User talk:Minnastronomer

July 2025

Hello, I'm LR.127. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, NGC 4565, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. LR.127 (talk) 02:41, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will make sure to attach a source next time. Thank you for your diligence. Minnastronomer (talk) 02:52, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Messier 100, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. —tony 02:41, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will make sure to include the source. Minnastronomer (talk) 02:44, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ann Svennungsen has been accepted

Ann Svennungsen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Perryprog (talk) 23:15, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 44 Cygni has been accepted

44 Cygni, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Chetsford (talk) 20:04, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Patricia Lull (September 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gommeh was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources do not go into detail about her, and quite a few of them are either press releases or other primary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Patricia Lull and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gommeh 📖   🎮 14:42, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Minnastronomer! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gommeh 📖   🎮 14:42, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

hi

i have made some fixes to the articles you created :) ‹hamster717🐉› ^{(discuss anything!🐹✈️ • my contribs🌌🌠)} 18:09, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Which ones? Minnastronomer (talk) 21:29, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I've looked around and seen. All welcome changes. Any improvements are welcome. Minnastronomer (talk) 21:32, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to your articles?

Hello, I am an undergraduate physicist from Texas and I am editing some stub articles on Wikipedia to learn better scientific literacy. I made some slight edits to your Sh 2-312 article to quantify some distance references you made. Please let me know if these are adequate. This is my first Wikipedia edit and I am not an astronomer by any means, but I used some basic trigonometry to figure out the distance in parsecs. I'm happy to do this for some other articles that you have created, but I am unsure how to properly cite these numbers. Thanks! Squiddonaut (talk) 17:22, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's great! A lot of articles I've made have very little known information on them so anything helps. Feel free to go down the list I have on my user page of other articles I've created! Minnastronomer (talk) 18:42, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A (real!) star for you!

	A (real!) star for you!
	Thank you for your work on all the astronomy articles! I was going to give you a barnstar but I figured it might be more appropriate to drop the "barn" :) Rusalkii (talk) 00:16, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!!! I've very happy that I'm getting some acknowledgement of my work!!! Minnastronomer (talk) 03:51, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sagelva moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Sagelva. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 09:20, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Works for me. Minnastronomer (talk) 18:45, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2025 Bloomington, Minnesota municipal election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nonpartisan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Regina Hassanally has been accepted

Regina Hassanally, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MCE89 (talk) 14:04, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]