User talk:LaundryPizza03

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

List of isotopes .

How can I send a list of minor corrections to the List of isotopes articles? I recently send some but I am not sure I used the proper channel. There are 14 of them . Would an e-mail be better ?

Thank you. Michel Béliveau (talk) 04:47, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest you edit the affected articles directly. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 02:59, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning LaundryPizza03

I will preform the edits. Here is the list of these edits so you can have a trail. Thank you. Please note that - for testing purpose - I performed the first one before sending this reply .

D11 Article = Isotopes_of_rhodium

Isotope : ¹¹⁷Rh Decay mode : β⁻ n Result specified : ¹¹⁵Pd Should be : ¹¹⁶Pd

D12 Article = Isotopes_of_palladium

Isotope : ⁹³Pd Decay mode : β⁺ p Result specified : ⁹¹Ru Should be : ⁹²Ru

D13 Article = Isotopes_of_palladium

Isotope : ⁹⁵Pd Decay mode : β⁺ p Result specified : ⁹⁵Rh Should be : ⁹⁴Ru

D14 Article = Isotopes_of_cadmium

Isotope : ⁹⁸Cd Decay mode : β⁺ p Result specified : ⁹⁷Ag Should be : ⁹⁷Pd

D15 Article = Isotopes_of_antimony

Isotope : ¹⁴²Sb Decay mode : β⁻ 2n Result specified : ¹³⁰Te Should be : ¹⁴⁰Te

D16 Article = Isotopes_of_iodine

Isotope : ¹¹¹I Decay mode : β⁺ p Result specified : ¹¹¹Te Should be : ¹¹⁰Sb

D17 Article = Isotopes_of_iodine

Isotope : ¹⁴³I Decay mode : β⁻ n Result specified : ¹⁴¹Xe Should be : ¹⁴²Xe

D18 Article = Isotopes_of_iodine

Isotope : ¹⁴³I Decay mode : β⁻ 2n Result specified : ¹⁴⁰Xe Should be : ¹⁴¹Xe

D19 Article = Isotopes_of_cerium

Isotope : ¹²¹Ce Decay mode : β⁺ p Result specified : ¹²¹La Should be : ¹²⁰Ba

D20 Article = Isotopes_of_dysprosium

Isotope : ¹⁴⁷Dy Decay mode : β⁺ p Result specified : ¹⁴⁶Tb Should be : ¹⁴⁶Gd

D21 Article = Isotopes_of_holmium

Isotope : ¹⁷⁷Ho Decay mode : β⁻ Result specified : ¹⁷⁵Er Should be : ¹⁷⁷Er

D22 Article = Isotopes_of_thulium

Isotope : ¹⁵⁶Tm Decay mode : α Result specified : ¹⁵²Er Should be : ¹⁵²Ho

D23 Article = Isotopes_of_thulium

Isotope : ¹⁵⁷Tm Decay mode : α Result specified : ¹⁵³Er Should be : ¹⁵³Ho

D24 Article = Isotopes_of_gold

Isotope : ²⁰⁹Au Decay mode : β⁻ n Result specified : ²¹⁰Hg Should be : ²⁰⁸Hg

Michel Béliveau (talk) 16:40, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good day.

I applied the changes but got a message for the last 2 :

D23 Article = Isotopes_of_thulium

Isotope : ¹⁵⁷Tm Decay mode : α Result specified : ¹⁵³Er Should be : ¹⁵³Ho

message = This template is missing TemplateData, and its parameters have been autogenerated. As a result the template and its parameters lack descriptions. There might be additional information on the template's page.

D24 Article = Isotopes_of_gold

Isotope : ²⁰⁹Au Decay mode : β⁻ n Result specified : ²¹⁰Hg Should be : ²⁰⁸Hg

message = Required field missing. Are you sure you want to continue without filling the "Reference name 1" field?"

Can you fix that ?

Thank you. Michel Béliveau (talk) 19:04, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have no experience with the visual editor, so I cannot offer guidance. However, I fixed the issues listed here. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 02:00, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much.

Here are 4 edits (almost final edits) that I intend to apply today. They all are minor edits and are in accordance with "The NUBASE2020 evaluation of nuclear physics properties" in Chinese Physics C Vol. 45, No. 3 (2021) 030001.

3 are for half-life units ( ¹³⁰Sm, ²³⁰Rn and ^127m4Sn )

1 about the use of "?" in decay mode and daughter For isotope ⁶⁰Sc : remove the question mark from the daughter isotope (⁶⁰Ti) and apply it to the decay mode. It is only for coherence : it is the only case where de Decay mode does not contain "?" but the daughter isotope contains it. It is the Decay that is uncertain, not the result.

I will eventually post another comment about the use of the "?" in Decay nodes and Daughter isotopes. Michel Béliveau (talk) 13:27, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here is an area where I could perform Edits (minor edits) . The reason I submit this is that they refer to Nuclide IT decays.

My comprehension of an IT decay is that the "Daughter" must be the same isotope having a lower excitation energy or being in the ground state. Therefore, if the "Nuclide" has only 1 isomer (_m) or is the first (_m1), then the "Daughter" is the ground state of the isotope

There are 13 cases where the "Daughter" should be the ground state of the isotope

Example : Nuclide = Mn62m (Z=25) Daughter specified = Mn61 Expected result = Mn62

Is it OK with you if I apply these Edits ? Michel Béliveau (talk) 21:57, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Michel Béliveau Sure, go ahead. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 03:15, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning...

Here a 2 issues :

1 I cannot perform the following EDIT : for nuclide Hs267 (Z=108 N=159) : indicate "ms" as half-life duration
2 Remove the uncertainty for decay result : in my understanding of the "?" , it is the decay mode that is uncertain, not the result.

For instance : check Neon isotope Ne34 (Z=10). If Ne34 undergoes a "Beta minus n" decay, the result will definitely be Na33 - there is no need for the "?" after Na33

If you agree to my interpretation, I could make the EDITS ( if I can... ) to remove the "?" from the "Daughter isotope". Here are some numbers : there are 703 decays having a mode flagged with a "?". 56 of them also have a "Daughter isotope" flagged with a "?" - these are the subject of my request. 56 looks as a big number, but they concern only 12 elements ( Fluor(10), Neon(7), Sodium(9)and Magnesium(9) contain 35 of them...) so it is not a big job to do after all.

Is it OK with you for me to apply these changes ?

Thank you for your support. Michel Béliveau (talk) 18:52, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 04:43, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Outcome of your RfA

I have closed your RfA as unsuccessful. Thanks for submitting your candidacy. I hope the feedback left by editors is useful and know that many people have successfully gained administrator rights after initially being unsuccessful. Barkeep49 (talk) 03:30, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I find your behavior surrounding the RFA inexplicable. It seems out of character with the positive interactions and constructive contributions I associate you with. I hope that you continue to productively engage with the encyclopedia. (t · c) buidhe 08:47, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry your RfA was unsuccessful. I hope you continue doing what you have been doing, and I hope you run again successfully at some point in the future. Yngvadottir (talk) 21:02, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A pie for you!

Unfortunately, your RfA was not successful. So, instead of eating pizza and doing laundry as your username suggests, you should eat some pie! GTrang (talk) 03:44, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Blue zone

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Blue zone, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:50, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SW DOTF

Yes, but it had been live for about 18 hours by then. I've blanked my sandbox now. — ImaginesTigers (talk) 10:42, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]