User talk:Kamien Case

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thanasis Deligiannis (February 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The sources are too trivial to establish notabiliity.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 02:00, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Kamien Case! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 02:00, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Notable people who have edited Wikipedia). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Netherzone (talk) 19:43, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Thanasis Deligiannis has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Thanasis Deligiannis. Thanks! Netherzone (talk) 14:52, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Thanasis Deligiannis has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Thanasis Deligiannis. Thanks! Netherzone (talk) 20:58, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thanasis Deligiannis has been accepted

[edit]
Thanasis Deligiannis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Star Mississippi 02:45, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Star Mississippi thank you for reviewing and accepting! Kamien Case (talk) 08:39, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You're most welcome. Don't hesitate to be in touch with me or with @Netherzone if we can help further. Star Mississippi 14:46, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, thank you @Star Mississippi, and for your comment on your talk. I'm working on cleaning up some of the "art speak" and also removing redundancy & working on improving the tone so it does not sound promotional. Best to you and to @Kamien Case. Netherzone (talk) 18:51, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for this work @Netherzone! I'm checking the edits, it reads much better now. One question: In the introduction paragraph, should "blending" be "blends"? (His work blending installation and performance, acoustic and electronic music, urban and rural culture.) Kamien Case (talk) 19:17, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, thanks for pointing that out! If there are other edit requests, place them on the article talk page using the edit request wizard for COI editors (link here: Wikipedia:Edit Request Wizard/COI). Please keep requests short if possible. There are a team of editors who work on answering these requests, although there is often a backlog, and sometimes it can take a while. (I will keep the article on my watchlist.) Netherzone (talk) 19:26, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Kamien Case I'm also happy to help implement requested edits. I removed new technologies from that sentence on my edit as it wasn't really clear in that context, although you and @Netherzone explained it more clearly below. I think we're in the era where every day is a new technology so sometimes we have to specify Star Mississippi 19:28, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
All right @Netherzone! I'll have a look now and go through the Edit Request Wizard. I see for example for the Venice Biennale work there are 5 artists mentioned, which should be 4.
Yes, thank you @Star Mississippi. Kamien Case (talk) 19:30, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also, the lead section could be improved by adding another sentence or two. Lead sections of biographies of living persons should briefly include why the person is considered notable. What are the two most important facts? Netherzone (talk) 19:31, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I see, such as Venice Biennale. I'll get back to this by the end of the month, running into crossing deadlines these days. Thank you both for all the help and editing power. Kamien Case (talk) 19:35, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]