... using emerging technologies/synergies/[other vague buzzwords geared to impress the reader with the wonders of the business while conveying no specific reference-quality information] ...
... paves the way ...
Constant use of marvel-inspiring adverbial clauses like "As a global business-to-business marketplace" to introduce declarative sentences.
Numerous observations about the benefits created by what the business does.
Added information to Clark James Gable that conveyed actual notability (beforehand, the only indication of even possible significance was his being Clark Gable's grandson).
Expanded and sourced Funeka Soldaat, demonstrating notability.
2013-10-24 – 2013-11-10
Neutralized, copyedited, expanded, and sourced V-Star Creations, and supplied a collection of sources at the deletion discussion that was initiated for the article, helping to rescue it from deletion based on notability considerations.
In grateful acknowledgment of your excellent work with speedy deletions. (Feel free to archive this when it gets annoying!) - Dank (push to talk) 15:43, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
For catching a foreign language copyright violation that I missed at CAT:CSD, and following up after it happened, I award you this defender of the Wiki-barnstar! Keep up the good work, be brave, and never be afraid to call out an administrator when you think they have made a mistake! Chrislk02Chris Kreider 20:27, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi Largoplazo
Thank you for fixing my mistakes did not mean to put them next to the persons name in the table what i meant to do was to make a new sections for elections. Another thing i noticed that you had deleted my edit on "Hazing" in the Rye High School profile, I deleted because I know that this doesnt happen anymore
For being one of the top 50 reviewers of the last 12 months. Thank you very much for your reviewing! — Insertcleverphrasehere(or here) 20:53, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
20:3020:30, 4 February 2023diffhist+102Taipei186.2.146.44talk→Climate: Under Koppen climate classification Taipei is Cwa bordering Cfa : because it is influenced by monsoons and has very humid summers due to monsoon winds, which is characteristic of Cwa climates and is also Cfa because it has more than 50mm of rain every month, reference: https://zh.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E8%87%BA%E5%8C%97%E5%B8%82Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
20:3020:30, 4 February 2023diffhist+102Taipei186.2.146.44talk→Climate: Under Koppen climate classification Taipei is Cwa bordering Cfa : because it is influenced by monsoons and has very humid summers due to monsoon winds, which is characteristic of Cwa climates and is also Cfa because it has more than 50mm of rain every month, reference: https://zh.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E8%87%BA%E5%8C%97%E5%B8%82Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
09:0009:00, 9 May 2021diffhist0 m
Saudi Arabiahissing hissing hissing]]] just point 1 short of high goal for gini so i mean get annoyed by the number 45 9 more like 1959 chevy bel air!. i stuck that number in my head brain forever.Tag: Reverted
14:5114:51, 4 May 2021diffhist+18Federal monarchyI want to be your friendship brother. Because New Zealand is a federal monarchy with future hopes that i want love it. New Zealand is not a unitary monarchyTags: Manual revertReverted
14:4814:48, 4 May 2021diffhist−3New ZealandShut up you big boogie Chipmunkdavis. I think you're the incorrect one. consequently i will believe that new zealand is a federation not a unitary. Eh ada Uni Rini whats going on this?! More like a freaking kitten cat between australia and new zealand!Tags: Manual revertReverted
Sun Feb 21 2016 : Thu Apr 21 2016 : ALO (artist) : I tagged it for sounding like a brochure in the "Urban Expressionism" section. Has anyone dealt with it?
Tue Mar 08 2016 : Wed Mar 09 2016 : Erin Shirreff : Barely an infobox, no content.
Tue Mar 08 2016 : Tue Mar 15 2016 : DoubleToasted.com : Verify that the show was discontinued, and then expurgate.
Sat Mar 26 2016 : Tue Mar 29 2016 : 1st RFF : The title is unhelpful.
Wed Mar 30 2016 : Thu Mar 31 2016 : The Euphonia : Missing words.
Thu Jul 14 2016 : Fri Jul 15 2016 : Parthiban Raja : Seems to be basing an article about himself on another's article. N?
Wed Jul 20 2016 : Wed Aug 10 2016 : Ninel Samokhvalova : Deleted for BLPPROD or not being translated? If it's translated and survives, I still suspect it won't pass GNG.
