User talk:MyGosh789

Welcome!

Hello, MyGosh789!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, 〜 Adflatuss • talk 15:19, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Tupac Shakur

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Tupac Shakur, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:07, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cleveland Guardians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Dolan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bugliosi on Oswald midnight press conference

Thanks for your inclusion of Bill Mercer who has been identified as the reporter telling Oswald he was charged. I think the comments made by Vincent Bugliosi about Oswald’s reaction to be charged at midnight press conference are pertininent, and WP:NPOV requires that we present various sides of a story, if there are good sources. Bugliosi is an excellent source, and this can be included in the last paragraph “arrest at Texas threatre section” on the Oswald page. Something written like this, to note Oswald voice breaking and how he seemed to react at told he was charged:

“A reporter asked Oswald, "Did you kill the President?" and Oswald answered, "No, I have not been charged with that. In fact, nobody has said that to me yet." Oswald continued, "The first thing I heard about it was when the newspaper reporters in the hall (at this point, Oswald's voice cracked nervously) asked me that question."^[1] Bill Mercer told Oswald that he had been charged. Oswald asked "Sir?" and when Mercer affirmed again that he had been charged, Oswald reacted with a look of astonishment.”^[2] 78.150.8.113 (talk) 17:26, 24 March 2025 (UTC) 78.150.8.113 (talk) 17:26, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1. "Oswald's Ghost". www.pbs.org. Retrieved May 10, 2018.
2. Bugliosi, Vincent (2008) Four Days in November: The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy pp. 300

April 2025

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. livelikemusic (TALK!) 23:42, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Sahaib. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Bruce Fanjoy, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sahaib (talk) 17:44, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Killing of Patrick Lyoya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WOOD.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Official overseas trips

You are a significant contributor to our list of Charles III's international travel. I would like your help on a similar page for Princess Anne. Robin S. Taylor (talk) 16:11, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michigan Wolverines football, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matt Weiss.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Diddy yacht

Hello,

Thank you for updating the information regarding the Chris Brown rape lawsuit. I noticed a small discrepancy: you mentioned that the docuseries revealed the yacht was owned by controversial music producer Sean "Diddy" Combs. However, this detail was actually reported in the original 2022 lawsuit.

Could you please correct this information accordingly? Thank you for your attention to this matter. J-Majestik (talk) 12:49, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you're ignoring this message. Should I interpret this as an indication that the discrepancy was intentional and that this constitutes a case of Wikipedia:False and malicious outing? Let me know because I'm on my way to reporting you.J-Majestik (talk) 15:41, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Rick Derringer

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Rick Derringer, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:08, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Katie Miller, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

The Show preview button is right next to the Publish changes button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. —tony^{st (talk)} 02:40, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Long Way Home (anti-drug PSA

A tag has been placed on The Long Way Home (anti-drug PSA requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 204.111.137.20 (talk) 03:49, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on 2025 San Antonio mayoral election

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2025 San Antonio mayoral election, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:45, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

We need to wait for the CERTIFIED OFFICIAL results before posting the San Antonio election. Please stop posting unofficial results. - SanAnMan (talk) 02:14, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

You have recently made edits related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. This is a standard message to inform you that India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. TEMPO156 (talk) 22:19, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Republican insurgency in Afghanistan, you may be blocked from editing. TEMPO156 (talk) 22:20, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Don't call it "vandalism," as they do have territory in Panjshir.MyGosh789 (talk) 22:23, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Republican insurgency in Afghanistan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Above remarks submitted by Noorullah21.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Noorullah (talk) 00:48, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at John Wayne.
Please use edit summaries, you've been asked before - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 21:00, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Above remarks submitted by FlightTime Phone.

How is it "disruption." I was looking for the right section to put the I Love Liberty clip edit. I figured it should be in his personal and social views section. Don't rush to judgement and read the source for yourself.[1]MyGosh789 (talk) 21:03, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In your recent avalanche of editing for the article Trial of Sean Combs, there were many errors, no doubt due to hastiness. Please, do try and review your edits before posting them up. It saves everyone's time, including yours. Take care. -The Gnome (talk) 18:18, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is MyGosh789. Thank you. TEMPO156 (talk) 22:45, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MyGosh789,

It would be worth your time to come to Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#MyGosh789 and offer your perspective on this complaint. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:25, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Trial of Sean Combs

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Trial of Sean Combs, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:35, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Billy Joel

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Billy Joel, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:49, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 2025

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Flaco Jiménez, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.

