User talk:Rodw
New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive
[edit]| January 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol |  |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
Speedy deletion nomination of University of Ohio (disambiguation)
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on University of Ohio (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is:
- a disambiguation page with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" which lists only one extant Wikipedia page (i.e., there is a primary topic);
- a disambiguation page that lists zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
- a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" whose target is neither a disambiguation page nor page that has a disambiguation-like function.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:27, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Krapfen (disambiguation)
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Krapfen (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is:
- a disambiguation page with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" which lists only one extant Wikipedia page (i.e., there is a primary topic);
- a disambiguation page that lists zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
- a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" whose target is neither a disambiguation page nor page that has a disambiguation-like function.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:13, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Quantock Hills
[edit]Quantock Hills has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:16, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
Counties and parishes in Queensland
[edit]Re: your edit on Coochin Creek. Counties and parishes were used as part of the land administration system until about 1990 (note these are civil parishes, unrelated to religious parishes). Other than being a named area on a map, there is no practical significance to parishes today (other than to record the relevant parishes for people interested in the history of an area). We do have articles for a number of the Queensland counties, e.g. County of Canning in this case, which list the names and coords of the parishes, but there are no articles on the parishes themselves (as far as I know) because there is very little you can say about them. So, while articles on Queensland places may mention their parish in the infobox, there will be no article to link to. If there was a county article, a link to County of Canning#Parishes could be added I guess. There might be other geographic place articles in Queensland which have the same name as a county or parish (which may be related or merely coincidence but they will not be describing the parish). But probably the simplest thing is to leave them alone. Kerry (talk) 02:17, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info. I have only visited Queensland once & it was many years ago, so my knowledge is limited. Because of the way the infobox is formatted the bot software is picking these up as links to disambiguation pages and adding them to lists at Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links as needing fixing. To stop this, would it be worth turning them int red links eg Beerwah (parish) or similar title?— Rod talk 08:07, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
- The problem seems to be that recent changes to the Infobox Australian place has resulted in automatically adding links to the parish field (which previously did not occur, you had to manually link it if you wanted it linked). I have raised the issue on the infobox talk page and am hoping the solution lies in fixing the infobox, then they won't appear as redlinks. Kerry (talk) 21:00, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
A Very Merry Christmas to you!
[edit]
.JPG)
.jpg)
.jpg)
Hello there. 'Tis the season again, believe it or not, the years pass so quickly now! Your contributions to Wikipedia in 2025 are greatly appreciated! Wishing you a Very Merry Christmas, and here's to a happy and productive 2026! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:13, 18 December 2025 (UTC)