User talk:LincolnFreehand

November 2024

Hello, I'm Doniago. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of The Goonies. Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 04:02, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Doniago, I just linked Richard Donner's name to his Wikipedia page. Is that the reference you are mentioning? LincolnFreehand (talk) 20:11, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm referring to the IMDb link that you added with the same edit. DonIago (talk) 04:13, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

Hello, I'm MrOllie. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. MrOllie (talk) 20:23, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @MrOllie, I appreciate you reaching out and supporting me as I'm learning the ropes here on Wikipedia. I saw that this page didn't exist and worked to develop the content since it is a space that is growing rapidly alongside SEO and AI. I did have LLM support as I was doing the research for the article and adding relevant references and citations. However, I've gone through every line to verify that the information is accurate and fits the standards of Wikipedia. I will also leave a message on your talk page as well. LincolnFreehand (talk) 14:09, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This article is definitely not ready yet, and the term seems to be used for completely different things beyond SEO: [1] [2]. You need to have at least three reliable sources that discuss this in the context of SEO, not book reviews from 1996, links to generic openai and google pages, and a random R package. Please rewrite it in your own words and then submit via Articles for Creation. SmartSE (talk) 16:21, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Artificial intelligence optimization moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Artificial intelligence optimization. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. SmartSE (talk) 16:17, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Artificial intelligence optimization (April 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ScrabbleTiles was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Artificial intelligence optimization and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ScrabbleTiles (talk) 17:05, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LincolnFreehand! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ScrabbleTiles (talk) 17:05, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brad Lightcap (April 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by BuySomeApples were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brad Lightcap and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 20:07, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brad Lightcap (May 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jlwoodwa was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brad Lightcap and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

jlwoodwa (talk) 01:59, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the feedback and I will continue to work on the article.

I've added some additional thoughts and context to the Talk page for the article as well. LincolnFreehand (talk) 02:23, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LincolnFreehand (talk) 02:22, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the feedback and I will continue to work on the article.

I've added some additional thoughts and context to the Talk page for the article as well.