User talk:Conyo14

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5

NPP Awards for 2024

		The New Page Reviewer's NPP Barnstar Award
		This award is given in recognition to Conyo14 for conducting 306 article reviews in 2024. Thank you so much for all your excellent work. Keep it up! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:16, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

NHL history DYK

I'm going to go ahead and nominate the History article for DYK - I'll list you as a co-nom, and feel free to add any altblurbs. Given the article's scope, there's certainly no shortage! The Kip ^(contribs) 18:56, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

IPs on the loose.

I've undone a lot of edits to NHL season pages, by IPs 162.197.249.249 & 184.55.60.49. They've also made changes to several other ice hockey pages, in the last two or so months. I don't know if they're making positive changes or not. GoodDay (talk) 21:11, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for History of the National Hockey League (2017–present)

On 19 February 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article History of the National Hockey League (2017–present), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that National Hockey League players have not yet participated at the Olympics since the league entered its second century of operation? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/History of the National Hockey League (2017–present). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, History of the National Hockey League (2017–present)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Stanley Cup playoffs

May as well get this subsection started. Keep an eye out, Khoa is up to their usual announcers crap in the main space again. Deadman137 (talk) 02:36, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

He deleted it for the prior years after it ended. I'm thinking of a way to do it in prose rather than a table. Conyo14 (talk) 03:28, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you could find a way to squeeze it down to a paragraph that could make it suitable. If it's too much work just keep things as they are and we can just add the broadcasters to the Finals article as we currently do. Deadman137 (talk) 03:42, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

After having two games end at the same time I'd rather do the six elimination games in one day again, at least those were spread out. Deadman137 (talk) 05:33, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Deadman137: This was only game one too! It doesn't help that the time of the games are weird to say the very least. Conyo14 (talk) 05:54, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well don't look at tonight's schedule then. Thankfully it's only the first round where the risk for that is highest. Though it's rare where you get an overtime game taking place at the same time as two teams decide to hang their goalies out to dry. Deadman137 (talk) 23:54, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I added the missing citations for you for the two series that ended tonight, so I made up for my screw up last night, (sadly I didn't remember that the Carolina series ended yesterday). Deadman137 (talk) 03:08, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently Rantanen became the first player to record a third period playoff hat trick in league history, likely game seven specific. I'll skim the league article when it comes out. It's rare enough to consider for the lead. Deadman137 (talk) 02:58, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa really? Let me reword that final statement then. Conyo14 (talk) 03:02, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It was mentioned on the Sportsnet broadcast, we'll probably need a second citation, I'm scanning for it now. Deadman137 (talk) 03:10, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AP has him as the second player to record four points in the third period of a game seven. Still looking for the hat trick one. Deadman137 (talk) 03:17, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here is one link [1] Deadman137 (talk) 03:52, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's not great. Ideally something from TSN or Sportsnet. Conyo14 (talk) 03:55, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sporting News has it [2]. I'll keep digging in the morning to see what else is available. Deadman137 (talk) 05:46, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The league also just published this [3] so we have enough to substantiate our claim. Deadman137 (talk) 05:55, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That'll do Conyo14 (talk) 06:03, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm waiting for the articles to start coming out though that was the latest tying goal in a seventh game. The previous latest tying goal off the top of my head was Matt Cooke in 2004 Calgary/Vancouver series, I'm waiting for confirmation. Deadman137 (talk) 03:21, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Deadman137: I would like a ref for the comparison to the Easter Epic. If it's in the recap ref (I don't think it is) then that'll do. Conyo14 (talk) 06:03, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[4] Found it. Deadman137 (talk) 14:13, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So if Florida moves on then we know that the Western champion will have home ice in the Finals. Deadman137 (talk) 01:49, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There actually was a small spacing error on the Carolina/Washington citation from last night and I already fixed it. Now I don't know why we've had two editors have been trying to change the dating format of the citation when all they needed to do was add one space. Deadman137 (talk) 21:27, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I was legitimately wondering what was going on there. I'm glad that was a simple fix then. Conyo14 (talk) 23:25, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't help but laugh when I realized that it was just a simple typo. I hope that we're not losing our edge. Deadman137 (talk) 23:34, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Saw this discussion and wanted to notify you and Deadman137 about Khoa41860 since that editor was mentioned here – Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Khoa41860. So do not be suprised if a new editor comes and starts doing the usual stuff for which Khoa41860 is known. – sbaio 10:37, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion of hyphen on "2025 Stanley Cup playoffs" article

