User talk:RH805

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ronnie Haran (November 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by PARAKANYAA was:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Random boldings, chatgpt source left in refs, written like AI, largely unsourced. No.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
PARAKANYAA (talk) 19:30, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, RH805! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! PARAKANYAA (talk) 19:30, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ronnie Haran (November 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Guninvalid were:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
This submission appears to read more like a résumé than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, that provide secondary analysis of the subject's life in context. In contrast, résumés will tend to list individual accomplishments and rely on self-published sources, which might unduly focus on positive events and fail to properly balance their weight. Please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies by using independent, reliable sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Multiple uncited sections and unsourced statements, and generic rule of three statements like "noted for her role in discovering, nurturing, and managing musical talent".
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
guninvalid (talk) 10:03, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ronnie Haran (December 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Monkeysmashingkeyboards was:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
While a lot better than before, swaths of the article still reek of LLM.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
monkeysmashingkeyboards (talk) 20:42, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ronnie Haran (December 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AlphaBetaGamma were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
You need to entirely rewrite the AI version or revise all of it. There are some bits remaining. Please don't use WP:IMDB or WP:DISCOGS.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 23:41, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am clearly not understanding what parts you are assuming are written by AI. Can you please be specific? Vaguely stating and assuming that it sounds like AI is unhelpful. RH805 (talk) 00:10, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Things like While reviewing her personal archive of photographs, art collections, and memorabilia, she and her team have expressed hopes of developing a documentary to chronicle her life, work, and creative legacy. was left unchanged from the previous decline prior to my review. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 01:49, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
thank you, that is helpful i appreciate it. RH805 (talk) 22:53, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ronnie Haran (December 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Thilio were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 08:42, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]