User talk:Mirza Limon Hossain

November 2025

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:30, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mirza Limon Hossain (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello. I understand that my account was blocked because it may have appeared to be connected to other accounts. However, I would like to clarify that I have only this one account — I have never used or created any other Wikipedia accounts. It might have looked suspicious because my name or username is similar to another person’s, but I assure you that there was no intention of misuse. I only wanted to contribute information about Bangladeshi arts and film in good faith. I sincerely apologize for any misunderstanding and promise to carefully follow all Wikipedia rules, including neutrality and reliable sourcing, in the future. Please consider reviewing this block. Thank you. Mirza Limon Hossain (talk) 18:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed to Mirja Limon, Limon Sanmo BD. Yamla (talk) 19:27, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mirza Limon Hossain (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I respectfully request a review of my block.

The block reason states that my account is "Confirmed to Mirja Limon / Limon Sanmo BD". I want to clearly state that I do not own or operate any other Wikipedia accounts. I have never edited using "Mirja Limon", "Limon Sanmo BD", or any similar account. I only use this single account.

It is possible that the name similarity caused confusion, but I assure you there is no connection. I understand Wikipedia’s rules regarding multiple accounts and block evasion, and I have strictly followed them.

My contributions were good-faith attempts to create a properly sourced biography using reliable national newspapers (The Daily Star, Prothom Alo, Ittefaq, Channel i Online, etc.). I am willing to fully cooperate with all policies and to avoid editing any topic where there may be a conflict of interest.

I kindly request reconsideration of the block as this appears to be a false positive. Thank you. Mirza Limon Hossain (talk) 21:34, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 00:33, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Three accounts with "Limon" in their names, two of them differing only by a single letter (Mirza versus Mirja), all responsible within a short period for creating articles about a company and its founder and being virtually the only contributors of substance to those articles. And that's even before the technical findings that would have come from the "checkuserblock-account" confirmed their relatedness. Oh, on top of all that I now see that the account previously named "Mirza Limon" was moved to "Limon Sanmo BD". So all these accounts have, at some point, been some variation of "Mir[j|z]a Limon". Largoplazo (talk) 23:28, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]