Hi Conyo14. At 10:39 on April 20, I used AutoWikiBroswer to check the "2025 Stanley Cup playoffs" article. It suggested some formatting changes and also suggested adding a hyphen for "second-round games" in the sentece: "First and second-round games are split between ESPN-produced telecasts (either on ESPN, ABC, or ESPN2) and TNT Sports-produced telecasts (either on TNT or TBS, with selected simulcasts on TruTV). Each U.S. team's regional broadcaster will also televise local coverage of first-round games, except for any games on ABC." I then examined the proposed changes and then made the edit.[5] At 15:51, you then reverted my edit with the edit summary noting "not a typo".[6] In this case "second-round" acts as a compound adjective modifying the noun "games." When two or more words come before a noun and together describe it, they are generally hyphenated to show that they function as a single descriptive unit. If anything, the "first" in the sentence appears it might qualify for a suspended hyphen per MOS:SUSPENDED. Can you explain why you reverted the edit? Thanks! Wikipedialuva (talk) 02:05, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, the reason why is because I wanted to change wording altogether. Apologies, let me do that now. Conyo14 (talk) 02:31, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, and thanks for updating the wording and making the other articles consistent! Wikipedialuva (talk) 03:08, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed the wording. I shall make the other articles as consistent. Conyo14 (talk) 02:35, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Conyo19

I noticed you share a similar name with a Youtube channel that covers hockey, Conyo19. Do you by any chance happen to be related? Mk8mlyb (talk) 06:36, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They've got a good name. There are a lot with that nickname though. It's cool that they cover ice hockey too! Conyo14 (talk) 07:05, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol May 2025 Backlog drive

May 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 May 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Pages Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:25, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

Is there a place I can go to ask if a source is reliable? I could use one right now. Mk8mlyb (talk) 01:27, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Mk8mlyb: what for? I can help Conyo14 (talk) 02:29, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This article right here. The consensus on Kotaku is that articles from 2023 to now are generally not reliable, but that this is not a firm line and that articles should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Mk8mlyb (talk) 02:45, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Mk8mlyb: This is a tricky article for sure. It's probably a fine source given it's just a ranking article, though I would pair with another source. Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources will let you know which websites are unreliable and which ones are good. Conyo14 (talk) 04:12, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All right, I appreciate your help. Thanks. Mk8mlyb (talk) 04:54, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stanley Cup playoffs

Holy cow, did you watch the playoffs? The Panthers just scored two goals with under 4 minutes left to win! I thought they were dead! Mk8mlyb (talk) 01:45, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a forum. Please don't use this as such. Conyo14 (talk) 02:59, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. Is there a forum of any kind on Wikipedia? Mk8mlyb (talk) 03:05, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No Conyo14 (talk) 04:45, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Stanley Cup playoffs

Did you undo my edit? I noticed you removed some information I thought was crucial. Mk8mlyb (talk) 02:55, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, just corrective editing. Remember that you're a taking a fan's pov instead of a neutral POV. Conyo14 (talk) 03:08, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What's biased about saying "the Panthers scored two goals in 11 seconds with four minutes left to take the lead"? I've seen other Stanley Cup playoffs articles say similar things. The way I see it, saying that is more informative and stands out than saying a player scored a goal and an assist. Mk8mlyb (talk) 03:19, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

By all means, add it in. Just know that there is no "crucial" information. This is Wikipedia, not a news source. Conyo14 (talk) 03:40, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. For the record, I realize I need to understand policy better before choosing what to edit. I just like to put some energy and life into the articles. Mk8mlyb (talk) 04:22, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that. I've been doing this consistently for nine years and believe me when I say I wish they had more life, but maintaining WP:NPOV is important when writing content. Fortunately, the flare can be seen in the Finals articles. Conyo14 (talk) 04:54, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2021-22 Florida Panthers

I have taken a look at the 2021-22 Florida Panthers page, and I think there needs to be a paragraph or statement about how the team had one of the greatest offenses in league history. Where would be a good place to put it and how would we state that? Mk8mlyb (talk) 01:51, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a source to back that statement? Conyo14 (talk) 03:36, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This one right here: [7]. Mk8mlyb (talk) 03:57, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't say it's one of the greatest offenses in league history, but the best since the Penguins 1995–96 season. Conyo14 (talk) 04:30, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]