Sun Oct 16 2016 : Wed Oct 19 2016 : 3WISHES : Has anyone tackled this?
Mon Oct 24 2016 : Tue Oct 25 2016 : Grandmagal : Duplicates Grand Magal, which is a redirect to a page section, but maybe this article will be the fuller one.
Mon Dec 12 2016 : Thu Dec 15 2016 : Cot-caught merger : Check whether the move war has ended and, if it's an article, change the redirect on Caught-cot merger.
Sun Dec 25 2016 : Mon Dec 26 2016 : Panum's area : Still "in progress"?
Mon Dec 26 2016 : Tue Dec 27 2016 : CI/CD : Interesting, a topic that refers to a combination of two things, each with its own article, but about which nothing much can be said beyond what can be said about the components. Can't redirect, so how to handle?
Wed Mar 22 2017 : Wed Mar 22 2017 : Talk:Olivier Pfister : Follow up on his edit requests.
Sat Mar 25 2017 : Sun Mar 26 2017 : Andrea Geyer : Depth
Tue Mar 28 2017 : Wed Mar 29 2017 : Benny Johnson (journalist) : "Benny Johnson is an American journalist" is the sole content, but lots of sources indicate dirt. Check back to see what's been done with this.
Tue Mar 28 2017 : Wed Mar 29 2017 : Adrian Howell : A7?
Sun Apr 09 2017 : Thu Jun 08 2017 : Yam (vegetable) : Any response to my question on the Talk page? Remove the indicated material unless responsive to the contrary comes in.
Fri Apr 20 2018 : Sat May 05 2018 : Francisco Rolando Archila Dehesa : If it survives BLPPROD, I still can't find notability. Not even 20 mentions, even without the matronimic
Fri Jul 24 2020 : Mon Jul 27 2020 : Talk:Panel PC : Any response re unexplained reversion?
Sun Oct 18 2020 : Tue Nov 17 2020 : Ger Duany : Are any references ever supplied for the early life section?
Tue Nov 03 2020 : Fri Nov 06 2020 : Category:Moroccan Western Sahara Wall : Check whether anything other than the eponymous article has been added. If not, speedy delete.
I'm afraid that isn't an indication of its significance or importance. Wikipedia requires topics to be notable, which requires, at least eventually, citation of sources that support a finding that they are notable. Even from the start, an article needs to give some indication that its topic might be of encyclopedic significance, or else it's subject to immediate deletion.
Hi. Please understand that Wikipedia is not about everything. For example, there won't be articles here about every company that makes computers. A credible claim of significance is required to avoid speedy deletion. This is, more or less, something that indicates why one might think that an encyclopedia would have an article about this. the subject. Even if it meets that standard, to avoid eventual deletion it needs to meet the stronger standard of notability. When you write that it's "a new company, so there is not that much issue", you're pretty much explaining why it won't qualify for an article now. That doesn't mean it never will, but we don't make predictions about future notability.
This is English Wikipedia anyway so articles have to be in English.
Even if a copyright holder wants to give permission for copyrighted material to be here, permission needs to be given formally, including permission for everybody in the world to copy that content from here. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for details.
You have to accept that people are free to revise your content here just as they can revise every Wikipedia article.
Wikipedia isn't a web host. It isn't a public relations medium for posting material about yourself or your organization, like a Facebook or Instagram page or a LinkedIn profile. A Wikipedia article isn't a direct communication by an organization to readers of its mission or its vision for the future. In fact, writing about topics over which you have a conflict of interest is strongly discouraged overall.
Explaining deletion submission on account of lack of notability
Hello, Largoplazo, and welcome to Wikipedia! While efforts to improve Wikipedia are always welcome,in my opinion, unfortunately, your contributions are not written in an English that is good enough to be useful. You appear to be more familiar with Urdu language; did you know there is a Urdu Wikipedia? You may prefer to contribute there instead. In any case, welcome to the project, and thank you for your efforts! If you need help, please feel free to notify me on my talk page. —Largo Plazo (talk) 00:56, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Santiago Valiña Martinez is a chess player born 4 May 1999 in Castro Riberas de Lea, Lugo, Spain.