Please review the documentation for that template @ {{Recent death}} - FlightTime (open channel) 16:55, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember that {{recent death}} is not a template to play with As such, this template should be used only in cases where many editors (perhaps dozens or more) are editing the article on the same day. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:04, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mandalay Pictures. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 17:43, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is true, the film got a theatrical release today. They opted not to make Highest 2 Lowest a "direct-to-video" film.MyGosh789 (talk) 17:44, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Acroterion (talk) 12:10, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Never intended to make an edit to the Jane Fonda page without a reliable source. It was just something I heard and wanted clarification on.MyGosh789 (talk) 12:13, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The WP:BLP policy applies everywhere on Wikipedia. Talkpages aren't fora for speculation about living persons. Acroterion (talk) 12:22, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.MyGosh789 (talk) 13:03, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

Your recent editing history at The Beatles' 1966 US tour shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. An edit war occurs when two or more users begin repeatedly changing content—in a back-and-forth fashion—back to how they think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree with their changes. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward creating a version of the page that represents consensus among the editors involved. The best practice at this stage is to discuss the disagreements, issues, and concerns at-hand, not to engage in edit-warring. Wikipedia provides a page that details how this is accomplished. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sundayclose (talk) 22:22, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You had complaints about that one source, so I provided a second source.[2]MyGosh789 (talk) 22:23, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This one is not worth the battle so I'm leaving it. But your warning about edit warring stands. I advise reading WP:3RR AND WP:BRD to avoid losing your editing privileges if you again engage in edit warring. Sundayclose (talk) 22:25, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Beatles' 1966 US tour. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

You did not follow the BRD advice though. You didn't discuss.MyGosh789 (talk) 22:51, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. You have exceeded WP:3RR. Tkbrett (✉) 22:48, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I did discuss on the talk page. You didn't though.MyGosh789 (talk) 22:49, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see you did not follow Sundayclose's advice and read WP:3RR AND WP:BRD since you chose to instantly revert your changes back a fourth time without waiting for a talk page consensus to form. Tkbrett (✉) 22:50, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't follow the WP:BRD advice, as you didn't discuss on the talk page.MyGosh789 (talk) 22:52, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MyGosh789, you could be blocked right now for edit warring. You were already warned about edit warring and you did it again. I suggesting reverting your last edit to the article and resolving this on the talk page. I can't promise that will avoid a block, but it would be a good faith effort on your part. Reverting more than three times is sufficient for a block, even if your edit is correct. Sundayclose (talk) 22:53, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Burning Man

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Burning Man, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:23, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Shall fix the typo.MyGosh789 (talk) 10:24, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I Don't Go Against The Word Of The Film Festival Where EPIC: Elvis Presley in Concert Premiered

The Toronto International Film Festival specifically stated "Baz Luhrmann’s extraordinary documentary may be the most poignant account of Elvis Presley’s life and career to date, featuring long-lost footage from his epochal 1970s residency in Las Vegas "[3]MyGosh789 (talk) 20:34, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

simpleflying

A courtesy note to let you know that simpleflying is not a reliable source - WP:SIMPLEFLYING. Thanks. 10mmsocket (talk) 15:20, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on 2025 state visit by Donald Trump to the United Kingdom

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2025 state visit by Donald Trump to the United Kingdom, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:37, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2026 Sundance Film Festival for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2026 Sundance Film Festival is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2026 Sundance Film Festival until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Cameremote (talk) 02:18, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AFD Closed!

Hello! I have closed the AFD for 2026 Sundance Film Festival. You can take your time to work on it. But while at it, it is better to move the page to draft and finish working on it before pushing to mainspace. That way, you will not have issues with speedy deletions. Thank you for your work on Wikipedia! Cameremote (talk) 03:29, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]