User talk:JMPhillips92

Reference to "stooks-smith" on East Gloucestershire (UK Parliament constituency)

Hi, In May 2020 with this edit you added a reference - "stooks-smith" - to East Gloucestershire (UK Parliament constituency). This is currently ref 3 & used at 4 places in the article. This is giving a CS1 error "Cite error: The named reference stooks-smith was invoked but never defined" because no details are given. Do you have the source to add? - if you want help with formattng let me know.— Rod ^talk 10:39, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore that I have just changed the way references are displayed and solved the problem.— Rod ^talk 10:43, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Election box candidate unopposed

Template:Election box candidate unopposed has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 12:11, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Election box candidate unopposed for alliance

Template:Election box candidate unopposed for alliance has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 12:11, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Peterborough (UK Parliament constituency)

Peterborough (UK Parliament constituency) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm _Talk 00:36, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suspension of autopatrolled permission due to inactivity

Hello JMPhillips92. Following a request for comment in May 2025, the community has decided to implement an activity requirement for the autopatrolled permission. Because your account has not edited in the last three years, the autopatrolled permission has been removed from your account. This action is purely procedural and does not affect your ability to create articles; if you return to actively creating articles, you may request that the permission be restored through the normal process. When returning, please consider taking some time to re-familiarize yourself with common practices and how they may have changed over the past few years if you wish to request the permission back. Thank you for all of your contributions to Wikipedia, and we hope to see you again soon. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:18, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Redbrick Newspaper Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Redbrick Newspaper Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:32, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]