User talk:InfoNodeSL

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shanmuganathan Vasanthapriyan (December 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by RangersRus were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to
Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
RangersRus (talk) 12:08, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, InfoNodeSL. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Shanmuganathan Vasanthapriyan, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Dan arndt (talk) 01:08, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shanmuganathan Vasanthapriyan (December 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 01:10, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, InfoNodeSL! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 01:10, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shanmuganathan Vasanthapriyan (December 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thilio was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to
Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please see WP:NPROF
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 05:27, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Academics meeting any one of the following conditions, as substantiated through reliable sources, are notable.WP:NPROF
Notability Criteria Satisfied:
  • Scholarly impact: Research published in internationally indexed journals and cited in academic literature.
  • Prestigious awards: Received two awards from the President of Sri Lanka.
  • Fellowships/memberships:
  • Higher education contributions: Moderated AI panel discussions and involved in national academic networks.
  • Professor appointment: Holds a professor position at a major Sri Lankan university.
  • Top administrative roles:
  • Public engagement: Evidence of contributions outside academia.
  • Editorial roles: Reviewer/editor positions mentioned.
I think the draft was started only after all the notability criteria were satisfied. InfoNodeSL (talk) 05:41, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]