User talk:Pgrondier

This is Pgrondier's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Your submission at Articles for creation: Accounting for sustainability: the C.A.R.E. project (April 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spinster300 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see: WP:NPOV. Kind regards, Spinster300 (talk) 16:27, 5 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Accounting for sustainability: the C.A.R.E. project and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spinster300 (talk) 16:27, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pgrondier! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spinster300 (talk) 16:27, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That was indeed a bit of a disappointment, but first of all thanks for your time and your input. I would like to check directly which parts of / sentences in the article are not written from a neutral point of view. That will help me concentrate on improving those before re-submitting the article. Pgrondier (talk) 04:28, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Accounting for sustainability: the C.A.R.E. project has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Accounting for sustainability: the C.A.R.E. project. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 10:02, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Pgrondier! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Help with my first draft article, that just got refused for not respecting NPOV rules, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:22, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Draft v1

Hello, Pgrondier. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Draft v1, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:07, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Draft v1

Hello, Pgrondier. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Draft v1".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 10:26, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Accounting for sustainability: the C.A.R.E. project (September 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rambley was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Many parts of the article are unsourced. The language used throughout still makes me think this is an advertisement. At the very least, this needs to be revised to be more neutral and use less jargon.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Accounting for sustainability: the C.A.R.E. project and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rambley ^{(talk / contribs)} 13:30, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]