User talk:Prabodha K Meher

Prabodha K Meher, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Prabodha K Meher! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Agalpur, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gigs (talk) 16:26, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Legacypac (talk) 08:59, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kaushala Prasad Mishra (April 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kaushala Prasad Mishra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 01:18, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kaushala Prasad Mishra (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No significant coverage and most of these sources are poor to unreliable to dead urls.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kaushala Prasad Mishra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 15:32, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Kaushala Prasad Mishra has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kaushala Prasad Mishra. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 15:19, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kaushala Prasad Mishra has been accepted

Kaushala Prasad Mishra, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

GoldRomean (talk) 13:32, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GoldRomean,

Thanks for accepting the article. also thanks to all the reviewers. I learned many things in article creation.

Kind regards,

Prabodha Prabodha K Meher (talk) 14:01, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I hope you decide to stay and continue contributing. GoldRomean (talk) 14:31, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

COI inquiry: Kaushala Prasad Mishra

Hey, I noticed that you claim File:Kaushala Prasad Mishra.png as your own work. Could you clarify the extent of your relationship with Kaushala Prasad Mishra in compliance with WP:COI? _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:12, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rosguill,

Thanks for reaching me. I am old student of Kaushala Prasad Mishra. I had this image and uploaded in good faith.

Let me know if any changes required. Appreciate your help.

Kind regards,

Prabodha Prabodha K Meher (talk) 21:02, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I've gone ahead and added an appropriate template to the article's talk page. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:48, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Society for Radiation Research moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Society for Radiation Research. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Broc (talk) 15:34, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Broc, Thanks for your message. I would like to clarify that my conflict of interest is already disclosed, I would appreciate if you mention what are the improvement this article needs. Prabodha K Meher (talk) 15:54, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Society for Radiation Research (June 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Primary sources do not establish notability per WP:ORG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Society for Radiation Research and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:25, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! can you please help in improving this article. Prabodha K Meher (talk) 14:31, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]