User talk:OneOldNewspaperFan

Archives

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, linking to me ({{Ping|OneOldNewspaperFan}}), so that I will be notified.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, linking to your username, so that you will be notified.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

March 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Schneider's Bakery, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 15:19, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Schneider's Bakery. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 15:21, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Magical Golden Whip:I've been editing on here for over 10 years. I fail to understand your logic that my edits weren't constructive. I literally properly cited the California Business Search the EXACT same was it's cited for Walt Disney Pictures. The correct date Schneider's Bakery was formed was August 1999, as proved without doubt by the legal state of California documents. There is nothing, absolutely nothing, that trumps that information. It doesn't matter the first show the company didn't produce wasn't for another 5 years, the company was established in 1999. Where are your sources the company was established in 2003? Zero you have zero, you've cited no sources. Where as I have proven my sources. Your edits are being disruptive to the accuracy of Wikipedia. Chrisisreed (talk) 15:25, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sources do not go in the edit summary, you most properly format the source in the article. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 15:31, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Schneider's Bakery shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 15:32, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are being unconstructive and disruptive to wikipedia. You aren't paying attention to any of the edits you keep undoing. You say I haven't cited my source, but it is an inline citation in the very first sentence of the article. Don't threaten me with limiting my editing powers. You are 100% the issue here. @Magical Golden Whip: I have properly cited sources you are dismissing and reverting, you are providing nothing to the article, and you are failing to cite your source the company was established in 2003. Chrisisreed (talk) 15:37, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, just found the source in the article. I was wrong on this one. I was looking at the info box. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 15:49, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate you acknowledging the mistake. Could you please change it back so my citation continues to be sourced, now other people have gotten involved in the “edit war.” @Magical Golden Whip: Chrisisreed (talk) 15:53, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Chrisisreed. Thank you for your work on Great Southwest Corporation. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 09:21, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Love Boats

Hello, Chrisisreed. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Love Boats, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:07, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Warner Bros. Global Brands and Experiences attractions has been nominated for discussion

Category:Warner Bros. Global Brands and Experiences attractions has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 22:55, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about List of Blair Witch characters

Hello Chrisisreed, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, List of Blair Witch characters, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Blair Witch characters.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Conyo14}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Conyo14 (talk) 04:29, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Antonia Graza

Hello, Chrisisreed. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Antonia Graza, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:08, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Exoneration of witches

As a heads up, in case you had not seen, it has been widely reported that the Maryland General Assembly is considering a witchcraft exoneration bill. There was an article about it this morning in the New York Times. I hope that our work on witch trials in Maryland, Moll Dyer, and Rebecca Fowler played a role! Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 20:47, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Victorious in Concert poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Victorious in Concert poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Society of Explorers and Adventurers

Hello, Chrisisreed. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Society of Explorers and Adventurers".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:34, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Chrisisreed. Thank you for your work on Charles Baltimore Calvert. Another editor, Moriwen, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Moriwen}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

— Moriwen (talk) 00:30, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Warner Bros. Feature Animation Logo.png

Thank you for uploading File:Warner Bros. Feature Animation Logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:33, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Phantom of Manhattan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 14:33, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I didn’t add that portion to the article, I actually only moved it down the page from Development to adaptation. OneOldNewspaperFan (talk) 14:49, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that you didn't add it initially, but when you moved it you did assume responsibility for it. You're welcome to reinsert it with a CN tag if you're so inclined, but it shouldn't be allowed to remain in the article without sourcing. DonIago (talk) 16:46, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hollywood Boulevard (theme parks) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hollywood Boulevard (theme parks) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hollywood Boulevard (theme parks) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

(Oinkers42) (talk) 02:53, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hollywood Boulevard Parque Warner Madrid logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hollywood Boulevard Parque Warner Madrid logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:21, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Warner Bros. Hotel Concept Art.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Warner Bros. Hotel Concept Art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]