User talk:Mrtierne

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lethal Company (November 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails WP:GNG, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 21:52, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Mrtierne! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 21:52, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lethal Company has been accepted

[edit]
Lethal Company, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 20:55, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Predecessor (January 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sungodtemple were:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
To count towards notability, sources must be independent. The game website, a listing, and interviews don't count.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 23:08, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Predecessor (January 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mach61 were:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The Escapist article is the only secondary source cited.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Mach61 (talk) 05:54, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Predecessor

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Mrtierne. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Predecessor, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:13, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Megabonk moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Megabonk. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 17:58, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there's some machine-generated but for the formatting and links. It's very helpful to get pages ups. Mrtierne (talk) 18:16, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is half your links don’t lead anywhere, as LLM’s often make links up, therefore meaning that your text is unsourced and so it needs proper sourcing. Also, user generated content is not a reliable source so your article has almost no sources at all. I suggest finding better sources and then submitting it for review. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 18:40, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good. Let me go through them and update accordingly. I'll be more careful in the future. Mrtierne (talk) 18:56, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ping me when you have done it and I will be happy to review it. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 18:56, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
OK I republished with updated and confirmed links. Any advice on getting images in since I don't own them. Mrtierne (talk) 20:36, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I’m not an expert on this bit of Wikipedia. I think WP:NFCCP is relevant but you might want to ask at the teahouse or another help forum instead. Just so you are aware, citations 2, 10, 16 and 19 are considered generally unreliable. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 07:41, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good re: teahouse. For sources, especially when it comes to indie games a lot of the coverage happens on YouTube in video form. Any recommendations there? Mrtierne (talk) 15:59, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
YouTube is user generated and therefore not considered to be a reliable source. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 16:44, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Understood, thank you for your help/support on all of this. Mrtierne (talk) 17:05, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]