User talk:Rubintyrann

Welcome!

Hello, Rubintyrann, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! —Ganesha811 (talk) 23:51, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Death of Marcia Powell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iliac artery. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1980 Hamburg arson attack has been accepted

1980 Hamburg arson attack, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 19:30, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Manfred Roeder, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neukirchen.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Martin Peyerl, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:41, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not content removal as much as restructuring. The Martin Peyerl article (as well as Günter Hermann Ewen) miss the point in that the perpetrators are much less notable than the killings they committed. Presenting the articles as biographies and the shootings as their notable acts simply does not apply. Neither media, academic mention or even documentaries write/talk about the shooters. Its always about the shooting itself. Hence why the shootings should be the focus of the article. Rubintyrann (talk) 23:58, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Talk:Martin Peyerl. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Why did you attempt to move the talk page of the article without moving the main page? Please do not do this again. If you want a page to be moved go to WP:RM. CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:47, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops. I wanted to move the main page. I thought using the move tool on the talk page would make it a request rather than an immediate move. My mistake. As for my reasoning, I put it in the summary and will repeat it here.

The shooting is much more significant than its perpetrator (compare Mark O. Barton to 1999 Atlanta day trading firm shootings move). German and Polish articles similarly title their articles "Bad Reichenhall (rampage) shooting". Articles about Peyerl's killings focus more on the shooting than Peyerl as an individual. Nearly all of them refer to the shooting in Bad Reichenhall, not the mass murderer Martin Peyerl. Rubintyrann (talk) 23:54, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please file a move request at WP:RM, and an admin or page mover will move the page for you. If the request is controversial, however, you'll have to open a move discussion. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:58, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:International Working Men's Educational Club has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:International Working Men's Educational Club. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 18:49, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I did worry that the article would strive a bit far from the club itself, but I also figured that the Jack the Ripper connection was a fairly significant event that warranted dedicating a bulk of the article to the discovery of Elizabeth Stride. I originally intended to make a separate article about Louis Diemschütz before merging the content of both drafts, resulting in the awkward shift in focus. The discovery section in Elizabeth Stride's article is almost word for word the commonly reprinted description made by Louis Diemschütz at the inquest, hence why I got a little too into the details writing the events down in this draft. Much of it could definitely be trimmmed down to maybe three smaller paragraphs and included in Stride's article instead.

As for the Jack the Ripper theory section, again, a leftover from the Louis Diemschütz draft. The potential for criticisim was mentioned and sidestepped by the author of the book in citation 42, where he referred to all his findings as "compelling coincidences" and also acknowledges that the book is basically just the course of his own research styled in a detective narrative. The theory isn't very accepted, but at the time of writing, the theory felt novel and maybe of interest enough to be included. I can just as easily remove the whole section since it really isn't as noteworthy or relevant to either the club or the Whitechapel murders as I initially felt. Rubintyrann (talk) 19:57, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sittensen murders has been accepted

Sittensen murders, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lettler^{hello • contribs} 20:09, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: International Working Men's Educational Club (March 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spinster300 was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read "What Wikipedia is not" for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:International Working Men's Educational Club and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spinster300 (talk) 10:12, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rubintyrann! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spinster300 (talk) 10:12, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Utrecht tram shooting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Silencer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:02, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marshall Browne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Hello, I'm Sundayclose. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Aptronym, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 13:43, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:1970 Munich arson attack

Hello, Rubintyrann. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1970 Munich arson attack, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2012 Karlsruhe murders

Hello, Rubintyrann. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2012 Karlsruhe murders, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:08, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Louis Diemschütz

Hello, Rubintyrann. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Louis Diemschütz, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:07, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2012 Karlsruhe murders

Hello, Rubintyrann. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "2012 Karlsruhe murders".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 20:25, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Louis Diemschütz

Hello, Rubintyrann. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Louis Diemschütz".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 03:25, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2024–2025 German New Year's Eve pyrotechnics incidents for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024–2025 German New Year's Eve pyrotechnics incidents, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024–2025 German New Year's Eve pyrotechnics incidents until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:International Working Men's Educational Club

Hello, Rubintyrann. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:International Working Men's Educational Club, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:06, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:International Working Men's Educational Club

Hello, Rubintyrann. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "International Working Men's Educational Club".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 10:26, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]