At the age of 10, Valiña began to stand out in local chess tournaments in his region,
A la edad de tan solo 10 años empezó a destacar en torneos comarcales de ajedrez en su región, lo cual lo llevó a disputar su primer torneo autonómico con apenas 11 años. Para sorpresa de muchos salió claro vencedor de dicho torneo al vencer en una reñida final de casi dos horas de juego a Jesús Veiga Rego, el claro favorito a llevarse el título. A la temprana edad de 14 años ya gozaba de un palmares de 2 títulos gallegos de las categorías sub-14 y sub-16 y dos segundos puestos en los cuales sus adversarios habían sido Miguel Mato y Adrian Da Silva respectivamente. Su último gran logro en el campo del ajedrez fue en el 2014 al vencer a Adán Prieto en la final del torneo gallego y clasificarse así al torneo nacional al cual no podría asistir por motivos personales, una verdadera lastima según muchos entendidos ya que llegaba en su mejor momento de forma y era uno de los claros favoritos para llevarse el título y así representar a España en el prestigioso torneo Europeo de ajedrez organizado por la European Chess Union (ECU) disputado del 12 al 23 de mayo en Kosovo (Serbia).
Tras númerosos problemas con su equipo y con su equipo técnico deció abandonar las competiciones momentaneamente para decepción de muchos de nosotros.
Talk:Dentology Ah. Wikipedia is a tertiary source. Articles should consolidate information found largely in secondary reliable sources. It isn't a forum for "pulling back the curtain" on one's own findings, research, or experience, or for pulling together information collected from primary sources. See WP:No original research for details, particularly the section at WP:PSTS.
Any ideas about including auto-repair of WP:REFPUNCT violations? Largoplazo (talk) 00:35, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
I've tested with /\s*(((<ref[^/]*?>[^<]*?</ref>)\s*)+)\s*(([.,"'!?;:])+)/, replacing that with $4$1. And then replacing /\s+(<ref[\s>])/ with $1 to get rid of spaces in front of the refs. Probably neither completely robust nor 100% safe, but it's a start. Largoplazo (talk) 01:11, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
A summary of the key points from the numerous previous discussion poionted out by GGS:
First, a question: How did "Czech Republic" become wrong? It is still the formal long-form name of the country! It hasn't been discarded. Sticking with "Czech Republic" isn't the same as titling the article about Sri Lanka "Ceylon".
The applicable Wikipedia guideline at WP:COMMONNAME indicates that the title should change when the replacement title is being used more frequently in current reliable sources written in English. Many people have provided reliable sources using "Czechia", but with no indication that those sources outnumber sources still using "Czech Republic".
Pointing to specific sources like Google Maps that adopted "Czechia" early and asking "Why don't we follow their approach?" doesn't help because (a) this talk page isn't the place to debate Wikipedia's general approach to article naming, and (b) there's no reason why Wikipedia's approach should copy another publisher's approach that they adopted for their purposes rather than having its own approach for its own purposes.
Anybody who wants to formally request a move may do so but it will lead to no change unless it's demonstrated that "Czechia" has overtaken "Czech Republic" in recent reliable sources written in English. Until then, it isn't worth the trouble. Anyone who submits such a request is best advised to do their homework first and not bother unless they're able to kick off the discussion with a solid case to support the change.
This draft article was already deleted as G4 following Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/El Polimata. The same author also just created Draft:El Polimata (artist), and Draft:El Polímata already exists. These drafts were preceded by ''numerous'' articles in main article space, one after another with various disambiguations added after previous titles had been deleted multiple times and salted. Every version relies primarily on three PR pieces, mostly in Spanish though sometimes in English, with anywhere from two to four or five sources ''carrying the same content'' being referenced in the same incarnation of the article. These are supplemented by the musician's presences on various websites and a battery of music download sites. Basically, this person isn't taking "No" for an answer, and it's fair to assume, all evidence considered, that this Jvatinord, is the latest sockpuppet of the artist himself, operating originally as User:Elmenormcrd and User:El Menor Mc, the case history being located at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/El Menor Mc.
Committed identity: 43bb13bd3836df8095d75399470080d828ad8802ea40ec58a330b668013c5e899a662fe699afb934592000b8793b36bce86b6db384d83ee0f8285f75595d763b is a SHA-512commitment to this user's real-life identity.
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
