,
Just a reminder that you shouldn't be editing Wikipedia to promote any person or group, it's important to maintain NPOV and avoid writing on subjects where you have a conflict-of-interest. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:48, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
So pls help me I just want to add waldia castr in kumaoni rajput caste list SATENDERA72 (talk) 09:18, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hello SATENDERA72! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Want help, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:09, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Surender Singh Waldia

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Surender Singh Waldia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jesus isGreat7 ☾⋆ | Ping Me 17:31, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm JesusisGreat7. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jesus isGreat7 ☾⋆ | Ping Me 17:53, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok if I type it with hands you like it I will most it with my hand ok happy😊 SATENDERA72 (talk) 15:09, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello. Your recent edit to List of Kumaoni people appears to have added a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 15:00, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

he is notable dude search in google he is surender sin waldia indian rower SATENDERA72 (talk) 15:03, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
As stated in the post above "a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists" - He doesn't have an article on the English Wikipedia, which is what we call "notability", so he should not be added to any lists. - Arjayay (talk) 15:17, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Waldia, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft has no references. Notability cannot be established without references.

Do not resubmit this draft without references. You can ask for advice about references at the Teahouse.


Please do not submit multiple copies of drafts. It does not increase the likelihood that one of them will be accepted into article space, and annoys the reviewers. It is likely to be seen as an effort to game the system, and may result in the drafts being nominated for deletion.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 17:32, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

[edit]

Please help me with... hey I put a article but they remove it saying I need reference I didn't.have references but I want to post it SATENDERA72 (talk) 08:18, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you have no references, the topic cannot have an article on Wikipedia. We need to know where you are getting your information, as verifiability is a core principle of Wikipedia. Your personal word is insufficient. Please see Your First Article. 331dot (talk) 08:29, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
which type of reference I need to put my article if you tell I will provide SATENDERA72 (talk) 08:30, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 15:35, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Waldia (2) (August 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Waldia (2), which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please ask for advice at the Teahouse before resubmitting.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 16:18, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

[edit]

Please help me with... 

SATENDERA72 (talk) 16:18, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i need references for waldia caste of Uttrakhand i putted some references where Waldia caste is mention but they are not accepting it why

No, you need to find somewhere else to edit. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 20:23, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Waldia (2) (August 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Largely incomprehensible.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 16:34, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days in order to make edits related to two subtopics: (1) Indian military history, or (2) social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Tenshi! (Talk page) 20:22, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Waldia (2) (August 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
Theroadislong (talk) 16:51, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Waldia (2)

[edit]

Thank you for your interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption, a special set of rules apply to anyone editing in this topic area. Specifically, only extended confirmed editors are allowed to make direct edits and page creations to this topic area. Since you currently do not meet the requirements to contribute to this topic area, the page you created has been nominated for speedy deletion under G5.

If you think this page does not fall under the general sanctions described, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally you may wish to read about the topic restrictions here. OutsideNormality (talk) 02:32, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 2025

[edit]
Stop icon
To enforce an arbitration decision, and for repeated violations of WP:ARBECR in WP:CT/SA even after being warned and made aware of restrictions (also clear WP:NOTHERE behavior), you have been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. 

Sohom (talk) 04:38, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes"). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

Speedy deletion of Draft:Waldia

[edit]
Warning icon

The page Draft:Waldia has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

G5: WP:ARBECR enforcement for WP:GSCASTE@WP:CT/SA

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sohom (talk) 05:07, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]